系统回顾和荟萃分析软骨素酶ABC促进大鼠脊髓损伤模型的功能恢复。

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Nutritional Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-11 DOI:10.1080/1028415X.2023.2278867
Ya-Yun Zhang, Rui-Rui Xue, Min Yao, Zhuo-Yao Li, Cai-Wei Hu, Yu-Xiang Dai, Yi-de Fang, Xing Ding, Jin-Hai Xu, Xue-Jun Cui, Wen Mo
{"title":"系统回顾和荟萃分析软骨素酶ABC促进大鼠脊髓损伤模型的功能恢复。","authors":"Ya-Yun Zhang, Rui-Rui Xue, Min Yao, Zhuo-Yao Li, Cai-Wei Hu, Yu-Xiang Dai, Yi-de Fang, Xing Ding, Jin-Hai Xu, Xue-Jun Cui, Wen Mo","doi":"10.1080/1028415X.2023.2278867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To comprehensively assess the neurologic recovery potential of chondroitinase ABC (ChABC) in rats after spinal cord injury (SCI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were searched for animal experiments that evaluated the use of ChABC in the treatment of SCI up to November 2022. Studies reporting neurological function using the Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan (BBB) scale, as well as assessments of cavity area, lesion area, and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) levels, were included in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 46 studies were ultimately selected for inclusion. The results of the study showed that rats with SCI that received ChABC therapy exhibited a significant improvement in locomotor function after 7 days compared with controls (32 studies, weighted mean difference (WMD) = 0.58, [0.33, 0.83], <i>p </i>< 0.00001). Furthermore, the benefits of ChABC therapy were maintained for up to 28 days according to BBB scale. The lesion area was reduced by ChABC (5 studies, WMD = -20.94, [-28.42, -13.46], <i>p </i>< 0.00001). Meanwhile, GFAP levels were reduced in the ChABC treatment group (8 studies, WMD = -29.15, [-41.57, -16.72], <i>p < </i>0.00001). Cavity area is not statistically significant. The subgroup analysis recommended that a single injection of 10 μL (8 studies, WMD = 2.82, [1.99, 3.65], <i>p < </i>0.00001) or 20 U/mL (4 studies, WMD = 2.21, [0.73, 3.70], <i>p = </i>0.003) had a better effect on improving the function. The funnel plot of the BBB scale was found to be essentially symmetrical, indicating a low risk of publication bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis has indicated that ChABC could improve functional recovery in rats after SCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":19423,"journal":{"name":"Nutritional Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review and meta-analysis of chondroitinase ABC promotes functional recovery in rat models of spinal cord injury.\",\"authors\":\"Ya-Yun Zhang, Rui-Rui Xue, Min Yao, Zhuo-Yao Li, Cai-Wei Hu, Yu-Xiang Dai, Yi-de Fang, Xing Ding, Jin-Hai Xu, Xue-Jun Cui, Wen Mo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1028415X.2023.2278867\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To comprehensively assess the neurologic recovery potential of chondroitinase ABC (ChABC) in rats after spinal cord injury (SCI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were searched for animal experiments that evaluated the use of ChABC in the treatment of SCI up to November 2022. Studies reporting neurological function using the Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan (BBB) scale, as well as assessments of cavity area, lesion area, and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) levels, were included in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 46 studies were ultimately selected for inclusion. The results of the study showed that rats with SCI that received ChABC therapy exhibited a significant improvement in locomotor function after 7 days compared with controls (32 studies, weighted mean difference (WMD) = 0.58, [0.33, 0.83], <i>p </i>< 0.00001). Furthermore, the benefits of ChABC therapy were maintained for up to 28 days according to BBB scale. The lesion area was reduced by ChABC (5 studies, WMD = -20.94, [-28.42, -13.46], <i>p </i>< 0.00001). Meanwhile, GFAP levels were reduced in the ChABC treatment group (8 studies, WMD = -29.15, [-41.57, -16.72], <i>p < </i>0.00001). Cavity area is not statistically significant. The subgroup analysis recommended that a single injection of 10 μL (8 studies, WMD = 2.82, [1.99, 3.65], <i>p < </i>0.00001) or 20 U/mL (4 studies, WMD = 2.21, [0.73, 3.70], <i>p = </i>0.003) had a better effect on improving the function. The funnel plot of the BBB scale was found to be essentially symmetrical, indicating a low risk of publication bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis has indicated that ChABC could improve functional recovery in rats after SCI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutritional Neuroscience\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutritional Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1028415X.2023.2278867\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutritional Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1028415X.2023.2278867","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:综合评价大鼠脊髓损伤(SCI)后软骨素酶ABC (ChABC)的神经功能恢复潜力。方法:检索PubMed、Embase、ScienceDirect、Web of Science和中国国家知识基础设施数据库,检索截至2022年11月评估ChABC在SCI治疗中使用的动物实验。使用Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan (BBB)量表报告神经功能的研究,以及对空洞面积,病变面积和胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)水平的评估被纳入分析。结果:最终共纳入46项研究。研究结果显示,与对照组相比,接受ChABC治疗的脊髓损伤大鼠在7天后运动功能有显著改善(32项研究,加权平均差(WMD) = 0.58, [0.33, 0.83], p p p 0.00001)。空腔面积差异无统计学意义。亚组分析提示单次注射10 μL(8项研究,WMD = 2.82, [1.99, 3.65], p 0.00001)或20 U/mL(4项研究,WMD = 2.21, [0.73, 3.70], p = 0.003)对功能的改善效果更好。BBB量表的漏斗图基本对称,表明发表偏倚风险较低。结论:本系统综述和荟萃分析表明,ChABC可以改善脊髓损伤后大鼠的功能恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A systematic review and meta-analysis of chondroitinase ABC promotes functional recovery in rat models of spinal cord injury.

