10G网络中TCP拥塞控制算法的比较

Thomas Lukaseder, Leonard Bradatsch, Benjamin Erb, R. V. D. Heijden, F. Kargl
{"title":"10G网络中TCP拥塞控制算法的比较","authors":"Thomas Lukaseder, Leonard Bradatsch, Benjamin Erb, R. V. D. Heijden, F. Kargl","doi":"10.1109/LCN.2016.121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increasing availability of 10G Ethernet network capabilities challenges existing transport layer protocols. As 10G connections gain momentum outside of backbone networks, the choice of appropriate TCP congestion control algorithms becomes even more relevant for networked applications running in environments such as data centers. Therefore, we provide an extensive overview of relevant TCP congestion control algorithms for high-speed environments leveraging 10G. We analyzed and evaluated six TCP variants using a physical network testbed, with a focus on the effects of propagation delay and significant drop rates. The results indicate that of the algorithms compared, BIC is most suitable when no legacy variant is present, CUBIC is suggested otherwise.","PeriodicalId":6864,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE 41st Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN)","volume":"14 1","pages":"706-714"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of TCP Congestion Control Algorithms in 10G Networks\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Lukaseder, Leonard Bradatsch, Benjamin Erb, R. V. D. Heijden, F. Kargl\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LCN.2016.121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The increasing availability of 10G Ethernet network capabilities challenges existing transport layer protocols. As 10G connections gain momentum outside of backbone networks, the choice of appropriate TCP congestion control algorithms becomes even more relevant for networked applications running in environments such as data centers. Therefore, we provide an extensive overview of relevant TCP congestion control algorithms for high-speed environments leveraging 10G. We analyzed and evaluated six TCP variants using a physical network testbed, with a focus on the effects of propagation delay and significant drop rates. The results indicate that of the algorithms compared, BIC is most suitable when no legacy variant is present, CUBIC is suggested otherwise.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE 41st Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"706-714\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"30\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE 41st Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LCN.2016.121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE 41st Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LCN.2016.121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

摘要

10G以太网网络功能的日益可用性对现有的传输层协议提出了挑战。随着10G连接在骨干网络之外的发展势头,选择合适的TCP拥塞控制算法对于在数据中心等环境中运行的网络应用程序变得更加重要。因此,我们对利用10G的高速环境中的相关TCP拥塞控制算法进行了广泛的概述。我们使用物理网络测试平台分析和评估了六种TCP变体,重点关注传播延迟和显著掉包率的影响。结果表明,在没有遗留变量的情况下,BIC算法是最合适的,否则,建议使用CUBIC算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparison of TCP Congestion Control Algorithms in 10G Networks
The increasing availability of 10G Ethernet network capabilities challenges existing transport layer protocols. As 10G connections gain momentum outside of backbone networks, the choice of appropriate TCP congestion control algorithms becomes even more relevant for networked applications running in environments such as data centers. Therefore, we provide an extensive overview of relevant TCP congestion control algorithms for high-speed environments leveraging 10G. We analyzed and evaluated six TCP variants using a physical network testbed, with a focus on the effects of propagation delay and significant drop rates. The results indicate that of the algorithms compared, BIC is most suitable when no legacy variant is present, CUBIC is suggested otherwise.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Message from the General Chair Message from the general chair Best of Both Worlds: Prioritizing Network Coding without Increased Space Complexity Controlling Network Latency in Mixed Hadoop Clusters: Do We Need Active Queue Management? TransFetch: A Viewing Behavior Driven Video Distribution Framework in Public Transport
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1