海上油田生产筛选试验的周转时间和质量优化——一些案例研究

S. Eyitayo, K. Lawal, I. Abdullahi, S. Matemilola, John Akadang, Victor Anyanwu, Bernard Ainoje, Tunde Alabi, S. Owolabi
{"title":"海上油田生产筛选试验的周转时间和质量优化——一些案例研究","authors":"S. Eyitayo, K. Lawal, I. Abdullahi, S. Matemilola, John Akadang, Victor Anyanwu, Bernard Ainoje, Tunde Alabi, S. Owolabi","doi":"10.2118/207105-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Production-screening test (PST) is performed on a reservoir drill-in fluid (RDIF) prior to running any component of the lower completion assembly that is vulnerable to plugging. This is applicable in open-hole completions in which wire-wrapped production screens are deployed. The key objective of a PST is to reduce the risk of plugging key completion components, such as production screens, during subsequent flow back. Hence, a PST increases the chance of preserving well productivity (or injectivity), ultimate recovery and project economics. However, conducting and achieving PST-quality RDIF in offshore fields can be cumbersome, time-consuming, and expensive, yet the quality is not guaranteed.\n This paper presents the formulation, implementation, and results of a simple strategy to reduce the turnaround time and costs of achieving PST-quality RDIF for applications in offshore fields. Employing a combination of on-the-job assessment, empirical data and expert opinions, the strengths and weaknesses of onsite versus offsite (onshore) options of preparing PST-quality RDIF for offshore operations are evaluated.\n As a case-study, empirical data from the execution of both onsite and offsite options for an example field are employed for the evaluation. Results of simple cost-time-benefit analysis underscore the robustness and competitiveness of preparing the PST-quality RDIF offsite and transporting same for subsequent test validation and application on the rig.\n The results of these empirical examples show that the offsite option yields about 75% cost-saving relative to its onsite counterpart. In addition to cost saving, other incremental benefits of the former include (i) significant reduction in rig time and personnel; (ii) improved RDIF quality; and (iii) higher chances of preserving well performance and economics. To increase the success rate, residual risks of the preferred offsite option are outlined, and relevant mitigations provided.","PeriodicalId":10899,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, August 03, 2021","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimization of the Turnaround Time and Quality of Production-Screening Tests in Offshore Fields – Some Case Studies\",\"authors\":\"S. Eyitayo, K. Lawal, I. Abdullahi, S. Matemilola, John Akadang, Victor Anyanwu, Bernard Ainoje, Tunde Alabi, S. Owolabi\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/207105-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Production-screening test (PST) is performed on a reservoir drill-in fluid (RDIF) prior to running any component of the lower completion assembly that is vulnerable to plugging. This is applicable in open-hole completions in which wire-wrapped production screens are deployed. The key objective of a PST is to reduce the risk of plugging key completion components, such as production screens, during subsequent flow back. Hence, a PST increases the chance of preserving well productivity (or injectivity), ultimate recovery and project economics. However, conducting and achieving PST-quality RDIF in offshore fields can be cumbersome, time-consuming, and expensive, yet the quality is not guaranteed.\\n This paper presents the formulation, implementation, and results of a simple strategy to reduce the turnaround time and costs of achieving PST-quality RDIF for applications in offshore fields. Employing a combination of on-the-job assessment, empirical data and expert opinions, the strengths and weaknesses of onsite versus offsite (onshore) options of preparing PST-quality RDIF for offshore operations are evaluated.\\n As a case-study, empirical data from the execution of both onsite and offsite options for an example field are employed for the evaluation. Results of simple cost-time-benefit analysis underscore the robustness and competitiveness of preparing the PST-quality RDIF offsite and transporting same for subsequent test validation and application on the rig.