荷兰医院的管理

Rebecca van der Pennen, H. Berden, E.C.A. Castelijns, W. L. Vreeman, T. Camps
{"title":"荷兰医院的管理","authors":"Rebecca van der Pennen, H. Berden, E.C.A. Castelijns, W. L. Vreeman, T. Camps","doi":"10.3920/JCNS2010.X115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article we have characterised Dutch hospitals as organizational networks. They operate in a blurred context, which is the interference of principles from market and hierarchy. Based on these principles we questioned the optimal way governance can be organised. The context for governance is explained along two pathways: First, specific issues of the Dutch healthcare system and current trends in society force hospitals to react and respond in a certain way. Second, the typical organisational position of physicians in Dutch healthcare makes governance a challenge. In this context one can look at governance twofold: control or learn. We argue that each type of risk should be countered with the best applicable instrument. This means, that control or learn never can be the only convenient governance instrument. The board's choice for the proper action therefore is always ambivalent. However, the profound role of control and the neglected role of learning principles is obvious. Notwithstanding the effect...","PeriodicalId":17677,"journal":{"name":"Journal on Chain and Network Science","volume":"35 1","pages":"121-133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Governance in Dutch hospitals\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca van der Pennen, H. Berden, E.C.A. Castelijns, W. L. Vreeman, T. Camps\",\"doi\":\"10.3920/JCNS2010.X115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article we have characterised Dutch hospitals as organizational networks. They operate in a blurred context, which is the interference of principles from market and hierarchy. Based on these principles we questioned the optimal way governance can be organised. The context for governance is explained along two pathways: First, specific issues of the Dutch healthcare system and current trends in society force hospitals to react and respond in a certain way. Second, the typical organisational position of physicians in Dutch healthcare makes governance a challenge. In this context one can look at governance twofold: control or learn. We argue that each type of risk should be countered with the best applicable instrument. This means, that control or learn never can be the only convenient governance instrument. The board's choice for the proper action therefore is always ambivalent. However, the profound role of control and the neglected role of learning principles is obvious. Notwithstanding the effect...\",\"PeriodicalId\":17677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal on Chain and Network Science\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"121-133\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal on Chain and Network Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3920/JCNS2010.X115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal on Chain and Network Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3920/JCNS2010.X115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在本文中,我们将荷兰医院定性为组织网络。他们在一个模糊的背景下运作,这是来自市场和等级制度的原则的干涉。基于这些原则,我们质疑治理的最佳组织方式。治理的背景可以从两个方面解释:首先,荷兰医疗保健系统的具体问题和当前社会趋势迫使医院以某种方式作出反应和回应。其次,荷兰医疗保健中医生的典型组织地位使治理成为一项挑战。在这种情况下,可以从两个方面来看待治理:控制或学习。我们认为,每一种风险都应该用最适用的工具来应对。这意味着,控制或学习永远不可能是唯一方便的治理工具。因此,董事会对适当行动的选择总是矛盾的。然而,控制的深刻作用和被忽视的学习原则的作用是显而易见的。尽管效果……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Governance in Dutch hospitals
In this article we have characterised Dutch hospitals as organizational networks. They operate in a blurred context, which is the interference of principles from market and hierarchy. Based on these principles we questioned the optimal way governance can be organised. The context for governance is explained along two pathways: First, specific issues of the Dutch healthcare system and current trends in society force hospitals to react and respond in a certain way. Second, the typical organisational position of physicians in Dutch healthcare makes governance a challenge. In this context one can look at governance twofold: control or learn. We argue that each type of risk should be countered with the best applicable instrument. This means, that control or learn never can be the only convenient governance instrument. The board's choice for the proper action therefore is always ambivalent. However, the profound role of control and the neglected role of learning principles is obvious. Notwithstanding the effect...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The interplay of structural and relational governance in innovation alliances Organizing vegetable supply chains: results of a survey of farmers Determinants of participation and intensity of participation in collective action: evidence from smallholder avocado farmers in Kenya Stakeholder roles for fostering ambidexterity in Sub-Saharan African agricultural netchains for the emergence of multi-stakeholder cooperatives Organisation of German livestock production from the bottom up: a new institutional economic analysis of dairy cattle breeding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1