不同水平学习者英语作文平均依赖距离的差异

IF 0.2 Q4 LINGUISTICS Glottometrics Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.53482/2022_53_400
M. Oya
{"title":"不同水平学习者英语作文平均依赖距离的差异","authors":"M. Oya","doi":"10.53482/2022_53_400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the differences in the mean dependency distances (MDDs) of the English essays in a learner corpus, focusing on the different proficiency levels of learners, and the different dependency types. This study is based on the following three assumptions. Firstly, the MDDs of learners' production increase as proficiency levels increase. Secondly, there is an upper limit over which MDDs do not exceed, as predicted by the Dependency Distance Minimization principle. Finally, different types of dependencies show different tendencies across learners of different proficiency levels. This study attempts to verify these assumptions with substantial learner corpus data, categorized into subcorpora according to learner proficiency. Corpus analyses yield results that support these assumptions. These results are expected to constitute a prerequisite for employing the MDD of an individual learner's production to evaluate his or her proficiency level.","PeriodicalId":51918,"journal":{"name":"Glottometrics","volume":"1 1","pages":"24-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences of Mean Dependency Distances of English Essays Written by Learners of Different Proficiency Levels\",\"authors\":\"M. Oya\",\"doi\":\"10.53482/2022_53_400\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigates the differences in the mean dependency distances (MDDs) of the English essays in a learner corpus, focusing on the different proficiency levels of learners, and the different dependency types. This study is based on the following three assumptions. Firstly, the MDDs of learners' production increase as proficiency levels increase. Secondly, there is an upper limit over which MDDs do not exceed, as predicted by the Dependency Distance Minimization principle. Finally, different types of dependencies show different tendencies across learners of different proficiency levels. This study attempts to verify these assumptions with substantial learner corpus data, categorized into subcorpora according to learner proficiency. Corpus analyses yield results that support these assumptions. These results are expected to constitute a prerequisite for employing the MDD of an individual learner's production to evaluate his or her proficiency level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51918,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Glottometrics\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"24-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Glottometrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53482/2022_53_400\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Glottometrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53482/2022_53_400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了学习者语料库中英语作文的平均依赖距离(mdd)的差异,重点关注学习者不同的熟练程度和不同的依赖类型。本研究基于以下三个假设。首先,学习者产出的MDDs随着熟练程度的提高而增加。其次,正如依赖距离最小化原则所预测的那样,存在一个mdd不能超过的上限。最后,不同类型的依赖在不同水平的学习者中表现出不同的倾向。本研究试图用大量的学习者语料库数据来验证这些假设,这些数据根据学习者的熟练程度被分类为子语料库。语料库分析产生的结果支持这些假设。预期这些结果将构成使用单个学习者的产品的MDD来评估他或她的熟练程度的先决条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differences of Mean Dependency Distances of English Essays Written by Learners of Different Proficiency Levels
This study investigates the differences in the mean dependency distances (MDDs) of the English essays in a learner corpus, focusing on the different proficiency levels of learners, and the different dependency types. This study is based on the following three assumptions. Firstly, the MDDs of learners' production increase as proficiency levels increase. Secondly, there is an upper limit over which MDDs do not exceed, as predicted by the Dependency Distance Minimization principle. Finally, different types of dependencies show different tendencies across learners of different proficiency levels. This study attempts to verify these assumptions with substantial learner corpus data, categorized into subcorpora according to learner proficiency. Corpus analyses yield results that support these assumptions. These results are expected to constitute a prerequisite for employing the MDD of an individual learner's production to evaluate his or her proficiency level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Glottometrics
Glottometrics LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The aim of Glottometrics is quantification, measurement and mathematical modeling of any kind of language phenomena. We invite contributions on probabilistic or other mathematical models (e.g. graph theoretic or optimization approaches) which enable to establish language laws that can be validated by testing statistical hypotheses.
期刊最新文献
The meaning distributions on different levels of granularity The journal SMIL - Statistical Methods in Linguistics (1962-1976) - some notes about the history of quantitative linguistics in Scandinavia and beyond A comparison of two text specificity measures analyzing a heterogenous text corpus Fellow or foe? A quantitative thematic exploration into Putin's and Trump's stylometric features Quantifying syntax similarity with a polynomial representation of dependency trees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1