构建支持水政策创业的模糊综合指标

Amelia Pérez Zabaleta , Pascual Fernández , Juan F. Prados-Castillo , Mónica de Castro-Pardo
{"title":"构建支持水政策创业的模糊综合指标","authors":"Amelia Pérez Zabaleta ,&nbsp;Pascual Fernández ,&nbsp;Juan F. Prados-Castillo ,&nbsp;Mónica de Castro-Pardo","doi":"10.1016/j.stae.2022.100022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Composite indicators play a very useful role in supporting international policy entrepreneurship, helping to inform decision-making processes and to address conflicts between countries. In this paper we present a Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis (Fuzzy-DEA) model to construct composite indicators based on time series under the Pressure-State-Response (PSR) approach in order to evaluate water security in 10 European water security hotspots. First, we identified nine indicators within the PSR framework. Second, we aggregated the indicators in each PSR set using a Fuzzy-DEA model. Finally, we compared the PSR results under pessimistic, optimistic and neutral scenarios. Results show that, overall, Bulgaria achieved the best pressure, state and response performance. In terms of responses, Spain registered the best performance after Bulgaria, despite the fact that it suffers from the highest pressures of all the analyzed countries. Estonia achieved the best state performance in all three scenarios, but worse results in responses than Bulgaria and Spain. Cyprus and Belgium registered the highest variability for pressures, Spain for state and Portugal for responses.</p><p>The model was able to pinpoint the problems that political strategies and urgent actions should seek to tackle, while providing information regarding the variability of the indicators over time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101202,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship","volume":"1 3","pages":"Article 100022"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773032822000220/pdfft?md5=eeea14aa0acb3bdb6f7bb82c4d1bda19&pid=1-s2.0-S2773032822000220-main.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constructing fuzzy composite indicators to support water policy entrepreneurship\",\"authors\":\"Amelia Pérez Zabaleta ,&nbsp;Pascual Fernández ,&nbsp;Juan F. Prados-Castillo ,&nbsp;Mónica de Castro-Pardo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.stae.2022.100022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Composite indicators play a very useful role in supporting international policy entrepreneurship, helping to inform decision-making processes and to address conflicts between countries. In this paper we present a Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis (Fuzzy-DEA) model to construct composite indicators based on time series under the Pressure-State-Response (PSR) approach in order to evaluate water security in 10 European water security hotspots. First, we identified nine indicators within the PSR framework. Second, we aggregated the indicators in each PSR set using a Fuzzy-DEA model. Finally, we compared the PSR results under pessimistic, optimistic and neutral scenarios. Results show that, overall, Bulgaria achieved the best pressure, state and response performance. In terms of responses, Spain registered the best performance after Bulgaria, despite the fact that it suffers from the highest pressures of all the analyzed countries. Estonia achieved the best state performance in all three scenarios, but worse results in responses than Bulgaria and Spain. Cyprus and Belgium registered the highest variability for pressures, Spain for state and Portugal for responses.</p><p>The model was able to pinpoint the problems that political strategies and urgent actions should seek to tackle, while providing information regarding the variability of the indicators over time.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship\",\"volume\":\"1 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100022\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773032822000220/pdfft?md5=eeea14aa0acb3bdb6f7bb82c4d1bda19&pid=1-s2.0-S2773032822000220-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773032822000220\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773032822000220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

综合指标在支持国际政策创业、帮助为决策过程提供信息和解决国家间冲突方面发挥着非常有益的作用。本文基于压力-状态-响应(PSR)方法,采用模糊数据包络分析(Fuzzy- dea)模型构建基于时间序列的复合指标,对欧洲10个水安全热点地区进行了水安全评价。一是确定了可持续发展战略框架下的9项指标。其次,我们使用Fuzzy-DEA模型汇总了每个PSR集的指标。最后,我们比较了悲观、乐观和中性情景下的PSR结果。结果表明,总体而言,保加利亚取得了最佳的压力、状态和响应性能。就回应而言,西班牙的表现仅次于保加利亚,尽管它在所有被分析的国家中承受着最大的压力。爱沙尼亚在所有三种情况下都取得了最好的国家表现,但在回应中却不如保加利亚和西班牙。塞浦路斯和比利时的压力差异最大,西班牙和葡萄牙的反应差异最大。该模型能够明确指出政治战略和紧急行动应设法解决的问题,同时提供关于指标随时间变化的资料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Constructing fuzzy composite indicators to support water policy entrepreneurship

Composite indicators play a very useful role in supporting international policy entrepreneurship, helping to inform decision-making processes and to address conflicts between countries. In this paper we present a Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis (Fuzzy-DEA) model to construct composite indicators based on time series under the Pressure-State-Response (PSR) approach in order to evaluate water security in 10 European water security hotspots. First, we identified nine indicators within the PSR framework. Second, we aggregated the indicators in each PSR set using a Fuzzy-DEA model. Finally, we compared the PSR results under pessimistic, optimistic and neutral scenarios. Results show that, overall, Bulgaria achieved the best pressure, state and response performance. In terms of responses, Spain registered the best performance after Bulgaria, despite the fact that it suffers from the highest pressures of all the analyzed countries. Estonia achieved the best state performance in all three scenarios, but worse results in responses than Bulgaria and Spain. Cyprus and Belgium registered the highest variability for pressures, Spain for state and Portugal for responses.

The model was able to pinpoint the problems that political strategies and urgent actions should seek to tackle, while providing information regarding the variability of the indicators over time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Market-oriented entrepreneurship and the impact of social media and crowdsourcing on continuous organizational learning. An empirical study AI technology for developing Bitcoin investment strategies based on altcoin trends Technological Progress as a Catalyst for Energy Efficiency: A Sustainable Technology Perspective AI-induced job impact: Complementary or substitution? Empirical insights and sustainable technology considerations Digitalization and non-profits: Competency requirements in non-profit sector of Saudi Arabia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1