六组患者的罗夏- cs评分:在长期精神分析心理治疗和精神分析之前,之后和两年后进行评估

Q3 Psychology Rorschachiana Pub Date : 2013-06-03 DOI:10.1027/1192-5604/A000039
C. Berghout, Jolien Zevalkink, Abraham N. J. Pieters, G. Meyer
{"title":"六组患者的罗夏- cs评分:在长期精神分析心理治疗和精神分析之前,之后和两年后进行评估","authors":"C. Berghout, Jolien Zevalkink, Abraham N. J. Pieters, G. Meyer","doi":"10.1027/1192-5604/A000039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study we used a quasiexperimental, cross-sectional design with six cohorts differing in phase of treatment (pretreatment, posttreatment, 2-year posttreatment) and treatment type (psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic psychotherapy) and investigated scores on 39 Rorschach-CS variables. The total sample consisted of 176 participants from four mental health care organizations in The Netherlands. We first examined pretreatment differences between patients entering psychoanalysis and patients entering psychoanalytic psychotherapy. The two treatment groups did not seem to differ substantially before treatment, with the exception of the level of ideational problems. Next, we studied the outcome of psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic psychotherapy by comparing the Rorschach-CS scores of the six groups of patients. In general, we found significant differences between pretreatment and posttreatment on a relatively small number of Rorschach-CS variables. More pre/post differences were found between the psychoanaly...","PeriodicalId":39365,"journal":{"name":"Rorschachiana","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rorschach-CS scores of six groups of patients: Evaluated before, after and two years after long-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy and psychoanalysis\",\"authors\":\"C. Berghout, Jolien Zevalkink, Abraham N. J. Pieters, G. Meyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1027/1192-5604/A000039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study we used a quasiexperimental, cross-sectional design with six cohorts differing in phase of treatment (pretreatment, posttreatment, 2-year posttreatment) and treatment type (psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic psychotherapy) and investigated scores on 39 Rorschach-CS variables. The total sample consisted of 176 participants from four mental health care organizations in The Netherlands. We first examined pretreatment differences between patients entering psychoanalysis and patients entering psychoanalytic psychotherapy. The two treatment groups did not seem to differ substantially before treatment, with the exception of the level of ideational problems. Next, we studied the outcome of psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic psychotherapy by comparing the Rorschach-CS scores of the six groups of patients. In general, we found significant differences between pretreatment and posttreatment on a relatively small number of Rorschach-CS variables. More pre/post differences were found between the psychoanaly...\",\"PeriodicalId\":39365,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rorschachiana\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rorschachiana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1027/1192-5604/A000039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rorschachiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1192-5604/A000039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在这项研究中,我们采用了准实验的横断面设计,有六个不同治疗阶段(治疗前、治疗后、治疗后2年)和治疗类型(精神分析和精神分析心理治疗)的队列,并调查了39个罗夏- cs变量的得分。总样本包括来自荷兰四个精神卫生保健组织的176名参与者。我们首先检查了进入精神分析的患者和进入精神分析心理治疗的患者之间的预处理差异。除了观念问题的水平外,两个治疗组在治疗前似乎没有实质性的差异。接下来,我们通过比较六组患者的罗夏- cs得分来研究精神分析和精神分析心理治疗的结果。总的来说,我们发现预处理和后处理在相对较少的罗夏- cs变量上存在显著差异。更多的前后差异被发现在精神分析…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rorschach-CS scores of six groups of patients: Evaluated before, after and two years after long-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy and psychoanalysis
In this study we used a quasiexperimental, cross-sectional design with six cohorts differing in phase of treatment (pretreatment, posttreatment, 2-year posttreatment) and treatment type (psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic psychotherapy) and investigated scores on 39 Rorschach-CS variables. The total sample consisted of 176 participants from four mental health care organizations in The Netherlands. We first examined pretreatment differences between patients entering psychoanalysis and patients entering psychoanalytic psychotherapy. The two treatment groups did not seem to differ substantially before treatment, with the exception of the level of ideational problems. Next, we studied the outcome of psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic psychotherapy by comparing the Rorschach-CS scores of the six groups of patients. In general, we found significant differences between pretreatment and posttreatment on a relatively small number of Rorschach-CS variables. More pre/post differences were found between the psychoanaly...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rorschachiana
Rorschachiana Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
When Inkblot Imitates Life – A Case Study of Rorschach Content Analysis The Processometric Consensus Rorschach Test (pCRT-II) – An Improved Evaluation System The Parallel Series – The Behn–Rorschach Inkblot Test The Parallel Series – The Behn–Rorschach Inkblot Test Seeing Eye-to-Eye
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1