Background: To comprehensively assess the neurologic recovery potential of chondroitinase ABC (ChABC) in rats after spinal cord injury (SCI).

Methods: The PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were searched for animal experiments that evaluated the use of ChABC in the treatment of SCI up to November 2022. Studies reporting neurological function using the Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan (BBB) scale, as well as assessments of cavity area, lesion area, and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) levels, were included in the analysis.

Results: A total of 46 studies were ultimately selected for inclusion. The results of the study showed that rats with SCI that received ChABC therapy exhibited a significant improvement in locomotor function after 7 days compared with controls (32 studies, weighted mean difference (WMD) = 0.58, [0.33, 0.83], p < 0.00001). Furthermore, the benefits of ChABC therapy were maintained for up to 28 days according to BBB scale. The lesion area was reduced by ChABC (5 studies, WMD = -20.94, [-28.42, -13.46], p < 0.00001). Meanwhile, GFAP levels were reduced in the ChABC treatment group (8 studies, WMD = -29.15, [-41.57, -16.72], p < 0.00001). Cavity area is not statistically significant. The subgroup analysis recommended that a single injection of 10 μL (8 studies, WMD = 2.82, [1.99, 3.65], p < 0.00001) or 20 U/mL (4 studies, WMD = 2.21, [0.73, 3.70], p = 0.003) had a better effect on improving the function. The funnel plot of the BBB scale was found to be essentially symmetrical, indicating a low risk of publication bias.

Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis has indicated that ChABC could improve functional recovery in rats after SCI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nutritional Neuroscience
Nutritional Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
236
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutritional Neuroscience is an international, interdisciplinary broad-based, online journal for reporting both basic and clinical research in the field of nutrition that relates to the central and peripheral nervous system. Studies may include the role of different components of normal diet (protein, carbohydrate, fat, moderate use of alcohol, etc.), dietary supplements (minerals, vitamins, hormones, herbs, etc.), and food additives (artificial flavours, colours, sweeteners, etc.) on neurochemistry, neurobiology, and behavioural biology of all vertebrate and invertebrate organisms. Ideally this journal will serve as a forum for neuroscientists, nutritionists, neurologists, psychiatrists, and those interested in preventive medicine.
期刊最新文献
Dietary factors and the incidence of intracranial aneurysms: a Mendelian randomization research. Nutrient intake and food selectivity in children with Tourette syndrome. An extract of Hibiscus sabdariffa improves short-term memory in rats with experimental diabetic hyperglycemia. Low-carbohydrate diet as a nutritional intervention in a major depression disorder: focus on relapse prevention. Assessing the pattern electroretinogram as a proxy measure for dopamine in the context of iron deficiency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1