评估内化症状及其与受损程度的关系:基于证据的抑郁和焦虑症状量表(IDAS-II)分数临界值。

IF 1.3 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-10 DOI:10.1007/s10862-022-10008-6
A De la Rosa-Cáceres, O M Lozano, M Sanchez-Garcia, F Fernandez-Calderon, G Rossi, C Diaz-Batanero
{"title":"评估内化症状及其与受损程度的关系:基于证据的抑郁和焦虑症状量表(IDAS-II)分数临界值。","authors":"A De la Rosa-Cáceres, O M Lozano, M Sanchez-Garcia, F Fernandez-Calderon, G Rossi, C Diaz-Batanero","doi":"10.1007/s10862-022-10008-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tests and scales measuring psychological disorders should provide information about how scores relate to other constructs such as quality of life or functional impairment. Such information is necessary to allow that their scores contribute to clinical decision making. The current study analyzes the clinical utility of the Spanish version of the Inventory for Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS-II) to discriminate between different levels of functional impairment and identify the IDAS-II scales that contribute most to explaining impairment. The total sample (<i>N</i> = 1390) consists of two subsamples: a community sample of the general population (<i>n</i> = 1072) selected by random sampling; and a sample of patients (<i>n</i> = 318) from public and private mental health services. The Spanish IDAS-II for measuring internalizing symptoms and WHODAS 2.0 for measuring impairment were administered to all participants. All scales show statistically significant higher scores in the patient sample, with Cohen's <i>d</i> effect sizes values greater than 0.30, except for well-being (<i>d</i> = 0.19). The cutoff values and their confidence intervals do not overlap with the means of either the community or patient sample. AUC values for most of the scales are above .70, except for appetite gain, ordering, euphoria, cleaning, and well-being. Multiple linear regression model using IDAS-II scales explain 57.1% of the variance of the WHODAS 2.0 (<i>F</i> <sub>12.1377</sub> = 155.305; <i>p</i> < .001). Cutoff values provided allow us to reliably differentiate between the patients and community samples. Spanish IDAS-II scores show greater sensitivity and specificity in detecting those with greater impairment. General Depression, Lassitude, Panic and Claustrophobia contribute to impairment in a greater extent. Knowledge of which symptoms are most related with impairment, allows healthcare providers to improve treatment planning based on empirical evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16910,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment","volume":"45 1","pages":"170-180"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9830132/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Internalizing Symptoms and Their Relation with Levels of Impairment: Evidence-Based Cutoffs for Interpreting Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS-II) Scores.\",\"authors\":\"A De la Rosa-Cáceres, O M Lozano, M Sanchez-Garcia, F Fernandez-Calderon, G Rossi, C Diaz-Batanero\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10862-022-10008-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Tests and scales measuring psychological disorders should provide information about how scores relate to other constructs such as quality of life or functional impairment. Such information is necessary to allow that their scores contribute to clinical decision making. The current study analyzes the clinical utility of the Spanish version of the Inventory for Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS-II) to discriminate between different levels of functional impairment and identify the IDAS-II scales that contribute most to explaining impairment. The total sample (<i>N</i> = 1390) consists of two subsamples: a community sample of the general population (<i>n</i> = 1072) selected by random sampling; and a sample of patients (<i>n</i> = 318) from public and private mental health services. The Spanish IDAS-II for measuring internalizing symptoms and WHODAS 2.0 for measuring impairment were administered to all participants. All scales show statistically significant higher scores in the patient sample, with Cohen's <i>d</i> effect sizes values greater than 0.30, except for well-being (<i>d</i> = 0.19). The cutoff values and their confidence intervals do not overlap with the means of either the community or patient sample. AUC values for most of the scales are above .70, except for appetite gain, ordering, euphoria, cleaning, and well-being. Multiple linear regression model using IDAS-II scales explain 57.1% of the variance of the WHODAS 2.0 (<i>F</i> <sub>12.1377</sub> = 155.305; <i>p</i> < .001). Cutoff values provided allow us to reliably differentiate between the patients and community samples. Spanish IDAS-II scores show greater sensitivity and specificity in detecting those with greater impairment. General Depression, Lassitude, Panic and Claustrophobia contribute to impairment in a greater extent. Knowledge of which symptoms are most related with impairment, allows healthcare providers to improve treatment planning based on empirical evidence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"170-180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9830132/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-022-10008-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-022-10008-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

