基于空间主体的模型的方法问题

S. Manson, Li An, K. Clarke, A. Heppenstall, J. Koch, B. Krzyzanowski, Fraser J. Morgan, David O’Sullivan, Bryan C. Runck, Eric Shook, L. Tesfatsion
{"title":"基于空间主体的模型的方法问题","authors":"S. Manson, Li An, K. Clarke, A. Heppenstall, J. Koch, B. Krzyzanowski, Fraser J. Morgan, David O’Sullivan, Bryan C. Runck, Eric Shook, L. Tesfatsion","doi":"10.18564/jasss.4174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Agent based modeling (ABM) is a standard tool that is useful across many disciplines. Despite widespread and mounting interest in ABM, even broader adoption has been hindered by a set of methodological challenges that run from issues around basic tools to the need for a more complete conceptual foundation for the approach. After several decades of progress, ABMs remain difficult to develop and use for many students, scholars, and policy makers. This difficulty holds especially true for models designed to represent spatial patterns and processes across a broad range of human, natural, and human-environment systems. In this paper, we describe the methodological challenges facing further development and use of spatial ABM (SABM) and suggest some potential solutions from multiple disciplines. We first define SABM to narrow our object of inquiry, and then explore how spatiality is a source of both advantages and challenges. We examine how time interacts with space in models and delve into issues of model development in general and modeling frameworks and tools specifically. We draw on lessons and insights from fields with a history of ABM contributions, including economics, ecology, geography, ecology, anthropology, and spatial science with the goal of identifying promising ways forward for this powerful means of modeling.","PeriodicalId":14675,"journal":{"name":"J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methodological Issues of Spatial Agent-Based Models\",\"authors\":\"S. Manson, Li An, K. Clarke, A. Heppenstall, J. Koch, B. Krzyzanowski, Fraser J. Morgan, David O’Sullivan, Bryan C. Runck, Eric Shook, L. Tesfatsion\",\"doi\":\"10.18564/jasss.4174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Agent based modeling (ABM) is a standard tool that is useful across many disciplines. Despite widespread and mounting interest in ABM, even broader adoption has been hindered by a set of methodological challenges that run from issues around basic tools to the need for a more complete conceptual foundation for the approach. After several decades of progress, ABMs remain difficult to develop and use for many students, scholars, and policy makers. This difficulty holds especially true for models designed to represent spatial patterns and processes across a broad range of human, natural, and human-environment systems. In this paper, we describe the methodological challenges facing further development and use of spatial ABM (SABM) and suggest some potential solutions from multiple disciplines. We first define SABM to narrow our object of inquiry, and then explore how spatiality is a source of both advantages and challenges. We examine how time interacts with space in models and delve into issues of model development in general and modeling frameworks and tools specifically. We draw on lessons and insights from fields with a history of ABM contributions, including economics, ecology, geography, ecology, anthropology, and spatial science with the goal of identifying promising ways forward for this powerful means of modeling.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"32\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.4174\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.4174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

摘要

基于代理的建模(ABM)是一种适用于许多学科的标准工具。尽管人们对ABM的兴趣越来越广泛,但更广泛的采用受到了一系列方法论挑战的阻碍,这些挑战从围绕基本工具的问题到需要为该方法提供更完整的概念基础。经过几十年的发展,对于许多学生、学者和决策者来说,ABMs仍然难以开发和使用。这一困难尤其适用于设计用来表示跨越广泛的人类、自然和人类环境系统的空间模式和过程的模型。在本文中,我们描述了空间ABM (SABM)进一步发展和使用所面临的方法挑战,并提出了一些来自多学科的潜在解决方案。我们首先定义SABM以缩小我们的研究对象,然后探索空间性如何成为优势和挑战的来源。我们研究时间如何与模型中的空间相互作用,并深入研究一般模型开发和具体建模框架和工具的问题。我们从具有ABM贡献历史的领域中吸取教训和见解,包括经济学、生态学、地理学、生态学、人类学和空间科学,目的是为这种强大的建模手段确定有希望的前进道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Methodological Issues of Spatial Agent-Based Models
Agent based modeling (ABM) is a standard tool that is useful across many disciplines. Despite widespread and mounting interest in ABM, even broader adoption has been hindered by a set of methodological challenges that run from issues around basic tools to the need for a more complete conceptual foundation for the approach. After several decades of progress, ABMs remain difficult to develop and use for many students, scholars, and policy makers. This difficulty holds especially true for models designed to represent spatial patterns and processes across a broad range of human, natural, and human-environment systems. In this paper, we describe the methodological challenges facing further development and use of spatial ABM (SABM) and suggest some potential solutions from multiple disciplines. We first define SABM to narrow our object of inquiry, and then explore how spatiality is a source of both advantages and challenges. We examine how time interacts with space in models and delve into issues of model development in general and modeling frameworks and tools specifically. We draw on lessons and insights from fields with a history of ABM contributions, including economics, ecology, geography, ecology, anthropology, and spatial science with the goal of identifying promising ways forward for this powerful means of modeling.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conflicting Information and Compliance with COVID-19 Behavioral Recommendations Particle Swarm Optimization for Calibration in Spatially Explicit Agent-Based Modeling The Role of Reinforcement Learning in the Emergence of Conventions: Simulation Experiments with the Repeated Volunteer's Dilemma Generation of Synthetic Populations in Social Simulations: A Review of Methods and Practices An Integrated Ecological-Social Simulation Model of Farmer Decisions and Cropping System Performance in the Rolling Pampas (Argentina)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1