放映现场:技术上重新配置作者的概念

Q3 Arts and Humanities Body, Space and Technology Pub Date : 2020-02-19 DOI:10.16995/bst.338
Bernadette Cochrane
{"title":"放映现场:技术上重新配置作者的概念","authors":"Bernadette Cochrane","doi":"10.16995/bst.338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The dramatic tradition suggests, for the most part, a progressive \nrelationship between author, performer, producer and audience, in which the \nauthor/s originates the playtext, the performers develop a production, and \nthe producer presents the outcome to the public. The arrival of theatrical \nperformance and the fine art exhibition on cinema screens worldwide, the \nphenomenon of ‘live relay’ or the ‘as live broadcast’ in the arts, challenges \nthis familiar perception of the author/production/audience relationship. The \nemergence of screening live performances in cinemas has modulated the \nonce-traditional dramaturgical interaction between text, production, and \naudience. The ‘live relay’ tests the very way we think about theatre and \nperformance. With its destabilization of production and audience spatiotemporal locators, the ‘live relay’ disrupts the vocabulary of theatrical \ndescription and it inflects both ontological and epistemological attitudes \nto the theatre-viewing of the past, the theatre-making of the present, \nand the interactions thereof. The live relay, moreover, causes disturbances \nwithin what can be considered the authorial field. If postdramatic theatre \nshifts the dramaturgical valency from playwright as creative genius to \ndirector as auteur, then the mediaturgy of the ‘live relay’ renders both of \nthese models redundant. This article examines the proposition that the \nlive relay has given rise to new authorial voices and bodies, those of the \ncinematic director and the institution. These are bodies and voices that \nneed to be accommodated within the mediated and intermedial paradigm \nof screening live performance in cinema.","PeriodicalId":37044,"journal":{"name":"Body, Space and Technology","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screened Live: Technologically Reconfiguring Notions of the\\n Author\",\"authors\":\"Bernadette Cochrane\",\"doi\":\"10.16995/bst.338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The dramatic tradition suggests, for the most part, a progressive \\nrelationship between author, performer, producer and audience, in which the \\nauthor/s originates the playtext, the performers develop a production, and \\nthe producer presents the outcome to the public. The arrival of theatrical \\nperformance and the fine art exhibition on cinema screens worldwide, the \\nphenomenon of ‘live relay’ or the ‘as live broadcast’ in the arts, challenges \\nthis familiar perception of the author/production/audience relationship. The \\nemergence of screening live performances in cinemas has modulated the \\nonce-traditional dramaturgical interaction between text, production, and \\naudience. The ‘live relay’ tests the very way we think about theatre and \\nperformance. With its destabilization of production and audience spatiotemporal locators, the ‘live relay’ disrupts the vocabulary of theatrical \\ndescription and it inflects both ontological and epistemological attitudes \\nto the theatre-viewing of the past, the theatre-making of the present, \\nand the interactions thereof. The live relay, moreover, causes disturbances \\nwithin what can be considered the authorial field. If postdramatic theatre \\nshifts the dramaturgical valency from playwright as creative genius to \\ndirector as auteur, then the mediaturgy of the ‘live relay’ renders both of \\nthese models redundant. This article examines the proposition that the \\nlive relay has given rise to new authorial voices and bodies, those of the \\ncinematic director and the institution. These are bodies and voices that \\nneed to be accommodated within the mediated and intermedial paradigm \\nof screening live performance in cinema.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Body, Space and Technology\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Body, Space and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.16995/bst.338\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Body, Space and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16995/bst.338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

戏剧传统在很大程度上表明,作者、表演者、制片人和观众之间存在着一种递进的关系,在这种关系中,作者创作剧本,表演者创作作品,制片人向公众呈现结果。戏剧表演和美术展览在世界各地的电影屏幕上的到来,艺术中的“现场转播”或“现场直播”现象,挑战了这种熟悉的作者/制作/观众关系的看法。电影院现场放映表演的出现改变了曾经传统的戏剧文本、作品和观众之间的互动。“现场转播”测试了我们对戏剧和表演的看法。由于生产和观众时空定位的不稳定性,“现场转播”破坏了戏剧描述的词汇,它反映了对过去的戏剧观看,现在的戏剧制作及其相互作用的本体论和认识论态度。此外,现场转播会在可被认为是作者的领域内引起干扰。如果后戏剧剧场将戏剧的价值从作为创作天才的剧作家转变为作为导演的导演,那么“现场转播”的媒介使这两种模式都变得多余。本文考察了直播产生了新的作者声音和主体的命题,即电影导演和机构的声音和主体。这些身体和声音需要被容纳在电影放映现场表演的中介范式中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Screened Live: Technologically Reconfiguring Notions of the Author
The dramatic tradition suggests, for the most part, a progressive relationship between author, performer, producer and audience, in which the author/s originates the playtext, the performers develop a production, and the producer presents the outcome to the public. The arrival of theatrical performance and the fine art exhibition on cinema screens worldwide, the phenomenon of ‘live relay’ or the ‘as live broadcast’ in the arts, challenges this familiar perception of the author/production/audience relationship. The emergence of screening live performances in cinemas has modulated the once-traditional dramaturgical interaction between text, production, and audience. The ‘live relay’ tests the very way we think about theatre and performance. With its destabilization of production and audience spatiotemporal locators, the ‘live relay’ disrupts the vocabulary of theatrical description and it inflects both ontological and epistemological attitudes to the theatre-viewing of the past, the theatre-making of the present, and the interactions thereof. The live relay, moreover, causes disturbances within what can be considered the authorial field. If postdramatic theatre shifts the dramaturgical valency from playwright as creative genius to director as auteur, then the mediaturgy of the ‘live relay’ renders both of these models redundant. This article examines the proposition that the live relay has given rise to new authorial voices and bodies, those of the cinematic director and the institution. These are bodies and voices that need to be accommodated within the mediated and intermedial paradigm of screening live performance in cinema.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Body, Space and Technology
Body, Space and Technology Arts and Humanities-Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Iraqi Silent Theatre: The Body and Sound in Anas Abdel-Samad’s A Dream in Baghdad (2006) I AM (VR) : Wu-wei (無為), Tenuous Self (虛我) and the Liminal Body in Virtual Reality DEEP FLOW: an embodied materiality of dance, technology, and bodily experience Literature Review - Dani Ploeger, Deserted Devices and Wasted Fences: Everyday Technologies in Extreme Circumstances Returning to the Body: Somatic Sensing in Multi-Person Virtual Reality Technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1