大流行期间进退两难的方法:连续成功和同时成功

Steven B. Kim, Joonghak Lee
{"title":"大流行期间进退两难的方法:连续成功和同时成功","authors":"Steven B. Kim, Joonghak Lee","doi":"10.1080/09332480.2022.2039026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the breakout of the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries and local-level governments have made and adjusted decisions to control the movement of people. It is a dilemma because a decision from the perspective of public health and a decision from the perspective of economy (or freedom of people) are too distant on the spectrum of the level of restriction. Yet, some decision makers seek a compromising decision in order to succeed in both public health and economy. Under five assumptions with simple logistic models, we demonstrate hypothetical scenarios for the probability of simultaneous successes (both public health and economy) and the probability of simultaneous failures. The take-home messages are not surprising: We probably want to solve our pandemic crisis sequentially rather than simultaneously, and our responsible actions can lift the probability of simultaneous successes if we desperately need a compromising decision to solve it simultaneously.","PeriodicalId":88226,"journal":{"name":"Chance (New York, N.Y.)","volume":"46 1","pages":"34 - 37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Approaches to a Dilemma During the Pandemic: Sequential Successes and Simultaneous Successes\",\"authors\":\"Steven B. Kim, Joonghak Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09332480.2022.2039026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the breakout of the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries and local-level governments have made and adjusted decisions to control the movement of people. It is a dilemma because a decision from the perspective of public health and a decision from the perspective of economy (or freedom of people) are too distant on the spectrum of the level of restriction. Yet, some decision makers seek a compromising decision in order to succeed in both public health and economy. Under five assumptions with simple logistic models, we demonstrate hypothetical scenarios for the probability of simultaneous successes (both public health and economy) and the probability of simultaneous failures. The take-home messages are not surprising: We probably want to solve our pandemic crisis sequentially rather than simultaneously, and our responsible actions can lift the probability of simultaneous successes if we desperately need a compromising decision to solve it simultaneously.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chance (New York, N.Y.)\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"34 - 37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chance (New York, N.Y.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09332480.2022.2039026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chance (New York, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09332480.2022.2039026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新冠肺炎疫情发生以来,许多国家和地方政府做出并调整了控制人员流动的决策。这是一个困境,因为从公共卫生的角度作出的决定和从经济(或人民自由)的角度作出的决定在限制水平的范围上相差太远。然而,为了在公共卫生和经济方面取得成功,一些决策者寻求折衷的决定。在五个假设和简单的逻辑模型下,我们展示了同时成功的概率(公共卫生和经济)和同时失败的概率的假设情景。关键信息并不令人惊讶:我们可能希望按顺序而不是同时解决我们的大流行病危机,如果我们迫切需要一个妥协的决定来同时解决它,我们负责任的行动可以提高同时成功的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Approaches to a Dilemma During the Pandemic: Sequential Successes and Simultaneous Successes
Since the breakout of the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries and local-level governments have made and adjusted decisions to control the movement of people. It is a dilemma because a decision from the perspective of public health and a decision from the perspective of economy (or freedom of people) are too distant on the spectrum of the level of restriction. Yet, some decision makers seek a compromising decision in order to succeed in both public health and economy. Under five assumptions with simple logistic models, we demonstrate hypothetical scenarios for the probability of simultaneous successes (both public health and economy) and the probability of simultaneous failures. The take-home messages are not surprising: We probably want to solve our pandemic crisis sequentially rather than simultaneously, and our responsible actions can lift the probability of simultaneous successes if we desperately need a compromising decision to solve it simultaneously.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multiple discoveries in causal inference: LATE for the party. Bayes Factors for Forensic Decision Analyses with R Three Welcome Arrivals for 2023: 1. Florence Nightingale Bayesian Probability for Babies Fresh Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1