除草剂草甘膦及其对人体健康的明显争议性影响:最新临床观点。

Carlo Caiati, Paolo Pollice, Stefano Favale, Mario Erminio Lepera
{"title":"除草剂草甘膦及其对人体健康的明显争议性影响:最新临床观点。","authors":"Carlo Caiati, Paolo Pollice, Stefano Favale, Mario Erminio Lepera","doi":"10.2174/1871530319666191015191614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glyphosate (G) is the most common weed-killer in the world. Every year tons and tons of G are applied on crop fields. G was first introduced in the mid 1970s and since then its usage has gradually increased to reach a peak since 2005. Now G usage is approximately 100 -fold what it was in 1970. Its impact on human health was considered benign at the beginning. But over the years, evidence of a pervasive negative effect of this pesticide on humans has been mounting. Nonetheless, G usage is allowed by government health control agencies (both in the United States and Europe), that rely upon the evidence produced by the G producer. However, the IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) in 2015 has stated that G is probable carcinogenic (class 2A), the second highest class in terms of risk.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this review, we explore the effect of G on human health, focusing in particular on more recent knowledge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We have attempted to untangle the controversy about the dangers of the product for human beings in view of a very recent development, when the so -called Monsanto Papers, consisting of Emails and memos from Monsanto came to light, revealing a coordinated strategy to manipulate the debate about the safety of glyphosate to the company's advantage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The story of G is a recurrent one (see the tobacco story), that seriously jeopardizes the credibility of the scientific study in the modern era.</p>","PeriodicalId":30288,"journal":{"name":"Estudos do CEPE","volume":"1 1","pages":"489-505"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Herbicide Glyphosate and Its Apparently Controversial Effect on Human Health: An Updated Clinical Perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Carlo Caiati, Paolo Pollice, Stefano Favale, Mario Erminio Lepera\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1871530319666191015191614\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glyphosate (G) is the most common weed-killer in the world. Every year tons and tons of G are applied on crop fields. G was first introduced in the mid 1970s and since then its usage has gradually increased to reach a peak since 2005. Now G usage is approximately 100 -fold what it was in 1970. Its impact on human health was considered benign at the beginning. But over the years, evidence of a pervasive negative effect of this pesticide on humans has been mounting. Nonetheless, G usage is allowed by government health control agencies (both in the United States and Europe), that rely upon the evidence produced by the G producer. However, the IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) in 2015 has stated that G is probable carcinogenic (class 2A), the second highest class in terms of risk.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this review, we explore the effect of G on human health, focusing in particular on more recent knowledge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We have attempted to untangle the controversy about the dangers of the product for human beings in view of a very recent development, when the so -called Monsanto Papers, consisting of Emails and memos from Monsanto came to light, revealing a coordinated strategy to manipulate the debate about the safety of glyphosate to the company's advantage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The story of G is a recurrent one (see the tobacco story), that seriously jeopardizes the credibility of the scientific study in the modern era.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Estudos do CEPE\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"489-505\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Estudos do CEPE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1871530319666191015191614\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudos do CEPE","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1871530319666191015191614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

背景:草甘膦(Glyphosate,G)是世界上最常见的除草剂。每年都有成吨成吨的草甘膦被施用在农田里。草甘膦于 20 世纪 70 年代中期首次问世,此后其用量逐渐增加,并于 2005 年达到顶峰。现在,禾草灵的用量大约是 1970 年的 100 倍。开始时,人们认为它对人类健康的影响是无害的。但随着时间的推移,越来越多的证据表明,这种杀虫剂对人类普遍存在负面影响。尽管如此,美国和欧洲的政府卫生控制机构仍允许使用 G,并以 G 生产商提供的证据为依据。然而,国际癌症研究机构(IARC)在 2015 年指出,γ 可能致癌(2A 级),是风险第二高的等级:在这篇综述中,我们探讨了 G 对人类健康的影响,尤其侧重于最新的知识:孟山都公司的电子邮件和备忘录组成的所谓 "孟山都文件 "曝光,揭示了孟山都公司采取协调策略,操纵有关草甘膦安全性的辩论,以达到对公司有利的目的:G 的故事一再发生(参见烟草的故事),严重危害了现代科学研究的可信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Herbicide Glyphosate and Its Apparently Controversial Effect on Human Health: An Updated Clinical Perspective.

Background: Glyphosate (G) is the most common weed-killer in the world. Every year tons and tons of G are applied on crop fields. G was first introduced in the mid 1970s and since then its usage has gradually increased to reach a peak since 2005. Now G usage is approximately 100 -fold what it was in 1970. Its impact on human health was considered benign at the beginning. But over the years, evidence of a pervasive negative effect of this pesticide on humans has been mounting. Nonetheless, G usage is allowed by government health control agencies (both in the United States and Europe), that rely upon the evidence produced by the G producer. However, the IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) in 2015 has stated that G is probable carcinogenic (class 2A), the second highest class in terms of risk.

Objective: In this review, we explore the effect of G on human health, focusing in particular on more recent knowledge.

Results: We have attempted to untangle the controversy about the dangers of the product for human beings in view of a very recent development, when the so -called Monsanto Papers, consisting of Emails and memos from Monsanto came to light, revealing a coordinated strategy to manipulate the debate about the safety of glyphosate to the company's advantage.

Conclusion: The story of G is a recurrent one (see the tobacco story), that seriously jeopardizes the credibility of the scientific study in the modern era.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Herbicide Glyphosate and Its Apparently Controversial Effect on Human Health: An Updated Clinical Perspective. Análise da propensão ao endividamento em um contexto universitário Uso da modelagem computacional para comparativo entre adição de diferentes percentuais de biodiesel no transporte de resíduos sólidos urbanos A dinâmica e o construto territorial da região noroeste do estado do Rio Grande do Sul Custos e retorno: uma análise comparativa entre as variedades de tabaco Virginia e Burley em uma propriedade rural do Rio Grande do Sul
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1