奥雷里奥·利波·布兰多里尼的《共和国与王国的比较》及人文主义君主主义的悖论

IF 0.1 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES I Tatti Studies Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.1086/710759
Hanan Yoran
{"title":"奥雷里奥·利波·布兰多里尼的《共和国与王国的比较》及人文主义君主主义的悖论","authors":"Hanan Yoran","doi":"10.1086/710759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"HANS BARON ’S SEMINAL THESIS on Florentine civic humanism has engendered several fruitful historical and theoretical debates. By now one of Baron’s claims, namely, that fifteenth-century humanists affirmed the vivere civile, has been almost universally accepted. However, most scholars of humanism have rejected Baron’s key argument about the intrinsic relationship between this commitment to active citizenship and the republican political ideology that he attributed to the civic humanists. Studies on humanism in its various political contexts seem to have conclusively disproved Baron’s argument concerning republicanism. They have demonstrated that humanists in aristocratic Venice, despotic Milan, theocratic Rome, and monarchical Naples (to name only the most important humanist centers in quattrocento Italy) strongly favored public activity while propagating the dominant political ideology of their given polity.","PeriodicalId":42173,"journal":{"name":"I Tatti Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aurelio Lippo Brandolini’s Republics and Kingdoms Compared and the Paradoxes of Humanist Monarchism\",\"authors\":\"Hanan Yoran\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/710759\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"HANS BARON ’S SEMINAL THESIS on Florentine civic humanism has engendered several fruitful historical and theoretical debates. By now one of Baron’s claims, namely, that fifteenth-century humanists affirmed the vivere civile, has been almost universally accepted. However, most scholars of humanism have rejected Baron’s key argument about the intrinsic relationship between this commitment to active citizenship and the republican political ideology that he attributed to the civic humanists. Studies on humanism in its various political contexts seem to have conclusively disproved Baron’s argument concerning republicanism. They have demonstrated that humanists in aristocratic Venice, despotic Milan, theocratic Rome, and monarchical Naples (to name only the most important humanist centers in quattrocento Italy) strongly favored public activity while propagating the dominant political ideology of their given polity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"I Tatti Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"I Tatti Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/710759\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"I Tatti Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/710759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

汉斯·巴伦关于佛罗伦萨公民人文主义的开创性论文引发了几次卓有成效的历史和理论辩论。到目前为止,巴伦的主张之一,即15世纪的人文主义者肯定了文明的生命力,几乎已被普遍接受。然而,大多数人文主义学者拒绝了巴伦的关键论点,即对积极公民的承诺与他归因于公民人文主义者的共和政治意识形态之间的内在关系。对人文主义在不同政治背景下的研究似乎已经彻底否定了巴伦关于共和主义的论点。他们证明了人文主义者在贵族的威尼斯、专制的米兰、神权的罗马和君主的那不勒斯(仅列举四世纪意大利最重要的人文主义中心)强烈支持公共活动,同时宣传其给定政体的主导政治意识形态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aurelio Lippo Brandolini’s Republics and Kingdoms Compared and the Paradoxes of Humanist Monarchism
HANS BARON ’S SEMINAL THESIS on Florentine civic humanism has engendered several fruitful historical and theoretical debates. By now one of Baron’s claims, namely, that fifteenth-century humanists affirmed the vivere civile, has been almost universally accepted. However, most scholars of humanism have rejected Baron’s key argument about the intrinsic relationship between this commitment to active citizenship and the republican political ideology that he attributed to the civic humanists. Studies on humanism in its various political contexts seem to have conclusively disproved Baron’s argument concerning republicanism. They have demonstrated that humanists in aristocratic Venice, despotic Milan, theocratic Rome, and monarchical Naples (to name only the most important humanist centers in quattrocento Italy) strongly favored public activity while propagating the dominant political ideology of their given polity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
I Tatti Studies
I Tatti Studies MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Caravaggio, Alberti, and Narcissan Disegno Editor’s Note Islands in Flux: Migration and Ecological Change in Early Modern Isolari (Books of Islands) Cellini’s Dog Parchment, Gilding, and God: Gold Leaf and Divine Connection in a Camaldolese Choir Book
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1