三种不同根状牙本质树脂基根管密封剂抗脱位性的体外研究。

Suchita Vishnoi, Deepak Raisingani, A. Prasad, Harshit Srivastava, Rimjhim Jain, Archana Singh
{"title":"三种不同根状牙本质树脂基根管密封剂抗脱位性的体外研究。","authors":"Suchita Vishnoi, Deepak Raisingani, A. Prasad, Harshit Srivastava, Rimjhim Jain, Archana Singh","doi":"10.21276//ujds.2023.9.1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"  \nAim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the dislocation resistance of three different resin-based root canal sealers from radicular dentin -An ‘in vitro’ study. \nMethodology: Sixty extracted human maxillary canines were sectioned transversally below the cement-enamel junction to obtain 2-mm-thick dentin disks that were randomly divided into three groups (n = 20) for treatment with one of three different root-canal sealers (AH Plus [Dentsply DeTroy, Germany], Bioseal (Equinox Holland), EndoREZ [Ultra dent]). Standardized cavities were prepared to simulate root canals, cavities were filled with sealer material, and push-out bond-strength testing was performed using a universal testing machine. \nResult: In the present study amongst all the three sealers tested viz AH Plus, EndoREZ & Bioseal. EndoREZ (Group III) goes most superior (14.97 ± 3.17 MPa), followed by AH Plus (Group II) (13.29 ± 2.27 MPa) & the least bond strength was seen with Bioseal (Group I) (4.83 ± 1.62 MPa). \nThere was a gradual decrease in bond strength from a coronal third of radicular dentin to the middle third followed by an apical third in all three groups. \nConclusion: Amongst all the three-sealer tested EndoREZ® gave the maximum bond strength, followed by AH Plus® & then Bioseal. Bioseal gave the least bond strength irrespective of the area in radicular dentin. There was a gradual decrease in bond strength from the coronal third of radicular dentin to the middle third followed by an apical third in all three groups.","PeriodicalId":100856,"journal":{"name":"King Saud University Journal of Dental Sciences","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of dislocation resistance of three different resin-based root canal sealers from radicular dentin -An ‘in vitro’ study.\",\"authors\":\"Suchita Vishnoi, Deepak Raisingani, A. Prasad, Harshit Srivastava, Rimjhim Jain, Archana Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.21276//ujds.2023.9.1.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"  \\nAim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the dislocation resistance of three different resin-based root canal sealers from radicular dentin -An ‘in vitro’ study. \\nMethodology: Sixty extracted human maxillary canines were sectioned transversally below the cement-enamel junction to obtain 2-mm-thick dentin disks that were randomly divided into three groups (n = 20) for treatment with one of three different root-canal sealers (AH Plus [Dentsply DeTroy, Germany], Bioseal (Equinox Holland), EndoREZ [Ultra dent]). Standardized cavities were prepared to simulate root canals, cavities were filled with sealer material, and push-out bond-strength testing was performed using a universal testing machine. \\nResult: In the present study amongst all the three sealers tested viz AH Plus, EndoREZ & Bioseal. EndoREZ (Group III) goes most superior (14.97 ± 3.17 MPa), followed by AH Plus (Group II) (13.29 ± 2.27 MPa) & the least bond strength was seen with Bioseal (Group I) (4.83 ± 1.62 MPa). \\nThere was a gradual decrease in bond strength from a coronal third of radicular dentin to the middle third followed by an apical third in all three groups. \\nConclusion: Amongst all the three-sealer tested EndoREZ® gave the maximum bond strength, followed by AH Plus® & then Bioseal. Bioseal gave the least bond strength irrespective of the area in radicular dentin. There was a gradual decrease in bond strength from the coronal third of radicular dentin to the middle third followed by an apical third in all three groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":100856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"King Saud University Journal of Dental Sciences\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"King Saud University Journal of Dental Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21276//ujds.2023.9.1.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"King Saud University Journal of Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21276//ujds.2023.9.1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估三种不同根状牙本质树脂基根管密封剂的抗脱位性-体外研究。方法:将60只拔出的上颌犬在牙髓-牙釉质交界处下方横切,获得2mm厚的牙本质盘,随机分为三组(n = 20),分别使用三种不同的根管密封剂(AH Plus [Dentsply DeTroy,德国],Bioseal (Equinox Holland), EndoREZ [Ultra dent])中的一种进行治疗。制作模拟根管的标准化空腔,用密封材料填充空腔,并使用通用试验机进行推出粘结强度测试。结果:在目前的研究中,在所有三种密封测试中,即AH Plus, EndoREZ和Bioseal。EndoREZ (III组)结合强度最高(14.97±3.17 MPa), AH Plus (II组)次之(13.29±2.27 MPa), Bioseal (I组)结合强度最低(4.83±1.62 MPa)。根状牙本质的结合强度从冠状的三分之一到中间的三分之一逐渐下降,然后是根尖的三分之一。结论:在所有测试的三种密封剂中,EndoREZ®的结合强度最大,其次是AH Plus®,然后是Bioseal。与根状牙本质的面积无关,生物胶的结合强度最低。根状牙本质的结合强度从冠状的三分之一到中间的三分之一逐渐下降,其次是根尖的三分之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of dislocation resistance of three different resin-based root canal sealers from radicular dentin -An ‘in vitro’ study.
  Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the dislocation resistance of three different resin-based root canal sealers from radicular dentin -An ‘in vitro’ study. Methodology: Sixty extracted human maxillary canines were sectioned transversally below the cement-enamel junction to obtain 2-mm-thick dentin disks that were randomly divided into three groups (n = 20) for treatment with one of three different root-canal sealers (AH Plus [Dentsply DeTroy, Germany], Bioseal (Equinox Holland), EndoREZ [Ultra dent]). Standardized cavities were prepared to simulate root canals, cavities were filled with sealer material, and push-out bond-strength testing was performed using a universal testing machine. Result: In the present study amongst all the three sealers tested viz AH Plus, EndoREZ & Bioseal. EndoREZ (Group III) goes most superior (14.97 ± 3.17 MPa), followed by AH Plus (Group II) (13.29 ± 2.27 MPa) & the least bond strength was seen with Bioseal (Group I) (4.83 ± 1.62 MPa). There was a gradual decrease in bond strength from a coronal third of radicular dentin to the middle third followed by an apical third in all three groups. Conclusion: Amongst all the three-sealer tested EndoREZ® gave the maximum bond strength, followed by AH Plus® & then Bioseal. Bioseal gave the least bond strength irrespective of the area in radicular dentin. There was a gradual decrease in bond strength from the coronal third of radicular dentin to the middle third followed by an apical third in all three groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Comprehensive Review of Surface Coatings for enhancement of Anti-Microbial and Anti-Corrosive Properties of Titanium Implant Surface Unusually Large Radicular Cyst of Mandible: A Rare Case Report Revisiting “Plaque Free Zone”- Island of Peace in a Zone of Conflict: A stereomicroscopic study Misdiagnosed Case Management of Dens Invaginatus Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography- A Case Report Comparison of the Effect of Various Surface Treatments on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Lithium Disilicate Ceramic with Dentin- An In-vitro Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1