偶然还是认知?组织与技术研究的两条路径

Jan Löwstedt
{"title":"偶然还是认知?组织与技术研究的两条路径","authors":"Jan Löwstedt","doi":"10.1016/0281-7527(85)90008-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article reviews and criticizes the treatment of the concepts of technology in organization theories. It pays special attention to how authors of the contingency school interpret empirical results concerning relationships between technology and organization structure. When authors have encountered contradictory results, they attempt to find flaws in previous research and to ask for methodologically more precise research. As this way of dealing with anomalies yields little fruit in the long run, organization theorists need new frameworks for investigating the significance of technology for the design of organizations. An actor-oriented approach can frame investigations into the cognitive processes dissolving or modifying the relationships.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101144,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0281-7527(85)90008-8","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contingencies or cognitions? Two paths for research on organization and technology\",\"authors\":\"Jan Löwstedt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0281-7527(85)90008-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This article reviews and criticizes the treatment of the concepts of technology in organization theories. It pays special attention to how authors of the contingency school interpret empirical results concerning relationships between technology and organization structure. When authors have encountered contradictory results, they attempt to find flaws in previous research and to ask for methodologically more precise research. As this way of dealing with anomalies yields little fruit in the long run, organization theorists need new frameworks for investigating the significance of technology for the design of organizations. An actor-oriented approach can frame investigations into the cognitive processes dissolving or modifying the relationships.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1985-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0281-7527(85)90008-8\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0281752785900088\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0281752785900088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

本文对组织理论中对技术概念的处理进行了回顾和批判。它特别关注偶然性学派的作者如何解释关于技术与组织结构之间关系的实证结果。当作者遇到相互矛盾的结果时,他们试图找出先前研究中的缺陷,并要求在方法上进行更精确的研究。由于这种处理异常的方式从长远来看收效甚微,组织理论家需要新的框架来研究技术对组织设计的意义。面向行为者的方法可以将调查框架纳入消解或修改关系的认知过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Contingencies or cognitions? Two paths for research on organization and technology

This article reviews and criticizes the treatment of the concepts of technology in organization theories. It pays special attention to how authors of the contingency school interpret empirical results concerning relationships between technology and organization structure. When authors have encountered contradictory results, they attempt to find flaws in previous research and to ask for methodologically more precise research. As this way of dealing with anomalies yields little fruit in the long run, organization theorists need new frameworks for investigating the significance of technology for the design of organizations. An actor-oriented approach can frame investigations into the cognitive processes dissolving or modifying the relationships.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Emerging strategies in a network context: The Volvo case Public choice, ambiguity and regulation Organizational responses to a revolutionary environment: The case of Iran Erwin Groachla 1921–1986
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1