创造经济互动与协调理论:主要问题

E. Ustyuzhanina
{"title":"创造经济互动与协调理论:主要问题","authors":"E. Ustyuzhanina","doi":"10.17835/2076-6297.2022.14.1.025-035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper examines the most well-known scientific approaches to interaction between economic agents. The author gives a definition of the term “coordination” and develops criteria for a basic taxonomy of methods of economic interaction. The above-mentioned criteria enable researchers to describe ideal (pure) methods of coordination. These are (a) routines (based on fixed patterns of behaviour), (b) norms (based on formal and informal rules and standards), (c) pricing (based on cost-benefit analysis), (d) roles (based on mutual expectations in a society), (e) administration (based on orders, tasks and instructions), (f) consensus (based on mutual agreement), (g) surveillance (decision-making based on information about other agents). The author explains that interaction between economic agents always rests on a combination of several coordination methods, whereas these combinations vary from one field of interaction to another. The last part of the paper describes the author’s own vision of leading and auxiliary coordination methods that prevail in various fields of interaction under different regulation systems.","PeriodicalId":43842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Institutional Studies","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creating The Theory of Economic Interaction and Coordination: The Main Issues\",\"authors\":\"E. Ustyuzhanina\",\"doi\":\"10.17835/2076-6297.2022.14.1.025-035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper examines the most well-known scientific approaches to interaction between economic agents. The author gives a definition of the term “coordination” and develops criteria for a basic taxonomy of methods of economic interaction. The above-mentioned criteria enable researchers to describe ideal (pure) methods of coordination. These are (a) routines (based on fixed patterns of behaviour), (b) norms (based on formal and informal rules and standards), (c) pricing (based on cost-benefit analysis), (d) roles (based on mutual expectations in a society), (e) administration (based on orders, tasks and instructions), (f) consensus (based on mutual agreement), (g) surveillance (decision-making based on information about other agents). The author explains that interaction between economic agents always rests on a combination of several coordination methods, whereas these combinations vary from one field of interaction to another. The last part of the paper describes the author’s own vision of leading and auxiliary coordination methods that prevail in various fields of interaction under different regulation systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Institutional Studies\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Institutional Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2022.14.1.025-035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Institutional Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2022.14.1.025-035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文考察了研究经济主体之间相互作用的最著名的科学方法。作者给出了“协调”一词的定义,并为经济互动方法的基本分类制定了标准。上述标准使研究人员能够描述理想的(纯粹的)协调方法。这些是(a)惯例(基于固定的行为模式),(b)规范(基于正式和非正式的规则和标准),(c)定价(基于成本效益分析),(d)角色(基于社会中的相互期望),(e)管理(基于命令,任务和指示),(f)共识(基于相互协议),(g)监督(基于其他代理人信息的决策)。作者解释说,经济主体之间的相互作用总是依赖于几种协调方法的组合,而这些组合因相互作用的一个领域而异。文章的最后一部分阐述了笔者对不同规制制度下各领域互动中主导和辅助协调方法的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Creating The Theory of Economic Interaction and Coordination: The Main Issues
The paper examines the most well-known scientific approaches to interaction between economic agents. The author gives a definition of the term “coordination” and develops criteria for a basic taxonomy of methods of economic interaction. The above-mentioned criteria enable researchers to describe ideal (pure) methods of coordination. These are (a) routines (based on fixed patterns of behaviour), (b) norms (based on formal and informal rules and standards), (c) pricing (based on cost-benefit analysis), (d) roles (based on mutual expectations in a society), (e) administration (based on orders, tasks and instructions), (f) consensus (based on mutual agreement), (g) surveillance (decision-making based on information about other agents). The author explains that interaction between economic agents always rests on a combination of several coordination methods, whereas these combinations vary from one field of interaction to another. The last part of the paper describes the author’s own vision of leading and auxiliary coordination methods that prevail in various fields of interaction under different regulation systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
24
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
On Intra-Group Allocative Efficiency of Resources in Industrial Business Models The Role of Non-Rooted Social Institutions in the Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Regional Innovation System Empirical Analysis of Cheating Among Students on the Basis of Surveys Factors of the Emergence of Collective Actions of Russian Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic Budgetary Borrowings and Investments in Russian Regions: Regulatory Issues and Opportunities for Enhancement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1