个人选择比集体选择更合理。书评:V. Radaev《危机中的教学》

IF 0.7 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Voprosy Obrazovaniya-Educational Studies Moscow Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.17323/1814-9545-2022-3-250-262
D. Rogozin
{"title":"个人选择比集体选择更合理。书评:V. Radaev《危机中的教学》","authors":"D. Rogozin","doi":"10.17323/1814-9545-2022-3-250-262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The book by Vadim Radaev is a symbiosis of autobiographical writing and analytical processing of personal observations, statistics and sociological data, teachers’ statements and students’ claims about the learning process in higher education. In the first part of the book, Radaev detects a deep crisis in teaching, which is firstly caused by a new anthropological type of student with different ideas, views, demands (millennials and zoomers, without any significant experience in living in the USSR). Higher education has been gradually sinking into a crisis over the past decades (the undermining of narrative culture, the rejection of accumulation of cultural background, new requirements for the educational product packaging, the erosion of motivation, the distraction of attention, etc.), so the pandemic, isolation, forced distance learning formats have only accelerated this process. In the second part, Radaev proposes a program for overcoming the crisis, which is based on professional standards, personal pedagogical techniques, and the ethical position of a teacher, as distinguished to strongly worded prescriptions and instructions. A way out of the crisis is possible only when the personal position of the teacher is added to his or her awareness of the crisis, when the teacher reflects the meaning of his or her working activity. Radaev’s book raises many issues, leaves them open, pushes the reader for contemplations, denials, and discussion.","PeriodicalId":54119,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Obrazovaniya-Educational Studies Moscow","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Personal Choice Is More Reasonable than Collective. Review of the book: V. Radaev «Teaching in Crisis»\",\"authors\":\"D. Rogozin\",\"doi\":\"10.17323/1814-9545-2022-3-250-262\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The book by Vadim Radaev is a symbiosis of autobiographical writing and analytical processing of personal observations, statistics and sociological data, teachers’ statements and students’ claims about the learning process in higher education. In the first part of the book, Radaev detects a deep crisis in teaching, which is firstly caused by a new anthropological type of student with different ideas, views, demands (millennials and zoomers, without any significant experience in living in the USSR). Higher education has been gradually sinking into a crisis over the past decades (the undermining of narrative culture, the rejection of accumulation of cultural background, new requirements for the educational product packaging, the erosion of motivation, the distraction of attention, etc.), so the pandemic, isolation, forced distance learning formats have only accelerated this process. In the second part, Radaev proposes a program for overcoming the crisis, which is based on professional standards, personal pedagogical techniques, and the ethical position of a teacher, as distinguished to strongly worded prescriptions and instructions. A way out of the crisis is possible only when the personal position of the teacher is added to his or her awareness of the crisis, when the teacher reflects the meaning of his or her working activity. Radaev’s book raises many issues, leaves them open, pushes the reader for contemplations, denials, and discussion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Voprosy Obrazovaniya-Educational Studies Moscow\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Voprosy Obrazovaniya-Educational Studies Moscow\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2022-3-250-262\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy Obrazovaniya-Educational Studies Moscow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2022-3-250-262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

瓦迪姆·拉达耶夫(Vadim Radaev)的这本书结合了自传体写作和个人观察、统计和社会学数据、教师陈述和学生对高等教育学习过程的要求的分析处理。在书的第一部分,Radaev发现了教学中的深刻危机,这首先是由具有不同思想,观点和要求的新人类学类型的学生(千禧一代和放大一代,没有任何在苏联生活的重要经验)引起的。在过去的几十年里,高等教育逐渐陷入危机(叙事文化的破坏,文化背景积累的拒绝,对教育产品包装的新要求,动力的侵蚀,注意力的分散等),因此流行病,隔离,强制远程学习形式只会加速这一进程。在第二部分中,Radaev提出了一个克服危机的方案,该方案基于专业标准、个人教学技术和教师的道德立场,而不是措辞强硬的处方和指示。只有当教师的个人立场增加到他或她对危机的认识时,当教师反映他或她的工作活动的意义时,走出危机的方法才有可能。Radaev的书提出了许多问题,让它们开放,促使读者思考、否认和讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Personal Choice Is More Reasonable than Collective. Review of the book: V. Radaev «Teaching in Crisis»
The book by Vadim Radaev is a symbiosis of autobiographical writing and analytical processing of personal observations, statistics and sociological data, teachers’ statements and students’ claims about the learning process in higher education. In the first part of the book, Radaev detects a deep crisis in teaching, which is firstly caused by a new anthropological type of student with different ideas, views, demands (millennials and zoomers, without any significant experience in living in the USSR). Higher education has been gradually sinking into a crisis over the past decades (the undermining of narrative culture, the rejection of accumulation of cultural background, new requirements for the educational product packaging, the erosion of motivation, the distraction of attention, etc.), so the pandemic, isolation, forced distance learning formats have only accelerated this process. In the second part, Radaev proposes a program for overcoming the crisis, which is based on professional standards, personal pedagogical techniques, and the ethical position of a teacher, as distinguished to strongly worded prescriptions and instructions. A way out of the crisis is possible only when the personal position of the teacher is added to his or her awareness of the crisis, when the teacher reflects the meaning of his or her working activity. Radaev’s book raises many issues, leaves them open, pushes the reader for contemplations, denials, and discussion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Voprosy Obrazovaniya-Educational Studies Moscow
Voprosy Obrazovaniya-Educational Studies Moscow EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
42.90%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Power of Probability in Psychometrics. Review of the book “Bayesian Psychometric Modeling“ The Role of Context in Scenario-Based Tasks for Measuring Universal Skills: The Use of Generalizability Theory Experience of Using Bifactor Models to Reduce the Effects of Social Desirability on the Normative Questionnaire of Universal Competencies Psychometric Research: Modern Methods and New Opportunities for Education Psychometrics and Cognitive Research: Contradictions and Possibility for Cooperation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1