测量心理障碍的测验和量表应提供有关分数与生活质量或功能障碍等其他结构的关系的信息。这些信息对于帮助临床决策非常必要。本研究分析了西班牙文版抑郁和焦虑症状量表(IDAS-II)的临床实用性,以区分不同程度的功能障碍,并找出最有助于解释功能障碍的 IDAS-II 量表。总样本(N = 1390)包括两个子样本:一个是随机抽样选取的普通人群社区样本(n = 1072);另一个是来自公共和私人精神健康服务机构的患者样本(n = 318)。所有参与者都使用了用于测量内化症状的西班牙 IDAS-II 和用于测量障碍的 WHODAS 2.0。除幸福感(d = 0.19)外,所有量表在患者样本中的得分都明显高于其他量表,科恩 d 效应值均大于 0.30。临界值及其置信区间与社区或患者样本的平均值均无重叠。除食欲增加、排序、欣快、清洁和幸福感外,大多数量表的 AUC 值均高于 0.70。使用 IDAS-II 量表的多元线性回归模型解释了 WHODAS 2.0 57.1% 的方差(F 12.1377 = 155.305; p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing Internalizing Symptoms and Their Relation with Levels of Impairment: Evidence-Based Cutoffs for Interpreting Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS-II) Scores.

Tests and scales measuring psychological disorders should provide information about how scores relate to other constructs such as quality of life or functional impairment. Such information is necessary to allow that their scores contribute to clinical decision making. The current study analyzes the clinical utility of the Spanish version of the Inventory for Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS-II) to discriminate between different levels of functional impairment and identify the IDAS-II scales that contribute most to explaining impairment. The total sample (N = 1390) consists of two subsamples: a community sample of the general population (n = 1072) selected by random sampling; and a sample of patients (n = 318) from public and private mental health services. The Spanish IDAS-II for measuring internalizing symptoms and WHODAS 2.0 for measuring impairment were administered to all participants. All scales show statistically significant higher scores in the patient sample, with Cohen's d effect sizes values greater than 0.30, except for well-being (d = 0.19). The cutoff values and their confidence intervals do not overlap with the means of either the community or patient sample. AUC values for most of the scales are above .70, except for appetite gain, ordering, euphoria, cleaning, and well-being. Multiple linear regression model using IDAS-II scales explain 57.1% of the variance of the WHODAS 2.0 (F 12.1377 = 155.305; p < .001). Cutoff values provided allow us to reliably differentiate between the patients and community samples. Spanish IDAS-II scores show greater sensitivity and specificity in detecting those with greater impairment. General Depression, Lassitude, Panic and Claustrophobia contribute to impairment in a greater extent. Knowledge of which symptoms are most related with impairment, allows healthcare providers to improve treatment planning based on empirical evidence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.20%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment publishes articles reporting research investigations and clinical case summaries which enhance understanding of psychopathology and mental disorders applicable to all ages, deviant or abnormal behaviors, including those related to medical conditions and trauma, and constructs descriptive of personality. The Journal fosters scientific inquiry into assessment, description, and classification of normal and abnormal behaviors, psychobiological factors predisposing, precipitating, and maintaining psychopathology, and theories of psychopathology and behavior change. Studies of normal personality constructs and positive person attributes, person and environment factors influencing behavioral outcomes, and interactive models of cognitive, emotional, and behavior resource factors as impacting normal and abnormal behaviors are encouraged. Within Journal purview are articles focusing on therapeutic interventions, technical notes on instrumentation and assessment methodology, and reviews of recently-published books.
期刊最新文献
Validation of a Measure of Family Functioning in a Clinic-referred Sample of Children with Disruptive Behavior The Utility of the Unified Protocol in Treating Borderline Features Personality Traits Characterizing a New Type of Depression Lead to Stress Generation in Japanese University Students Comparing Conceptualizations of Narcissism in Predicting Negative Thinking Styles Concurrent and Longitudinal Predictors and Stability of Parent-Reported Sleep Problems in a Population-Based Sample at Mean Ages 8 and 15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1