挪威的CRISPR三文鱼被纳入全球创新体系

Joaquín Zenteno Hopp, Matthew Coffay, Emil Tomson Lindfors
{"title":"挪威的CRISPR三文鱼被纳入全球创新体系","authors":"Joaquín Zenteno Hopp, Matthew Coffay, Emil Tomson Lindfors","doi":"10.1080/00291951.2023.2197622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The aim of the paper is to determine how inclusion, as understood in the literature on responsible research and innovation (RRI), should be acknowledged in the global innovation system in Norway for CRISPR salmon. The authors conceptualize inclusion from a systems perspective (i.e., systemic inclusion) and use global innovation systems (GIS) as a conceptual framework. The analysis is based on an actor-network map comprising innovation projects and actors drawn from empirical data by applying socio-technical configuration analysis (STCA). The authors find that inclusion should be addressed by acknowledging that CRISPR salmon innovation is performed in a market-anchored GIS. This means that “footloose” knowledge should be prioritized in order to understand the problems that CRISPR innovation aims to tackle and the type of risks that it implies, but also that local valuations should be prioritized in order to build a functional legal and market structure along with local social concerns. The authors conclude that the approach is necessary because although it is recognized that the inclusion of new and diverse perspectives needs to be done strategically when innovating with CRISPR technology, there is no clear rationale that can help when defining a strategy for who should be included and why.","PeriodicalId":46764,"journal":{"name":"Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian Journal of Geography","volume":"56 1","pages":"10 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inclusion in the global innovation system for CRISPR salmon in Norway\",\"authors\":\"Joaquín Zenteno Hopp, Matthew Coffay, Emil Tomson Lindfors\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00291951.2023.2197622\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The aim of the paper is to determine how inclusion, as understood in the literature on responsible research and innovation (RRI), should be acknowledged in the global innovation system in Norway for CRISPR salmon. The authors conceptualize inclusion from a systems perspective (i.e., systemic inclusion) and use global innovation systems (GIS) as a conceptual framework. The analysis is based on an actor-network map comprising innovation projects and actors drawn from empirical data by applying socio-technical configuration analysis (STCA). The authors find that inclusion should be addressed by acknowledging that CRISPR salmon innovation is performed in a market-anchored GIS. This means that “footloose” knowledge should be prioritized in order to understand the problems that CRISPR innovation aims to tackle and the type of risks that it implies, but also that local valuations should be prioritized in order to build a functional legal and market structure along with local social concerns. The authors conclude that the approach is necessary because although it is recognized that the inclusion of new and diverse perspectives needs to be done strategically when innovating with CRISPR technology, there is no clear rationale that can help when defining a strategy for who should be included and why.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian Journal of Geography\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"10 - 20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian Journal of Geography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2023.2197622\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian Journal of Geography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2023.2197622","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文的目的是确定挪威CRISPR鲑鱼的全球创新体系如何承认负责任研究与创新(RRI)文献中所理解的包容性。作者从系统的角度(即系统的包容性)对包容性进行了概念化,并将全球创新系统(GIS)作为概念框架。该分析基于一个行动者网络地图,该地图包括创新项目和行动者,该地图通过应用社会技术配置分析(STCA)从经验数据中得出。这组作者发现,应该通过承认CRISPR鲑鱼创新是在以市场为基础的GIS中进行的来解决纳入问题。这意味着应该优先考虑“自由”知识,以便理解CRISPR创新旨在解决的问题以及它所隐含的风险类型,但也应该优先考虑当地估值,以便建立一个功能性的法律和市场结构以及当地的社会关注。作者得出结论,这种方法是必要的,因为尽管人们认识到,在使用CRISPR技术进行创新时,需要战略性地包含新的和不同的观点,但在定义应该包括谁以及为什么要包括的策略时,没有明确的理由可以帮助确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inclusion in the global innovation system for CRISPR salmon in Norway
ABSTRACT The aim of the paper is to determine how inclusion, as understood in the literature on responsible research and innovation (RRI), should be acknowledged in the global innovation system in Norway for CRISPR salmon. The authors conceptualize inclusion from a systems perspective (i.e., systemic inclusion) and use global innovation systems (GIS) as a conceptual framework. The analysis is based on an actor-network map comprising innovation projects and actors drawn from empirical data by applying socio-technical configuration analysis (STCA). The authors find that inclusion should be addressed by acknowledging that CRISPR salmon innovation is performed in a market-anchored GIS. This means that “footloose” knowledge should be prioritized in order to understand the problems that CRISPR innovation aims to tackle and the type of risks that it implies, but also that local valuations should be prioritized in order to build a functional legal and market structure along with local social concerns. The authors conclude that the approach is necessary because although it is recognized that the inclusion of new and diverse perspectives needs to be done strategically when innovating with CRISPR technology, there is no clear rationale that can help when defining a strategy for who should be included and why.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Rescaling wind energy governance – the dynamic interplay between efficiency and justice in energy policy constructions Green innovative procurement in the municipality sector: A dual case study from Norway Magne Helvig 1926–2024 Collaborative routes to innovation success in the periphery – a configurational approach A missed opportunity to implement a 3D digital twin in strategic planning in the Ålesund region, Norway: What to blame?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1