2018年加州野火:探讨对危机沟通和潜在过程的反应中的性别差异

IF 0.7 Q3 COMMUNICATION Atlantic Journal of Communication Pub Date : 2023-02-07 DOI:10.1080/15456870.2023.2173363
Kenneth A. Lachlan, Christine Gilbert, Emily Hutter, Patric R. Spence
{"title":"2018年加州野火:探讨对危机沟通和潜在过程的反应中的性别差异","authors":"Kenneth A. Lachlan, Christine Gilbert, Emily Hutter, Patric R. Spence","doi":"10.1080/15456870.2023.2173363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A sizable body of research has explored information seeking processes during crises and disasters, including the ways in which people seek mediated information to help make sense of the event and take action. Much of this research has postulated that information seeking is used as a mechanism for stress reduction, and that sex differences exist in terms of information seeking and risk perceptions. The current study attempted to explicate these links in the context of the 2018 California wildfires. While evidence was found for differential patterns of information seeking across sex and degree of risk perception, evidence did not support the notion that aggregate information seeking leads to a reduction in stress. Alternative theoretical explanations for sex differences in crisis information seeking and stress responses are proposed and discussed, as are implications for crisis managers and emergency responders.","PeriodicalId":45354,"journal":{"name":"Atlantic Journal of Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The 2018 California wildfires: examining sex differences in response to crisis communication and underlying processes\",\"authors\":\"Kenneth A. Lachlan, Christine Gilbert, Emily Hutter, Patric R. Spence\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15456870.2023.2173363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT A sizable body of research has explored information seeking processes during crises and disasters, including the ways in which people seek mediated information to help make sense of the event and take action. Much of this research has postulated that information seeking is used as a mechanism for stress reduction, and that sex differences exist in terms of information seeking and risk perceptions. The current study attempted to explicate these links in the context of the 2018 California wildfires. While evidence was found for differential patterns of information seeking across sex and degree of risk perception, evidence did not support the notion that aggregate information seeking leads to a reduction in stress. Alternative theoretical explanations for sex differences in crisis information seeking and stress responses are proposed and discussed, as are implications for crisis managers and emergency responders.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atlantic Journal of Communication\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atlantic Journal of Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2023.2173363\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atlantic Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2023.2173363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大量的研究探索了危机和灾难期间的信息寻求过程,包括人们寻求中介信息以帮助理解事件并采取行动的方式。大部分研究都假设信息寻求被用作减轻压力的一种机制,并且在信息寻求和风险感知方面存在性别差异。目前的研究试图在2018年加州野火的背景下解释这些联系。虽然有证据表明不同性别和风险感知程度的信息寻求模式存在差异,但证据并不支持汇总信息寻求导致压力减少的观点。提出并讨论了危机信息寻求和压力反应中性别差异的其他理论解释,以及对危机管理人员和应急响应者的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The 2018 California wildfires: examining sex differences in response to crisis communication and underlying processes
ABSTRACT A sizable body of research has explored information seeking processes during crises and disasters, including the ways in which people seek mediated information to help make sense of the event and take action. Much of this research has postulated that information seeking is used as a mechanism for stress reduction, and that sex differences exist in terms of information seeking and risk perceptions. The current study attempted to explicate these links in the context of the 2018 California wildfires. While evidence was found for differential patterns of information seeking across sex and degree of risk perception, evidence did not support the notion that aggregate information seeking leads to a reduction in stress. Alternative theoretical explanations for sex differences in crisis information seeking and stress responses are proposed and discussed, as are implications for crisis managers and emergency responders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Current cases of and motivations for second screen use by generation Z: university students Everyday conversations that impact health communication: developing and validating the everyday family health communication measure Don’t try to make me laugh, let me do: persuading employees to action Theories for social justice and reduction of inequalities: a review of freirean communications Development and problems of the national journalistic model of Kazakhstan, considering social, ethical, managerial, and marketing mechanisms of the media environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1