自动裂变径迹计数系统的相互比较

Dariush Azimi-Garakani
{"title":"自动裂变径迹计数系统的相互比较","authors":"Dariush Azimi-Garakani","doi":"10.1016/0167-5087(84)91343-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The methods of counting fission tracks by two image analyzing computers and a spark counting system are compared with a standard microscopy technique. In this comparison, for automatic fission track counting, the two commercially available image analyzer instruments, the Quantimet 720 and the Leitz-Texture Analyzing System (TAS) and a specially designed spark counter, the UTASC system, have been used. The results showed that the relative counting efficiencies of the Quantimet 720, the Leitz-TAS and the UTASC system are 0.974±0.010, 0.988±0.013 and 0.955±0.010, respectively</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100972,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research","volume":"225 1","pages":"Pages 101-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0167-5087(84)91343-7","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intercomparison of automatic fission track counting systems\",\"authors\":\"Dariush Azimi-Garakani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0167-5087(84)91343-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The methods of counting fission tracks by two image analyzing computers and a spark counting system are compared with a standard microscopy technique. In this comparison, for automatic fission track counting, the two commercially available image analyzer instruments, the Quantimet 720 and the Leitz-Texture Analyzing System (TAS) and a specially designed spark counter, the UTASC system, have been used. The results showed that the relative counting efficiencies of the Quantimet 720, the Leitz-TAS and the UTASC system are 0.974±0.010, 0.988±0.013 and 0.955±0.010, respectively</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research\",\"volume\":\"225 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 101-103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1984-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0167-5087(84)91343-7\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167508784913437\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167508784913437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

用两台图像分析计算机和一个火花计数系统来计数裂变径迹的方法与标准显微镜技术进行了比较。在这个比较中,对于自动裂变径迹计数,使用了两种市售的图像分析仪器,Quantimet 720和Leitz-Texture analysis System (TAS)和一个专门设计的火花计数器,UTASC系统。结果表明,Quantimet 720、Leitz-TAS和UTASC系统的相对计数效率分别为0.974±0.010、0.988±0.013和0.955±0.010
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intercomparison of automatic fission track counting systems

The methods of counting fission tracks by two image analyzing computers and a spark counting system are compared with a standard microscopy technique. In this comparison, for automatic fission track counting, the two commercially available image analyzer instruments, the Quantimet 720 and the Leitz-Texture Analyzing System (TAS) and a specially designed spark counter, the UTASC system, have been used. The results showed that the relative counting efficiencies of the Quantimet 720, the Leitz-TAS and the UTASC system are 0.974±0.010, 0.988±0.013 and 0.955±0.010, respectively

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Future needs and requirements for AMS 14C standards and reference materials. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Surface and bulk study of calcium phosphate bioceramics obtained by Metal Organic Chemical Vapor Deposition Subject index Author index Editorial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1