ISIC会议论文实证研究中的理论运用(1996-2020)

IF 0.7 4区 管理学 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Information Research-An International Electronic Journal Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.47989/irisic2227
A. VanScoy, Heidi E. Julien, Annette Buckley, Jon Goodell
{"title":"ISIC会议论文实证研究中的理论运用(1996-2020)","authors":"A. VanScoy, Heidi E. Julien, Annette Buckley, Jon Goodell","doi":"10.47989/irisic2227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Measuring the use of theory that informs empirical research demonstrates the rigour of research in a discipline. It also identifies key theories and connections to other disciplines. This study focuses on use of theory, broadly defined, in information behaviour. Full-length empirical papers from ISIC conference proceedings were analysed. Kumasi et al.’s (2013) theory talk framework was adapted for determining the level of theory use.Analysis. Content analysis was used to identify theories, level of theory use, and discipline of origin for theories in the papers. Most ISIC empirical papers include theory and more than half of them use theory substantially. Most theories are drawn from information science and other social sciences. Kuhlthau’s information search process is the most frequently mentioned framework. ISIC empirical papers continue to set a high standard for quality, demonstrating consistent theoretical rigour throughout the years studied. Their authors draw mainly on key information behaviour theories and models, as well as some lesser known and non-information science theories.","PeriodicalId":47431,"journal":{"name":"Information Research-An International Electronic Journal","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theory usage in empirical research in ISIC conference papers (1996-2020)\",\"authors\":\"A. VanScoy, Heidi E. Julien, Annette Buckley, Jon Goodell\",\"doi\":\"10.47989/irisic2227\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Measuring the use of theory that informs empirical research demonstrates the rigour of research in a discipline. It also identifies key theories and connections to other disciplines. This study focuses on use of theory, broadly defined, in information behaviour. Full-length empirical papers from ISIC conference proceedings were analysed. Kumasi et al.’s (2013) theory talk framework was adapted for determining the level of theory use.Analysis. Content analysis was used to identify theories, level of theory use, and discipline of origin for theories in the papers. Most ISIC empirical papers include theory and more than half of them use theory substantially. Most theories are drawn from information science and other social sciences. Kuhlthau’s information search process is the most frequently mentioned framework. ISIC empirical papers continue to set a high standard for quality, demonstrating consistent theoretical rigour throughout the years studied. Their authors draw mainly on key information behaviour theories and models, as well as some lesser known and non-information science theories.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Research-An International Electronic Journal\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Research-An International Electronic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47989/irisic2227\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Research-An International Electronic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47989/irisic2227","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

衡量理论在实证研究中的应用表明了一门学科研究的严谨性。它还确定了关键理论和与其他学科的联系。这项研究的重点是广泛定义的理论在信息行为中的应用。本文分析了ISIC会议论文集中的全文实证论文。Kumasi等人(2013)的理论谈话框架适用于确定理论使用水平。内容分析用于识别理论、理论使用水平和论文中理论的起源学科。大多数ISIC实证论文都包含理论,其中一半以上的论文大量使用理论。大多数理论来自信息科学和其他社会科学。Kuhlthau的信息搜索过程是最常被提及的框架。ISIC的实证论文继续为质量设定高标准,在研究的多年中展示了一致的理论严谨性。他们的作者主要借鉴了关键的信息行为理论和模型,以及一些鲜为人知的非信息科学理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Theory usage in empirical research in ISIC conference papers (1996-2020)
Measuring the use of theory that informs empirical research demonstrates the rigour of research in a discipline. It also identifies key theories and connections to other disciplines. This study focuses on use of theory, broadly defined, in information behaviour. Full-length empirical papers from ISIC conference proceedings were analysed. Kumasi et al.’s (2013) theory talk framework was adapted for determining the level of theory use.Analysis. Content analysis was used to identify theories, level of theory use, and discipline of origin for theories in the papers. Most ISIC empirical papers include theory and more than half of them use theory substantially. Most theories are drawn from information science and other social sciences. Kuhlthau’s information search process is the most frequently mentioned framework. ISIC empirical papers continue to set a high standard for quality, demonstrating consistent theoretical rigour throughout the years studied. Their authors draw mainly on key information behaviour theories and models, as well as some lesser known and non-information science theories.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Information Research-An International Electronic Journal
Information Research-An International Electronic Journal INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
62
审稿时长
45 weeks
期刊介绍: Information Research, is an open access, international, peer-reviewed, scholarly journal, dedicated to making accessible the results of research across a wide range of information-related disciplines. It is published by the University of Borås, Sweden, with the financial support of an NOP-HS Scientific Journal Grant. It is edited by Professor T.D. Wilson, and is hosted, and given technical support, by Lund University Libraries, Sweden.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of accessibility and usability of digital libraries in mobile platforms: blind and visually impaired users’ assessment Research on dynamic evaluation method of individual scientific impact under multiple key nodes Comparing the “value of information services” for providers and vulnerable patrons: a mixed-methods study with academic libraries and students with disabilities An inquiry-based teaching intervention to embed information literacy instructions into a library and information science curriculum in Bangladesh The informational “cosplay journey” of Star Wars cosplayers in the context of a Facebook group
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1