“他们在想什么?”:将家庭医疗保险排除在提供补充社会需求福利之外

W. Cabin
{"title":"“他们在想什么?”:将家庭医疗保险排除在提供补充社会需求福利之外","authors":"W. Cabin","doi":"10.1177/10848223221135576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is significant literature on social determinants of health (SDOH) to improve health outcomes. In response, Congress and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have expanded Medicare Advantage Plans’ ability to cover SDOH-related services through supplemental benefits and Special Needs Plans (SNPs). Congress has not authorized Traditional Medicare to cover such services. A literature review indicates no studies of Medicare home health social worker awareness of this dichotomy and their resulting perceptions of the impacts of the lack of such coverage. This article summarizes an initial, exploratory study to address the literature gap, based on interviews of a convenience sample of 44 home care social workers from 5 different home health agencies in the New York City metropolitan area between November 1, 2021, and May 31, 2022. Results indicate social workers lacked awareness of the dichotomy in coverage of SNPs and supplemental benefits in Medicare Advantage Plans and traditional Medicare. Once made aware of the dichotomy, 4 additional themes emerged from the interviews: documented patient needs were being ignored; the supplemental needs coverage permitted for Medicare Advantage plans should be extended to beneficiaries receiving traditional Medicare; and the lack of such coverage increased the risk of onset of mental and physical health conditions, and revolving door-admissions and costs. Policymakers are urged to consider adding coverage of special needs and supplemental benefits covered in Medicare Advantage to traditional Medicare, through Medicare home health.","PeriodicalId":45762,"journal":{"name":"Home Health Care Management and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“What Were They Thinking?”: The Exclusion of Medicare Home Health From Providing Supplemental Social Needs Benefits\",\"authors\":\"W. Cabin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10848223221135576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is significant literature on social determinants of health (SDOH) to improve health outcomes. In response, Congress and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have expanded Medicare Advantage Plans’ ability to cover SDOH-related services through supplemental benefits and Special Needs Plans (SNPs). Congress has not authorized Traditional Medicare to cover such services. A literature review indicates no studies of Medicare home health social worker awareness of this dichotomy and their resulting perceptions of the impacts of the lack of such coverage. This article summarizes an initial, exploratory study to address the literature gap, based on interviews of a convenience sample of 44 home care social workers from 5 different home health agencies in the New York City metropolitan area between November 1, 2021, and May 31, 2022. Results indicate social workers lacked awareness of the dichotomy in coverage of SNPs and supplemental benefits in Medicare Advantage Plans and traditional Medicare. Once made aware of the dichotomy, 4 additional themes emerged from the interviews: documented patient needs were being ignored; the supplemental needs coverage permitted for Medicare Advantage plans should be extended to beneficiaries receiving traditional Medicare; and the lack of such coverage increased the risk of onset of mental and physical health conditions, and revolving door-admissions and costs. Policymakers are urged to consider adding coverage of special needs and supplemental benefits covered in Medicare Advantage to traditional Medicare, through Medicare home health.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Home Health Care Management and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Home Health Care Management and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10848223221135576\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Home Health Care Management and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10848223221135576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

关于改善健康结果的健康社会决定因素(SDOH)有大量文献。作为回应,国会和医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)通过补充福利和特殊需要计划(snp)扩大了医疗保险优势计划的能力,使其涵盖与sdoh相关的服务。国会尚未授权传统医疗保险覆盖这些服务。一项文献综述表明,没有研究表明医疗保险家庭卫生社会工作者对这种二分法的认识,以及他们对缺乏这种覆盖的影响的看法。本文总结了一项初步的探索性研究,以解决文献空白,该研究基于2021年11月1日至2022年5月31日期间对纽约市大都会地区5家不同家庭卫生机构的44名家庭护理社会工作者的访谈。结果表明,社会工作者缺乏对医疗保险优势计划和传统医疗保险中snp和补充福利覆盖的二分法的认识。一旦意识到这种二分法,从访谈中出现了4个额外的主题:记录在案的患者需求被忽视了;医疗保险优势计划允许的补充需求覆盖范围应该扩展到接受传统医疗保险的受益人;而且,缺乏这种覆盖增加了精神和身体健康状况发生的风险,以及旋转门入院和费用。政策制定者被敦促考虑在传统医疗保险的基础上,通过医疗保险家庭健康,增加医疗保险优势的特殊需求和补充福利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“What Were They Thinking?”: The Exclusion of Medicare Home Health From Providing Supplemental Social Needs Benefits
There is significant literature on social determinants of health (SDOH) to improve health outcomes. In response, Congress and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have expanded Medicare Advantage Plans’ ability to cover SDOH-related services through supplemental benefits and Special Needs Plans (SNPs). Congress has not authorized Traditional Medicare to cover such services. A literature review indicates no studies of Medicare home health social worker awareness of this dichotomy and their resulting perceptions of the impacts of the lack of such coverage. This article summarizes an initial, exploratory study to address the literature gap, based on interviews of a convenience sample of 44 home care social workers from 5 different home health agencies in the New York City metropolitan area between November 1, 2021, and May 31, 2022. Results indicate social workers lacked awareness of the dichotomy in coverage of SNPs and supplemental benefits in Medicare Advantage Plans and traditional Medicare. Once made aware of the dichotomy, 4 additional themes emerged from the interviews: documented patient needs were being ignored; the supplemental needs coverage permitted for Medicare Advantage plans should be extended to beneficiaries receiving traditional Medicare; and the lack of such coverage increased the risk of onset of mental and physical health conditions, and revolving door-admissions and costs. Policymakers are urged to consider adding coverage of special needs and supplemental benefits covered in Medicare Advantage to traditional Medicare, through Medicare home health.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Home Health Care Management & Practice is a comprehensive resource for clinicians, case managers, and administrators providing home and community based health care. Articles address diverse issues, ranging from individual patient care and case management to the human resource management and organizational operations management and administration of organizations and agencies. Regular columns focus on research, legal issues, psychosocial perspectives, accreditation and licensing, compliance, management, and cultural diversity. Specific topics include treatment, care and therapeutic techniques, cultural competence, family caregivers, equipment management, human resources, home health center.
期刊最新文献
Inter-Organizational Home Care Nursing Teams: A Comparison of a Region Wide Organizational Change Initiative With Success Factors Identified by Forerunners and Team Theory Is Palliative Care Cost-Effective? A Systematic Review of the Literature “They Are Lost Souls”: Medicare Home Care Nurses’ Perceptions of Medicare’s Inadequate Coverage of Homebound Persons With Alzheimer’s Disease An Online, Self-Report Version of the Home Falls and Accidents Screening Tool (HOME FAST-SR) to Identify Fall-Related Hazards in the Homes of Older People The Effect on Home Caregivers of a Family Support Program Based on a Nurse-Led Case Management Model: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1