审计综合中风治疗以支持质量改进活动:建立点对点审计框架

IF 0.8 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Integrated Care Pub Date : 2022-01-06 DOI:10.1108/jica-06-2021-0033
B. Buijck, B. Vrijhoef, Monique Bergsma, D. Dippel
{"title":"审计综合中风治疗以支持质量改进活动:建立点对点审计框架","authors":"B. Buijck, B. Vrijhoef, Monique Bergsma, D. Dippel","doi":"10.1108/jica-06-2021-0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeTo organize stroke care, multiple stakeholders work closely together in integrated stroke care services (ISCS). However, even a well-developed integrated care program needs a continuous quality improvement (CQI) cycle. The current paper aims to describe the development of a unique peer-to-peer audit framework, the development model for integrated care (DMIC), the Dutch stroke care standard and benchmark indicators for stroke.Design/methodology/approachA group of experts was brought together in 2016 to discuss the aims and principles of a national audit framework. The steering group quality assurance (SGQA) consisted of representatives of a diversity of professions in the field of stroke care in the Netherlands, including managers, nurses, medical specialists and paramedics.FindingsAuditors, coordinators and professionals evaluated the framework, agreed on that the framework was easy to use and valued the interesting and enjoyable audits, the compliments, feedback and fruitful insights. Participants consider that a quality label may help to overcome necessity issues and have health care insurers on board. Finally, a structured improvement plan after the audit is needed.Originality/valueAn audit offers fruitful insights into the functioning of an ISCS and the collaboration therein. Best practices and points of improvement are revealed and can fuel collaboration and the development of partnerships. Innovative cure and care may lead to an increasing area of support among professionals in the ISCS and consequently lead to improved quality of delivered stroke care.","PeriodicalId":51837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrated Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Auditing integrated stroke care to support quality improvement activities: development of a peer-to-peer audit framework\",\"authors\":\"B. Buijck, B. Vrijhoef, Monique Bergsma, D. Dippel\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jica-06-2021-0033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeTo organize stroke care, multiple stakeholders work closely together in integrated stroke care services (ISCS). However, even a well-developed integrated care program needs a continuous quality improvement (CQI) cycle. The current paper aims to describe the development of a unique peer-to-peer audit framework, the development model for integrated care (DMIC), the Dutch stroke care standard and benchmark indicators for stroke.Design/methodology/approachA group of experts was brought together in 2016 to discuss the aims and principles of a national audit framework. The steering group quality assurance (SGQA) consisted of representatives of a diversity of professions in the field of stroke care in the Netherlands, including managers, nurses, medical specialists and paramedics.FindingsAuditors, coordinators and professionals evaluated the framework, agreed on that the framework was easy to use and valued the interesting and enjoyable audits, the compliments, feedback and fruitful insights. Participants consider that a quality label may help to overcome necessity issues and have health care insurers on board. Finally, a structured improvement plan after the audit is needed.Originality/valueAn audit offers fruitful insights into the functioning of an ISCS and the collaboration therein. Best practices and points of improvement are revealed and can fuel collaboration and the development of partnerships. Innovative cure and care may lead to an increasing area of support among professionals in the ISCS and consequently lead to improved quality of delivered stroke care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Integrated Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Integrated Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jica-06-2021-0033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrated Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jica-06-2021-0033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在卒中综合护理服务(ISCS)中,多方利益相关者密切合作,组织卒中护理。然而,即使是一个完善的综合护理项目也需要一个持续的质量改进(CQI)周期。当前的论文旨在描述一个独特的点对点审计框架的发展,综合护理(DMIC)的发展模式,荷兰卒中护理标准和卒中基准指标。2016年,一组专家齐聚一堂,讨论国家审计框架的目标和原则。质量保证指导小组(SGQA)由荷兰中风护理领域各种专业的代表组成,包括管理人员、护士、医学专家和辅助医务人员。审核员、协调员和专业人员对该框架进行了评估,一致认为该框架易于使用,并重视有趣和愉快的审核、赞扬、反馈和富有成效的见解。与会者认为,质量标签可能有助于克服必需品问题,并使医疗保险公司参与其中。最后,需要在审核后制定结构化的改进计划。独创性/价值审计提供了对独立审计系统的运作和其中的合作的富有成效的见解。揭示了最佳实践和改进点,可以促进协作和伙伴关系的发展。创新的治疗和护理可能会增加ISCS专业人员的支持领域,从而提高卒中护理的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Auditing integrated stroke care to support quality improvement activities: development of a peer-to-peer audit framework
PurposeTo organize stroke care, multiple stakeholders work closely together in integrated stroke care services (ISCS). However, even a well-developed integrated care program needs a continuous quality improvement (CQI) cycle. The current paper aims to describe the development of a unique peer-to-peer audit framework, the development model for integrated care (DMIC), the Dutch stroke care standard and benchmark indicators for stroke.Design/methodology/approachA group of experts was brought together in 2016 to discuss the aims and principles of a national audit framework. The steering group quality assurance (SGQA) consisted of representatives of a diversity of professions in the field of stroke care in the Netherlands, including managers, nurses, medical specialists and paramedics.FindingsAuditors, coordinators and professionals evaluated the framework, agreed on that the framework was easy to use and valued the interesting and enjoyable audits, the compliments, feedback and fruitful insights. Participants consider that a quality label may help to overcome necessity issues and have health care insurers on board. Finally, a structured improvement plan after the audit is needed.Originality/valueAn audit offers fruitful insights into the functioning of an ISCS and the collaboration therein. Best practices and points of improvement are revealed and can fuel collaboration and the development of partnerships. Innovative cure and care may lead to an increasing area of support among professionals in the ISCS and consequently lead to improved quality of delivered stroke care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Integrated Care
Journal of Integrated Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Integrated care’s missing piece: the US experience Concept analysis of patient journey disruptions: the obstacle of integrated care Community-engaged co-design of a quality improvement capacity building program within an integrated health system in Ontario, Canada Commissioning for integration: exploring the dynamics of the “subsidy tables” approach in Dutch social care delivery Reimagining chronic pain management: the case for integrated care in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1