IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY HYBRIS Revista de Filosofia Pub Date : 2020-06-30 DOI:10.18778/1689-4286.49.02
K. Kociołek, Robert Sonek
{"title":"Względna identyczność Petera Geacha a koncepcja różnicy w filozofii Gilles’a Deleuze’a","authors":"K. Kociołek, Robert Sonek","doi":"10.18778/1689-4286.49.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The area in which the philosophy attributed to the \"analytic\" tradition turns out to consider similar problems as the \"continental\" thinkers still seems to be too little explored. The aim of the work is to indicate such similarities between the Peter Geach ’s concept of relative identity and the Gilles Deleuze’s concept of difference. According to Geach, identity is mediated in concepts. We think about the identity of \"a\" and \"b\" only in the sentence \"a is the same X as b\". The consequences of this observation are twofold: on the one hand, it shows the degree of our entanglement in conceptual grids; on the other, it shows a being as a dynamic, relational structure. In We are going to present the ontological view on identity question which synthesizes two mentioned conceptions and include a polemical characterization of difficulties implied by discussed perspective and their consequences for practical functioning in the world.","PeriodicalId":30478,"journal":{"name":"HYBRIS Revista de Filosofia","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HYBRIS Revista de Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/1689-4286.49.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

归属于“分析”传统的哲学考虑与“大陆”思想家类似的问题,这一领域似乎仍然很少被探索。本文的目的是指出彼得·吉奇的相对同一性概念与吉尔·德勒兹的差异概念之间的相似性。根据Geach的观点,同一性是以概念为中介的。我们只在“a和b是同一个X”这个句子中考虑“a”和“b”的同一性。这种观察的结果是双重的:一方面,它显示了我们在概念网格中的纠缠程度;另一方面,它显示了一个动态的关系结构。在本文中,我们将提出关于身份问题的本体论观点,该观点综合了上述两个概念,并对所讨论的观点所隐含的困难及其对世界实际功能的影响进行了辩论性的描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Względna identyczność Petera Geacha a koncepcja różnicy w filozofii Gilles’a Deleuze’a
The area in which the philosophy attributed to the "analytic" tradition turns out to consider similar problems as the "continental" thinkers still seems to be too little explored. The aim of the work is to indicate such similarities between the Peter Geach ’s concept of relative identity and the Gilles Deleuze’s concept of difference. According to Geach, identity is mediated in concepts. We think about the identity of "a" and "b" only in the sentence "a is the same X as b". The consequences of this observation are twofold: on the one hand, it shows the degree of our entanglement in conceptual grids; on the other, it shows a being as a dynamic, relational structure. In We are going to present the ontological view on identity question which synthesizes two mentioned conceptions and include a polemical characterization of difficulties implied by discussed perspective and their consequences for practical functioning in the world.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Teologiczne konsekwencje darwinizmu — „Bóg Darwina” Corneliusa G. Huntera Co to za świat? The Limits of Liberalism. Tradition, Individualism, and the crisis of freedom, Mark. T. Mitchell, University of Notre Dame Press, Indiana 2019, ss. 328 – Artykuł Recenzyjny Teoria interpretacji Paula Ricoeura i Hansa-Georga Gadamera. Analiza porównawcza Ideologia w edukacji. Spojrzenie opisowe, negatywne i pozytywne na przykładzie wybranych stanowisk pedagogiki katolickiej i krytycznej
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1