晚年家庭建筑:走向五重理论模型

IF 1.8 1区 艺术学 N/A ARCHITECTURE Archnet-IJAR International Journal of Architectural Research Pub Date : 2022-02-01 DOI:10.1108/arch-04-2021-0115
Gwendoline Schaff, Ann Petermans, J. Vanrie, Fabienne Courtejoie, C. Elsen
{"title":"晚年家庭建筑:走向五重理论模型","authors":"Gwendoline Schaff, Ann Petermans, J. Vanrie, Fabienne Courtejoie, C. Elsen","doi":"10.1108/arch-04-2021-0115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeMost older people wish to age “in place”. However, as current housing is mainly unsuitable for later life, architects have a key role to play. Yet, there is little architectural consideration for the notion of “ageing in place” and its various facets, beyond a functional focus. Architects seem to lack support to grasp inhabitants' sensible needs, and thus synergies with other human-centred disciplines could be enlightening. To ensure homes are designed in line with people's wellbeing, the authors aim to provide a state-of-the-art view, as to build a model supporting architects through their understanding of older people-environment relationships.Design/methodology/approachIn this paper, the authors investigate the key concepts that could enrich architects' design approaches on “ageing in place”. A narrative literature review scrutinising English- and French-written publications from the last twenty years in various disciplines was conducted, with a focus on older people and non-institutionalised housing.FindingsThe results highlight five essential perspectives to be taken into account when questioning housing for older people: health, affective, social, built and contextual perspectives. Their meaning and ties are developed and then synthesised into considerations, calling for architectural creativity.Originality/valueThis fivefold theoretical model adds to the existing architectural body of knowledge by adopting a multidisciplinary and multidimensional angle, going beyond the predominantly pragmatic vision associated with ageing. It provides stakeholders in architecture with a fresh and clear insight of meaningful relationships between older people and their residential environment.","PeriodicalId":51801,"journal":{"name":"Archnet-IJAR International Journal of Architectural Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Architecture of home in later life: towards a fivefold theoretical model\",\"authors\":\"Gwendoline Schaff, Ann Petermans, J. Vanrie, Fabienne Courtejoie, C. Elsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/arch-04-2021-0115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeMost older people wish to age “in place”. However, as current housing is mainly unsuitable for later life, architects have a key role to play. Yet, there is little architectural consideration for the notion of “ageing in place” and its various facets, beyond a functional focus. Architects seem to lack support to grasp inhabitants' sensible needs, and thus synergies with other human-centred disciplines could be enlightening. To ensure homes are designed in line with people's wellbeing, the authors aim to provide a state-of-the-art view, as to build a model supporting architects through their understanding of older people-environment relationships.Design/methodology/approachIn this paper, the authors investigate the key concepts that could enrich architects' design approaches on “ageing in place”. A narrative literature review scrutinising English- and French-written publications from the last twenty years in various disciplines was conducted, with a focus on older people and non-institutionalised housing.FindingsThe results highlight five essential perspectives to be taken into account when questioning housing for older people: health, affective, social, built and contextual perspectives. Their meaning and ties are developed and then synthesised into considerations, calling for architectural creativity.Originality/valueThis fivefold theoretical model adds to the existing architectural body of knowledge by adopting a multidisciplinary and multidimensional angle, going beyond the predominantly pragmatic vision associated with ageing. It provides stakeholders in architecture with a fresh and clear insight of meaningful relationships between older people and their residential environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archnet-IJAR International Journal of Architectural Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archnet-IJAR International Journal of Architectural Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/arch-04-2021-0115\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archnet-IJAR International Journal of Architectural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/arch-04-2021-0115","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

大多数老年人希望“原地”老去。然而,由于目前的住房主要不适合以后的生活,建筑师必须发挥关键作用。然而,除了功能焦点之外,很少有建筑考虑“就地老化”的概念及其各个方面。建筑师似乎缺乏支持来把握居民的合理需求,因此与其他以人为中心的学科的协同作用可能是有启发的。为了确保住宅的设计符合人们的福祉,作者的目标是提供一个最先进的观点,并通过建筑师对老年人与环境关系的理解来建立一个模型。设计/方法论/方法在本文中,作者探讨了可以丰富建筑师“就地老化”设计方法的关键概念。对过去二十年来各学科的英语和法语出版物进行了一项叙述性文献审查,重点是老年人和非机构住房。研究结果强调了在质疑老年人住房问题时需要考虑的五个基本观点:健康、情感、社会、建筑和环境观点。它们的意义和联系得到发展,然后综合考虑,呼唤建筑创造力。原创性/价值这个五重理论模型通过采用多学科和多维角度,超越了与老龄化相关的主要实用主义视角,为现有的建筑知识体系增添了新的内容。它为建筑的利益相关者提供了一个关于老年人和他们的居住环境之间有意义的关系的新鲜而清晰的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Architecture of home in later life: towards a fivefold theoretical model
PurposeMost older people wish to age “in place”. However, as current housing is mainly unsuitable for later life, architects have a key role to play. Yet, there is little architectural consideration for the notion of “ageing in place” and its various facets, beyond a functional focus. Architects seem to lack support to grasp inhabitants' sensible needs, and thus synergies with other human-centred disciplines could be enlightening. To ensure homes are designed in line with people's wellbeing, the authors aim to provide a state-of-the-art view, as to build a model supporting architects through their understanding of older people-environment relationships.Design/methodology/approachIn this paper, the authors investigate the key concepts that could enrich architects' design approaches on “ageing in place”. A narrative literature review scrutinising English- and French-written publications from the last twenty years in various disciplines was conducted, with a focus on older people and non-institutionalised housing.FindingsThe results highlight five essential perspectives to be taken into account when questioning housing for older people: health, affective, social, built and contextual perspectives. Their meaning and ties are developed and then synthesised into considerations, calling for architectural creativity.Originality/valueThis fivefold theoretical model adds to the existing architectural body of knowledge by adopting a multidisciplinary and multidimensional angle, going beyond the predominantly pragmatic vision associated with ageing. It provides stakeholders in architecture with a fresh and clear insight of meaningful relationships between older people and their residential environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
35.50%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research is an interdisciplinary scholarly journal of architecture, urban design and planning, and built environment studies. The journal aims at establishing a bridge between theory and practice in these fields. The journal acts as a platform that reports on the latest research findings for examining buildings and urban environments and debates innovative approaches for creating responsive environments. Archnet-IJAR is truly international and aims at strengthening ties between scholars, academics, and practitioners from the global north and the global south with contributors and readers reaching across the boundaries of cultures and geographies.
期刊最新文献
Leaving no one behind: unveiling gaps in inclusive architecture at the UIA World Congress of architects 2023 The cost of universal design for public buildings: exploring a realistic, context-dependent research approach How a high-modernism project in South Korea failed: Sewoon Sangga (1966–1972), the first experimental modern planning Enhancing children's social and cognitive development through play space design Toward smart sustainable cities: assessment of stakeholders' readiness for digital participatory planning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1