经济学家哪里出了问题?

Jialiu Lu
{"title":"经济学家哪里出了问题?","authors":"Jialiu Lu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1325903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A logical reflection is given on the storage of economic thought of the market economy. Three systems of economics since Adam Smith are identified on the basis of their assumptions of value. The classical system is separated from the others for its production idea of value in contrast to the market idea of value, which is further discriminated between the scarcity notion and the subjective notion of utility value. As such, there are the Walrasian system of economics and the Marshallian system of economics. For many, the current crisis is not only the catastrophe of the vested interests of the world, but also the failure of the ideology of the market economy. This paper demonstrates it is not exactly the case.","PeriodicalId":11754,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Where it has Gone Wrong with Economists?\",\"authors\":\"Jialiu Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1325903\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A logical reflection is given on the storage of economic thought of the market economy. Three systems of economics since Adam Smith are identified on the basis of their assumptions of value. The classical system is separated from the others for its production idea of value in contrast to the market idea of value, which is further discriminated between the scarcity notion and the subjective notion of utility value. As such, there are the Walrasian system of economics and the Marshallian system of economics. For many, the current crisis is not only the catastrophe of the vested interests of the world, but also the failure of the ideology of the market economy. This paper demonstrates it is not exactly the case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models (Topic)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1325903\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1325903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对市场经济经济思想的蕴藏性进行了逻辑思考。亚当·斯密以来的三种经济学体系是根据它们对价值的假设来确定的。古典体系与其他体系的区别在于其生产价值观念与市场价值观念的对比,并进一步区分了稀缺性价值观念与主观效用价值观念。因此,有瓦尔拉斯的经济学体系和马绍尔的经济学体系。对许多人来说,当前的危机不仅是世界既得利益集团的灾难,也是市场经济意识形态的失败。本文证明情况并非完全如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Where it has Gone Wrong with Economists?
A logical reflection is given on the storage of economic thought of the market economy. Three systems of economics since Adam Smith are identified on the basis of their assumptions of value. The classical system is separated from the others for its production idea of value in contrast to the market idea of value, which is further discriminated between the scarcity notion and the subjective notion of utility value. As such, there are the Walrasian system of economics and the Marshallian system of economics. For many, the current crisis is not only the catastrophe of the vested interests of the world, but also the failure of the ideology of the market economy. This paper demonstrates it is not exactly the case.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Economic Hysteresis and its Modeling Credit Horizons Estimation of Heuristic Switching in Behavioral Macroeconomic Models Coupled Climate-Economy-Ecology (CoCEB) Modeling: A Dynamic Approach Post Keynesian Economics Is Based on Joan Robinson’s Many Canards About Supposed Gaping Holes in Keynes’s Theory: The Real Problem Is Gaping Holes and Gross Ignorance in the Post Keynesian Understanding of Keynes’s a Treatise on Probability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1