“征服查科唯一可能的制度是人口。”查科总督、边境指挥官及其对查科领土的看法(1872-1884)

Daniel Chao
{"title":"“征服查科唯一可能的制度是人口。”查科总督、边境指挥官及其对查科领土的看法(1872-1884)","authors":"Daniel Chao","doi":"10.46553/rges.57.2021.p.81-111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I analyze and compare the statement memories presented by the governors of the Chaco and the commanders of the North of the Interior (or North of Santa Fe) and Salta boundaries to the ministries of the Interior and War and Navy, respectively, during the period 1872-1884. The aim is to address the ways in which these authorities legitimized by the State thought about the problems of the territory and the population, and presented possible ways of solving them. The comparison is made from describing the moral and ethical justifications emerging in the words of these authorities (what we will call 'rationalities'), and the procedures, techniques and calculations elaborated as solutions to the problems described (what we will call 'technologies'). I intend to contribute with this analysis to the study of the political-military process deployed in the region after the War of the Triple Alliance, at the same time to give an account of the ways in which they tried to establish a government territory.","PeriodicalId":33746,"journal":{"name":"Res Gesta","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"El único sistema posible para la conquista del Chaco es la población”. Gobernadores del Chaco, comandantes de frontera, y su pensamiento sobre el territorio chaqueño (1872-1884)\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Chao\",\"doi\":\"10.46553/rges.57.2021.p.81-111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I analyze and compare the statement memories presented by the governors of the Chaco and the commanders of the North of the Interior (or North of Santa Fe) and Salta boundaries to the ministries of the Interior and War and Navy, respectively, during the period 1872-1884. The aim is to address the ways in which these authorities legitimized by the State thought about the problems of the territory and the population, and presented possible ways of solving them. The comparison is made from describing the moral and ethical justifications emerging in the words of these authorities (what we will call 'rationalities'), and the procedures, techniques and calculations elaborated as solutions to the problems described (what we will call 'technologies'). I intend to contribute with this analysis to the study of the political-military process deployed in the region after the War of the Triple Alliance, at the same time to give an account of the ways in which they tried to establish a government territory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Res Gesta\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Res Gesta\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46553/rges.57.2021.p.81-111\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Res Gesta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46553/rges.57.2021.p.81-111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我分析并比较了1872-1884年间查科总督和北部内陆(或北部圣达菲)和萨尔塔边界的指挥官分别向内政部和陆军部提交的陈述记忆。其目的是讨论这些当局是如何被国家合法化的,如何思考领土和人口的问题,并提出解决这些问题的可能方法。比较是通过描述这些权威话语中出现的道德和伦理理由(我们称之为“理性”)和作为所描述问题的解决方案而阐述的程序、技术和计算(我们称之为“技术”)来进行的。我打算用这一分析对三国同盟战争后该地区部署的政治-军事进程的研究作出贡献,同时说明他们试图建立政府领土的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"El único sistema posible para la conquista del Chaco es la población”. Gobernadores del Chaco, comandantes de frontera, y su pensamiento sobre el territorio chaqueño (1872-1884)
I analyze and compare the statement memories presented by the governors of the Chaco and the commanders of the North of the Interior (or North of Santa Fe) and Salta boundaries to the ministries of the Interior and War and Navy, respectively, during the period 1872-1884. The aim is to address the ways in which these authorities legitimized by the State thought about the problems of the territory and the population, and presented possible ways of solving them. The comparison is made from describing the moral and ethical justifications emerging in the words of these authorities (what we will call 'rationalities'), and the procedures, techniques and calculations elaborated as solutions to the problems described (what we will call 'technologies'). I intend to contribute with this analysis to the study of the political-military process deployed in the region after the War of the Triple Alliance, at the same time to give an account of the ways in which they tried to establish a government territory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prensa del litoral y surgimiento de El Porvenir de Entre Ríos, que “no es un diario oficial del Gobierno” de Justo José de Urquiza, hacia 1850 “Enseñar a leer” a los colonos de la pampa gringa: el periódico y la formación de lectores modernos Las autobiografías de historiadores, entre la literatura y el testimonio autobiográfico Ciencia, reforma y universidad: la “cultura científica” y la educación superior en la Revista Argentina de Ciencias Políticas Albores del 800 en el vergel cuyano (Algunos aportes desde la literatura y la historia regional)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1