Bilas Vlatka, Milan Bošnjak, I. Novak
{"title":"Inovacijska izvedba zemalja članica Europske unije","authors":"Bilas Vlatka, Milan Bošnjak, I. Novak","doi":"10.15291/OEC.2836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to show the results of the innovation performance of the member states of the European Union. The most comprehensive insight into the innovation performance of countries is provided by the Global Index of Innovation, the Bloomberg Index of Innovation and the European Innovation Success Scale. These indices have different methodologies for calculating innovation performance of countries, and depending on the type of country index and methodology they produce different results. Comparative analysis of the innovation index has shown that, depending on the type of index and methodology of calculation, the leading countries of the world are Switzerland and South Korea, and the most innovative countries of the European Union are Sweden and the Netherlands. Nevertheless, according to all three indices and methodologies some European Union member states show weak innovation performance, such as Croatia, Bulgaria and Romania. The comparative analysis of the indices in question points to the weakest links of the economy that needs to be strengthened in order to improve the level of innovation and, consequently, competitiveness, which is why the listed results represent guiding and defining principles, guideline priorities and innovation policies measures.","PeriodicalId":55690,"journal":{"name":"Oeconomica Jadertina","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oeconomica Jadertina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15291/OEC.2836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文的目的是展示欧盟成员国创新绩效的结果。全球创新指数(Global Index of innovation)、彭博创新指数(Bloomberg Index of innovation)和欧洲创新成功指数(European innovation Success Scale)提供了对各国创新表现最全面的洞察。这些指数有不同的方法来计算各国的创新绩效,并且根据国家指数和方法的类型,它们产生不同的结果。对创新指数的比较分析表明,根据指数的类型和计算方法,世界领先的国家是瑞士和韩国,欧盟最具创新力的国家是瑞典和荷兰。然而,根据所有三个指数和方法,一些欧盟成员国的创新表现较弱,如克罗地亚、保加利亚和罗马尼亚。对有关指数的比较分析指出了经济中需要加强的最薄弱环节,以提高创新水平,从而提高竞争力,这就是为什么列出的结果代表了指导和确定原则、指导重点和创新政策措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inovacijska izvedba zemalja članica Europske unije
The aim of this paper is to show the results of the innovation performance of the member states of the European Union. The most comprehensive insight into the innovation performance of countries is provided by the Global Index of Innovation, the Bloomberg Index of Innovation and the European Innovation Success Scale. These indices have different methodologies for calculating innovation performance of countries, and depending on the type of country index and methodology they produce different results. Comparative analysis of the innovation index has shown that, depending on the type of index and methodology of calculation, the leading countries of the world are Switzerland and South Korea, and the most innovative countries of the European Union are Sweden and the Netherlands. Nevertheless, according to all three indices and methodologies some European Union member states show weak innovation performance, such as Croatia, Bulgaria and Romania. The comparative analysis of the indices in question points to the weakest links of the economy that needs to be strengthened in order to improve the level of innovation and, consequently, competitiveness, which is why the listed results represent guiding and defining principles, guideline priorities and innovation policies measures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Using Mutual Information and Information Gain Ratios on Entrepreneurial Research: An Empirical Case for Greek I.T. Start-Ups Koncept ekonomije dijeljenja – pogled iz različitih perspektiva Energija i gospodarski rast Internal Audit in Public Hospitals: the case of Greece Croatian hotel managers’ attitudes towards environmental management systems: perceived benefits and barriers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1