不同类型有机肥对大头草、狗尾草和紫荆草产量的影响

M. Sahlan, I. W. Suarna, N. Roni
{"title":"不同类型有机肥对大头草、狗尾草和紫荆草产量的影响","authors":"M. Sahlan, I. W. Suarna, N. Roni","doi":"10.24843/pastura.2018.v08.i01.p04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Forage is the main feed that contains almost all the nutrients needed by ruminants. This study aimed to determine the productivity of Panicum maximum, Setaria splendida Stapf, and Pennisetum purpureum grass were given organic fertilizer and knew the best organic fertilizer for each type of grass. The study used a completely randomized design in split plot pattern. The first factor (main plot) consists of three types of grass; Panicum maximum, Setaria splendida, and Pennisetum purpureum. The second factor (sub plot / subplot) is a type of organic fertilizer; without fertilizer, manure, compost, and vermicompost. Each treatment was repeated three times so that it consisted of 36 experimental units. The results showed that the interaction between the treatment of the type of organic fertilizer with the type of grass occurred in the variable number of tillers and the dry weight of the stem. The types of compost in significant can increase the number of tillers, the number of leaves, the dry weight of the stems, the dry weight of the leaves, and the total dry weight of forage, compared to without fertilizer. The type of grass has a significant effect on all observed variables. Based on the results of the study it can be concluded that the interaction between the treatment of the type of organic fertilizer with the type of grass affects the number of tillers and the dry weight of the stem, the three types of grass have different productivity, while among the organic fertilizers provided, compost gives the best results. \nKeywords: grass, manure, compost, vermicompost","PeriodicalId":53328,"journal":{"name":"Pastura Journal of Tropical Forage Science","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EFFECT OF VARIOUS TYPES OF ORGANIC FERTILIZER ON PRODUCTIVITY OF Panicum maximum, Setaria splendida, AND Pennisetum purpureum GRASS\",\"authors\":\"M. Sahlan, I. W. Suarna, N. Roni\",\"doi\":\"10.24843/pastura.2018.v08.i01.p04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Forage is the main feed that contains almost all the nutrients needed by ruminants. This study aimed to determine the productivity of Panicum maximum, Setaria splendida Stapf, and Pennisetum purpureum grass were given organic fertilizer and knew the best organic fertilizer for each type of grass. The study used a completely randomized design in split plot pattern. The first factor (main plot) consists of three types of grass; Panicum maximum, Setaria splendida, and Pennisetum purpureum. The second factor (sub plot / subplot) is a type of organic fertilizer; without fertilizer, manure, compost, and vermicompost. Each treatment was repeated three times so that it consisted of 36 experimental units. The results showed that the interaction between the treatment of the type of organic fertilizer with the type of grass occurred in the variable number of tillers and the dry weight of the stem. The types of compost in significant can increase the number of tillers, the number of leaves, the dry weight of the stems, the dry weight of the leaves, and the total dry weight of forage, compared to without fertilizer. The type of grass has a significant effect on all observed variables. Based on the results of the study it can be concluded that the interaction between the treatment of the type of organic fertilizer with the type of grass affects the number of tillers and the dry weight of the stem, the three types of grass have different productivity, while among the organic fertilizers provided, compost gives the best results. \\nKeywords: grass, manure, compost, vermicompost\",\"PeriodicalId\":53328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pastura Journal of Tropical Forage Science\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pastura Journal of Tropical Forage Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24843/pastura.2018.v08.i01.p04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pastura Journal of Tropical Forage Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24843/pastura.2018.v08.i01.p04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

牧草是反刍动物的主要饲料,它几乎包含了反刍动物所需的所有营养物质。本研究旨在确定在施用有机肥的条件下,大头草(Panicum maximum)、秋草(Setaria splendida Stapf)和紫荆草(Pennisetum purpureum)的产量,并确定每种草的最佳有机肥用量。本研究采用完全随机分割图设计。第一个因子(主地块)由三种类型的草组成;大茴香,狗尾草,狼尾草。第二个因素(subplot / subplot)是一种有机肥;没有肥料、粪肥、堆肥和蚯蚓堆肥。每个处理重复三次,共36个实验单元。结果表明,有机肥类型处理与牧草类型的交互作用表现在分蘖数和茎干重的变化上。与不施肥相比,堆肥类型显著增加分蘖数、叶片数、茎干重、叶片干重和牧草总干重。草的类型对所有观测变量都有显著影响。研究结果表明,有机肥类型与牧草类型的交互作用影响分蘖数和茎干重,三种牧草的生产力不同,而有机肥中堆肥的效果最好。关键词:草,粪肥,堆肥,蚯蚓堆肥
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EFFECT OF VARIOUS TYPES OF ORGANIC FERTILIZER ON PRODUCTIVITY OF Panicum maximum, Setaria splendida, AND Pennisetum purpureum GRASS
Forage is the main feed that contains almost all the nutrients needed by ruminants. This study aimed to determine the productivity of Panicum maximum, Setaria splendida Stapf, and Pennisetum purpureum grass were given organic fertilizer and knew the best organic fertilizer for each type of grass. The study used a completely randomized design in split plot pattern. The first factor (main plot) consists of three types of grass; Panicum maximum, Setaria splendida, and Pennisetum purpureum. The second factor (sub plot / subplot) is a type of organic fertilizer; without fertilizer, manure, compost, and vermicompost. Each treatment was repeated three times so that it consisted of 36 experimental units. The results showed that the interaction between the treatment of the type of organic fertilizer with the type of grass occurred in the variable number of tillers and the dry weight of the stem. The types of compost in significant can increase the number of tillers, the number of leaves, the dry weight of the stems, the dry weight of the leaves, and the total dry weight of forage, compared to without fertilizer. The type of grass has a significant effect on all observed variables. Based on the results of the study it can be concluded that the interaction between the treatment of the type of organic fertilizer with the type of grass affects the number of tillers and the dry weight of the stem, the three types of grass have different productivity, while among the organic fertilizers provided, compost gives the best results. Keywords: grass, manure, compost, vermicompost
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pertumbuhan Kembali dan Hasil Asystasia gangetica Subsp. Micrantha yang Diberi Pupuk Organik Limbah Padat Virgin Coconut Oil dengan Dosis dan Waktu Dekomposisi Berbeda Kecernaan Bahan Kering dan Bahan Organik Rumput Meksiko (Euchlaena mexicana) pada Berbagai Umur Potong dan Dosis Pupuk Pertumbuhan dan Biomasa Segar Rumput Odot (Pennisetum purpureum cv. Mott) pada Lahan Gambut dengan Pemberian Pupuk Urin Kelinci Fermentasi Analisis Konsentrasi serta Kemurnian DNA Hasil Ekstraksi Rumput Raja (Pennisetum purpuroides) dan Rumput Gajah (Pennisetum purpureum) Menggunakan Metode CTAB dan DNAzol Nisbah Kesetaraan Lahan Tumpangsari Indigofera zollingeriana - Brachiaria humidicola Berdasarkan Produksi Daun-Batang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1