向断点努力:职业网球和日益严重的雇员和独立承包商分类错误的问题

E. Priest
{"title":"向断点努力:职业网球和日益严重的雇员和独立承包商分类错误的问题","authors":"E. Priest","doi":"10.25172/smulr.75.4.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An often overlooked yet extremely pressing issue in the U.S. economy is the misclassification of workers as independent contractors when they are actually employees. Because of such misclassifications, workers are denied their rights to federal antidiscrimination protections and the ability to collectively bargain through unions. Courts across the country utilize a variety of legal tests to determine if a worker is an employee or an independent contractor. The three most important legal tests are the right to control test, the economic realities test, and the ABC test. Using men’s professional tennis as a case study, this Comment argues for the uniform adoption of the ABC test. As a pertinent example, tennis players are incorrectly classified as independent contractors under current legal frameworks. The ABC test provides the best answer to the independent contractor problem because it is the most straightforward, adaptable, and beneficial for both employers and workers.","PeriodicalId":80169,"journal":{"name":"SMU law review : a publication of Southern Methodist University School of Law","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Working Toward Break Point: Professional Tennis and the Growing Problem with Employee and Independent Contractor Misclassifications\",\"authors\":\"E. Priest\",\"doi\":\"10.25172/smulr.75.4.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An often overlooked yet extremely pressing issue in the U.S. economy is the misclassification of workers as independent contractors when they are actually employees. Because of such misclassifications, workers are denied their rights to federal antidiscrimination protections and the ability to collectively bargain through unions. Courts across the country utilize a variety of legal tests to determine if a worker is an employee or an independent contractor. The three most important legal tests are the right to control test, the economic realities test, and the ABC test. Using men’s professional tennis as a case study, this Comment argues for the uniform adoption of the ABC test. As a pertinent example, tennis players are incorrectly classified as independent contractors under current legal frameworks. The ABC test provides the best answer to the independent contractor problem because it is the most straightforward, adaptable, and beneficial for both employers and workers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":80169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SMU law review : a publication of Southern Methodist University School of Law\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SMU law review : a publication of Southern Methodist University School of Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25172/smulr.75.4.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SMU law review : a publication of Southern Methodist University School of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25172/smulr.75.4.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国经济中一个经常被忽视但又极其紧迫的问题是,当工人实际上是雇员时,他们被错误地归类为独立承包商。由于这种错误的分类,工人被剥夺了获得联邦反歧视保护的权利,以及通过工会进行集体谈判的能力。全国各地的法院使用各种法律测试来确定工人是雇员还是独立承包商。三个最重要的法律检验是控制权检验、经济现实检验和ABC检验。本文以男子职业网球为例,论证了统一采用ABC测试的必要性。举个相关的例子,在现行法律框架下,网球运动员被错误地归类为独立承包商。ABC测试为独立承包人问题提供了最好的答案,因为它最直接,适应性强,对雇主和工人都有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Working Toward Break Point: Professional Tennis and the Growing Problem with Employee and Independent Contractor Misclassifications
An often overlooked yet extremely pressing issue in the U.S. economy is the misclassification of workers as independent contractors when they are actually employees. Because of such misclassifications, workers are denied their rights to federal antidiscrimination protections and the ability to collectively bargain through unions. Courts across the country utilize a variety of legal tests to determine if a worker is an employee or an independent contractor. The three most important legal tests are the right to control test, the economic realities test, and the ABC test. Using men’s professional tennis as a case study, this Comment argues for the uniform adoption of the ABC test. As a pertinent example, tennis players are incorrectly classified as independent contractors under current legal frameworks. The ABC test provides the best answer to the independent contractor problem because it is the most straightforward, adaptable, and beneficial for both employers and workers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pregnancy Risk and Coerced Interventions after Dobbs Using a “Bystander Bounty” to Encourage the Reporting of Workplace Sexual Harassment A Tribute for Professor Lowe The Promise of Abortion Pills: Evidence on the Safety and Effectiveness of Self-Managed Medication Abortion and Opportunities to Expand Access Fracture: Abortion Law and Politics After Dobbs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1