简化与标准化Penman蒸发方程的比较:以埃及地中海沿岸为例

IF 2.2 Q1 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ejar.2021.12.001
Maged M.A. Hussein
{"title":"简化与标准化Penman蒸发方程的比较:以埃及地中海沿岸为例","authors":"Maged M.A. Hussein","doi":"10.1016/j.ejar.2021.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>One of the dilemmas that researchers face when applying the Penman equation (1948) is that it requires significant meteorological data that are not readily available at the standard meteorological stations. Therefore, many researchers have worked hard to devise several simplified algebraic equations that are equivalent to the standard Penman equation to calculate evaporation quantities with accuracy from the available data. In this study, the Penman equation, which is a reference method, was applied in addition to four other simplified methods. Notably, one method of the simplified methods did not require wind speed data. To calculate the evaporation quantities by analyzing the daily averages along the Egyptian Mediterranean Coast (Mersa Matruh, Alexandria and Port Said) for a period of ten years from 2007 to 2016, several statistical methods have been applied to assess and evaluate the performance and suitability of these simplified methods. It was clear from the results obtained that two of these simplified methods are of good efficiency when compared to the standard Penman equation, whereas, the third method is only valid for moderate or low wind speeds (&lt; = 3 m/s). The results of the fourth method indicated that it was not suitable for application in the study area.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46117,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research","volume":"48 4","pages":"Pages 315-323"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687428521001047/pdfft?md5=9abdc952ce413699d2ad830cbb06252f&pid=1-s2.0-S1687428521001047-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between simplified and standardized Penman evaporation equation: Egyptian Mediterranean coast case study\",\"authors\":\"Maged M.A. Hussein\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejar.2021.12.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>One of the dilemmas that researchers face when applying the Penman equation (1948) is that it requires significant meteorological data that are not readily available at the standard meteorological stations. Therefore, many researchers have worked hard to devise several simplified algebraic equations that are equivalent to the standard Penman equation to calculate evaporation quantities with accuracy from the available data. In this study, the Penman equation, which is a reference method, was applied in addition to four other simplified methods. Notably, one method of the simplified methods did not require wind speed data. To calculate the evaporation quantities by analyzing the daily averages along the Egyptian Mediterranean Coast (Mersa Matruh, Alexandria and Port Said) for a period of ten years from 2007 to 2016, several statistical methods have been applied to assess and evaluate the performance and suitability of these simplified methods. It was clear from the results obtained that two of these simplified methods are of good efficiency when compared to the standard Penman equation, whereas, the third method is only valid for moderate or low wind speeds (&lt; = 3 m/s). The results of the fourth method indicated that it was not suitable for application in the study area.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research\",\"volume\":\"48 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 315-323\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687428521001047/pdfft?md5=9abdc952ce413699d2ad830cbb06252f&pid=1-s2.0-S1687428521001047-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687428521001047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687428521001047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究人员在应用Penman方程(1948)时面临的困境之一是,它需要在标准气象站不易获得的重要气象数据。因此,许多研究人员努力设计了几个简化的代数方程,这些方程等价于标准的Penman方程,以便从现有数据中准确地计算蒸发量。在本研究中,除了采用其他四种简化方法外,还采用了参考方法Penman方程。值得注意的是,简化方法中的一种方法不需要风速数据。通过分析埃及地中海沿岸(Mersa Matruh、Alexandria和Port Said) 2007 - 2016年10年的日平均值计算蒸发量,应用几种统计方法对这些简化方法的性能和适用性进行了评估和评价。从得到的结果可以清楚地看出,与标准Penman方程相比,这两种简化方法具有良好的效率,而第三种方法仅适用于中低速(<= 3 m/s)。结果表明,第四种方法不适合在研究区应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison between simplified and standardized Penman evaporation equation: Egyptian Mediterranean coast case study

One of the dilemmas that researchers face when applying the Penman equation (1948) is that it requires significant meteorological data that are not readily available at the standard meteorological stations. Therefore, many researchers have worked hard to devise several simplified algebraic equations that are equivalent to the standard Penman equation to calculate evaporation quantities with accuracy from the available data. In this study, the Penman equation, which is a reference method, was applied in addition to four other simplified methods. Notably, one method of the simplified methods did not require wind speed data. To calculate the evaporation quantities by analyzing the daily averages along the Egyptian Mediterranean Coast (Mersa Matruh, Alexandria and Port Said) for a period of ten years from 2007 to 2016, several statistical methods have been applied to assess and evaluate the performance and suitability of these simplified methods. It was clear from the results obtained that two of these simplified methods are of good efficiency when compared to the standard Penman equation, whereas, the third method is only valid for moderate or low wind speeds (< = 3 m/s). The results of the fourth method indicated that it was not suitable for application in the study area.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research
Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.70%
发文量
63
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: The Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research is published by the National Institute of Oceanography & Fisheries. The Journal isdevoted to the publication of original papers and reviews in all branches of aquatic sciences (Oceanography, Limnology, Fisheries,Aquaculture and environmental sciences)
期刊最新文献
Assessment the toxicological perturbations of zinc oxide nanoparticles on histopathology, biochemistry and protein profile in marine mussels Brachidontes pharaonis Digital shoreline analysis system techniques for stability detection: An applied case study on Port Said, Egypt Prospects and Constraints of Lowest Astronomical Tide (LAT) as Determination of Sea Boundaries in Indonesia Effects of noni fruit extract on the growth performance, digestive enzymes, and stress tolerance of juvenile whiteleg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) Effects of sublethal concentrations of zinc nanoparticles on bioaccumulation and cellular response in the Rabbitfish Siganus rivulatus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1