小正义的行为-在TRC之后继续寻求正义

A. Boesak
{"title":"小正义的行为-在TRC之后继续寻求正义","authors":"A. Boesak","doi":"10.5952/54-0-341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Taking as point of departure, South African theologian Dirkie\n Smit’s theological oeuvre, particularly his theological reflections on issues such as\n politics, justice, peace and reconciliation, the essay moves on to focus on Mahmood\n Mamdani’s view of the differences between the Nuremberg trials, South Africa’s\n political negotiations held in Kempton Park and the TRC and his critique of the\n latter. This once again raises the matter of justice, different forms of justice –\n especially as either “victor justice” or “survivor justice” and the consequences of\n this for the TRC and for christians in the call for the doing of justice. With\n reference to the views of Desmond Tutu (especially his understanding of the concept\n of ubuntu), it is suggested that the TRC’s only choice was not just between\n retributive and restorative justice, revenge and forgiveness, but that it was\n incumbent upon it to advance the gains made at Kempton Park and to move from\n victim’s justice to survivor’s justice and from the foundation of political justice\n to social justice which it did not do.","PeriodicalId":18902,"journal":{"name":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The doing of the little righteousness - the on-going search for justice after the TRC\",\"authors\":\"A. Boesak\",\"doi\":\"10.5952/54-0-341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Taking as point of departure, South African theologian Dirkie\\n Smit’s theological oeuvre, particularly his theological reflections on issues such as\\n politics, justice, peace and reconciliation, the essay moves on to focus on Mahmood\\n Mamdani’s view of the differences between the Nuremberg trials, South Africa’s\\n political negotiations held in Kempton Park and the TRC and his critique of the\\n latter. This once again raises the matter of justice, different forms of justice –\\n especially as either “victor justice” or “survivor justice” and the consequences of\\n this for the TRC and for christians in the call for the doing of justice. With\\n reference to the views of Desmond Tutu (especially his understanding of the concept\\n of ubuntu), it is suggested that the TRC’s only choice was not just between\\n retributive and restorative justice, revenge and forgiveness, but that it was\\n incumbent upon it to advance the gains made at Kempton Park and to move from\\n victim’s justice to survivor’s justice and from the foundation of political justice\\n to social justice which it did not do.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5952/54-0-341\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5952/54-0-341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

以南非神学家Dirkie Smit的神学作品为出发点,特别是他对政治,正义,和平与和解等问题的神学反思,本文继续关注Mahmood Mamdani对纽伦堡审判,南非在肯普顿公园举行的政治谈判和TRC之间差异的看法以及他对后者的批评。这再次提出了正义的问题,不同形式的正义——特别是作为“胜利者的正义”或“幸存者的正义”,以及这对TRC和呼吁正义的基督徒的影响。参考Desmond Tutu的观点(尤其是他对ubuntu概念的理解),建议TRC的唯一选择不仅仅是在报复和恢复性正义之间,复仇和宽恕之间,但它有责任推进在肯普顿公园取得的成果,从受害者的正义转向幸存者的正义,从政治正义的基础转向社会正义,这是它没有做到的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The doing of the little righteousness - the on-going search for justice after the TRC
Taking as point of departure, South African theologian Dirkie Smit’s theological oeuvre, particularly his theological reflections on issues such as politics, justice, peace and reconciliation, the essay moves on to focus on Mahmood Mamdani’s view of the differences between the Nuremberg trials, South Africa’s political negotiations held in Kempton Park and the TRC and his critique of the latter. This once again raises the matter of justice, different forms of justice – especially as either “victor justice” or “survivor justice” and the consequences of this for the TRC and for christians in the call for the doing of justice. With reference to the views of Desmond Tutu (especially his understanding of the concept of ubuntu), it is suggested that the TRC’s only choice was not just between retributive and restorative justice, revenge and forgiveness, but that it was incumbent upon it to advance the gains made at Kempton Park and to move from victim’s justice to survivor’s justice and from the foundation of political justice to social justice which it did not do.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Power games: Using Foucault to shed light on the inherent power dynamics of intercultural Bible study groups. Discussion of a qualitative research project The rising prominence of John Owen: A research article of “The Ashgate Research Companion to John Owen’s Theology” Alle kaarte op die preek “Rise up and walk” : tracing the trajectory of the Carnegie discourse and plotting a way forward The relevance of Galatians 5:16-26 in the modern "spiritual intelligence" debate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1