\\n The results of these empirical examples show that the offsite option yields about 75% cost-saving relative to its onsite counterpart. In addition to cost saving, other incremental benefits of the former include (i) significant reduction in rig time and personnel; (ii) improved RDIF quality; and (iii) higher chances of preserving well performance and economics. To increase the success rate, residual risks of the preferred offsite option are outlined, and relevant mitigations provided.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Tue, August 03, 2021\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Tue, August 03, 2021\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/207105-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, August 03, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/207105-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在下入下部完井组合的任何容易堵塞的组件之前,需要对储层钻入液(RDIF)进行生产筛选测试(PST)。这适用于裸眼完井中使用钢丝包裹生产筛管的情况。PST的主要目标是在随后的返排过程中降低关键完井部件(如生产筛管)堵塞的风险。因此,PST增加了保持油井产能(或注入能力)、最终采收率和项目经济效益的机会。然而,在海上油田进行和实现pst质量的RDIF可能是繁琐、耗时和昂贵的,而且质量也得不到保证。本文介绍了一种简单策略的制定、实施和结果,以减少海上油田应用中实现pst质量RDIF的周转时间和成本。结合现场评估、经验数据和专家意见,评估了为海上作业准备pst质量RDIF的现场方案与非现场(陆上)方案的优缺点。作为一个案例研究,从现场和非现场的一个示例领域的执行经验数据被用于评估。简单的成本-时间-效益分析结果强调了在现场制备pst质量的RDIF并将其运输到后续的测试验证和钻机上应用的稳健性和竞争力。这些实证实例的结果表明,相对于现场期权,非现场期权的成本节约约75%。除了节省成本外,前者的其他增量效益还包括:(1)显著减少钻井时间和人员;(ii)改善RDIF质量;(3)更有可能保持油井性能和经济效益。为了提高成功率,概述了首选非现场方案的剩余风险,并提供了相关的缓解措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimization of the Turnaround Time and Quality of Production-Screening Tests in Offshore Fields – Some Case Studies
Production-screening test (PST) is performed on a reservoir drill-in fluid (RDIF) prior to running any component of the lower completion assembly that is vulnerable to plugging. This is applicable in open-hole completions in which wire-wrapped production screens are deployed. The key objective of a PST is to reduce the risk of plugging key completion components, such as production screens, during subsequent flow back. Hence, a PST increases the chance of preserving well productivity (or injectivity), ultimate recovery and project economics. However, conducting and achieving PST-quality RDIF in offshore fields can be cumbersome, time-consuming, and expensive, yet the quality is not guaranteed. This paper presents the formulation, implementation, and results of a simple strategy to reduce the turnaround time and costs of achieving PST-quality RDIF for applications in offshore fields. Employing a combination of on-the-job assessment, empirical data and expert opinions, the strengths and weaknesses of onsite versus offsite (onshore) options of preparing PST-quality RDIF for offshore operations are evaluated. As a case-study, empirical data from the execution of both onsite and offsite options for an example field are employed for the evaluation. Results of simple cost-time-benefit analysis underscore the robustness and competitiveness of preparing the PST-quality RDIF offsite and transporting same for subsequent test validation and application on the rig. The results of these empirical examples show that the offsite option yields about 75% cost-saving relative to its onsite counterpart. In addition to cost saving, other incremental benefits of the former include (i) significant reduction in rig time and personnel; (ii) improved RDIF quality; and (iii) higher chances of preserving well performance and economics. To increase the success rate, residual risks of the preferred offsite option are outlined, and relevant mitigations provided.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Production and Performance Evaluation of Biodetergents as an Alternative to Conventional Drilling Detergent Comparative Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Models for Drilling Rate of Penetration Prediction The Limitation of Reservoir Saturation Logging Tool in a Case of a Deeper Reservoir Flow into a Shallower Reservoir Within the Same Wellbore Surrogate-Based Analysis of Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery – A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Model Performance Understanding the Impacts of Backpressure & Risk Analysis of Different Gas Hydrate Blockage Scenarios on the Integrity of Subsea Flowlines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1