信:呼吁彻底改变西班牙的研究评估

IF 2.6 4区 管理学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Profesional De La Informacion Pub Date : 2021-05-22 DOI:10.3145/EPI.2021.MAY.09
Emilio Delgado-López-Cózar, Ismael Rafols, Ernest Abadal
{"title":"信:呼吁彻底改变西班牙的研究评估","authors":"Emilio Delgado-López-Cózar, Ismael Rafols, Ernest Abadal","doi":"10.3145/EPI.2021.MAY.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This letter is a call to the Spanish scientific authorities to abandon current research evaluation policies, which are based on an excessive and indiscriminate use of bibliometric indicators for nearly all areas of scientific activity. This narrow evaluation focus is especially applied to assess the individual performance of researchers. To this end, we first describe the contexts in which the journal impact factor (JIF) and other bibliometric indicators are being used. We then consider the toxic effects of this abuse of indicators. Finally, we outline some significant transformations and initiatives being introduced in various academic fields and regions of the world. These international initiatives offer alternatives to bibliometrics that can improve evaluation processes, and we urge political leaders in Spain to adopt and develop them.","PeriodicalId":20684,"journal":{"name":"Profesional De La Informacion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Letter: A call for a radical change in research evaluation in Spain\",\"authors\":\"Emilio Delgado-López-Cózar, Ismael Rafols, Ernest Abadal\",\"doi\":\"10.3145/EPI.2021.MAY.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This letter is a call to the Spanish scientific authorities to abandon current research evaluation policies, which are based on an excessive and indiscriminate use of bibliometric indicators for nearly all areas of scientific activity. This narrow evaluation focus is especially applied to assess the individual performance of researchers. To this end, we first describe the contexts in which the journal impact factor (JIF) and other bibliometric indicators are being used. We then consider the toxic effects of this abuse of indicators. Finally, we outline some significant transformations and initiatives being introduced in various academic fields and regions of the world. These international initiatives offer alternatives to bibliometrics that can improve evaluation processes, and we urge political leaders in Spain to adopt and develop them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Profesional De La Informacion\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Profesional De La Informacion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3145/EPI.2021.MAY.09\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Profesional De La Informacion","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3145/EPI.2021.MAY.09","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

这封信是呼吁西班牙科学当局放弃目前的研究评价政策,这些政策是基于对几乎所有科学活动领域过度和不加区分地使用文献计量指标。这种狭隘的评估重点特别适用于评估研究人员的个人表现。为此,我们首先描述了使用期刊影响因子(JIF)和其他文献计量指标的背景。然后,我们考虑这种滥用指标的不良影响。最后,我们概述了在世界各个学术领域和地区正在引入的一些重大变革和倡议。这些国际倡议提供了替代文献计量学的方法,可以改善评估过程,我们敦促西班牙的政治领导人采用和发展它们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Letter: A call for a radical change in research evaluation in Spain
This letter is a call to the Spanish scientific authorities to abandon current research evaluation policies, which are based on an excessive and indiscriminate use of bibliometric indicators for nearly all areas of scientific activity. This narrow evaluation focus is especially applied to assess the individual performance of researchers. To this end, we first describe the contexts in which the journal impact factor (JIF) and other bibliometric indicators are being used. We then consider the toxic effects of this abuse of indicators. Finally, we outline some significant transformations and initiatives being introduced in various academic fields and regions of the world. These international initiatives offer alternatives to bibliometrics that can improve evaluation processes, and we urge political leaders in Spain to adopt and develop them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
9.50%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: El profesional de la información es una revista sobre información, bibliotecas y nuevas tecnologías de la información. Primera revista española de Biblioteconomía y Documentación indexada por las dos bases de datos bibliográficas internacionales más importantes: ISI Social Science Citation Index y Scopus
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of online education among 16-18-year-olds: Differences and similarities in their interests and preferred formats according to where they live Informal learning of Spanish in a Chinese music fan community Social responsibility of Spanish universities for sustainable relationships Political polarization and politainment: Methodology for analyzing crypto hate speech on TikTok Political polarization and emotion rhetoric in the US presidential transition: A comparative study of Trump and Biden on Twitter and the post-election impact on the public
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1