儿童发展在土耳其与监护有关的评估中的地位

Q3 Social Sciences Social Work and Social Sciences Review Pub Date : 2021-03-31 DOI:10.1921/swssr.v22i2.1347
S. Aydos, Aysel Köksal Akyol
{"title":"儿童发展在土耳其与监护有关的评估中的地位","authors":"S. Aydos, Aysel Köksal Akyol","doi":"10.1921/swssr.v22i2.1347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to examine the reports prepared in the process of deciding the custody of children in divorced families in the context of child development. The reports evaluated in the scope of the research were evaluated by the method of document review and the results were found in the context of child development and the best interest of the child.  In this context, a total of 107 reports related to custody were examined. The results from findings show that while evaluations regarding custody are expressed in many places with the emphasis on the development of the children, the reports contain little information about the development of the child. When the child's best interest is considered to be the most important component of child development, it is seen that as a result of these depictions, developing a new system in order to protect the best interest of the child, which is one of the top principles of the law related to custody, and carrying out an evaluation that focuses on child development is necessary.","PeriodicalId":53681,"journal":{"name":"Social Work and Social Sciences Review","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The place of child development in evaluations related to custody in Turkey\",\"authors\":\"S. Aydos, Aysel Köksal Akyol\",\"doi\":\"10.1921/swssr.v22i2.1347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study is to examine the reports prepared in the process of deciding the custody of children in divorced families in the context of child development. The reports evaluated in the scope of the research were evaluated by the method of document review and the results were found in the context of child development and the best interest of the child.  In this context, a total of 107 reports related to custody were examined. The results from findings show that while evaluations regarding custody are expressed in many places with the emphasis on the development of the children, the reports contain little information about the development of the child. When the child's best interest is considered to be the most important component of child development, it is seen that as a result of these depictions, developing a new system in order to protect the best interest of the child, which is one of the top principles of the law related to custody, and carrying out an evaluation that focuses on child development is necessary.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Work and Social Sciences Review\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Work and Social Sciences Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v22i2.1347\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Work and Social Sciences Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v22i2.1347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是审查在儿童发展的背景下决定离婚家庭子女监护权的过程中编写的报告。在研究范围内评估的报告通过文件审查的方法进行评估,结果是在儿童发展和儿童最大利益的背景下发现的。在这方面,共审查了107份与拘留有关的报告。调查结果表明,虽然许多地方对监护权的评价都强调儿童的发展,但报告中几乎没有关于儿童发展的信息。当儿童的最大利益被认为是儿童发展中最重要的组成部分时,可以看到,由于这些描述,为了保护儿童的最大利益而制定一种新的制度,这是监护权相关法律的首要原则之一,并开展以儿童发展为重点的评估是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The place of child development in evaluations related to custody in Turkey
The aim of this study is to examine the reports prepared in the process of deciding the custody of children in divorced families in the context of child development. The reports evaluated in the scope of the research were evaluated by the method of document review and the results were found in the context of child development and the best interest of the child.  In this context, a total of 107 reports related to custody were examined. The results from findings show that while evaluations regarding custody are expressed in many places with the emphasis on the development of the children, the reports contain little information about the development of the child. When the child's best interest is considered to be the most important component of child development, it is seen that as a result of these depictions, developing a new system in order to protect the best interest of the child, which is one of the top principles of the law related to custody, and carrying out an evaluation that focuses on child development is necessary.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Work and Social Sciences Review
Social Work and Social Sciences Review Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Web-based mindfulness course for staff working in care homes in Wales for older people with dementia social inclusion of mental health service users in Brazil: Applying SCOPE-B scale Quality of life as a basis for system change Editorial: Celebrating the work of Peter Huxley Historical applications of the Goldberg and Huxley Pathway to Psychiatric Care Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1