编码失真下光场数据主观质量评价

E. Palma, F. Battisti, M. Carli, P. Astola, I. Tabus
{"title":"编码失真下光场数据主观质量评价","authors":"E. Palma, F. Battisti, M. Carli, P. Astola, I. Tabus","doi":"10.23919/Eusipco47968.2020.9287564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This contribution presents the subjective evaluation of the compressed light field datasets obtained with four state-of- the-art codecs: two from the JPEG Pleno Light Field Verification Model and two recent methods for which codecs are publicly available. To the best of our knowledge, currently no subjective testing has been carried out to compare the performances of the four considered codecs. The evaluation methodology is based on Bradley-Terry scores, obtained from pairwise comparisons of the four codecs at four target bit-rates, for four light field datasets. The subset of pairs for which the comparisons are performed is selected according to the square design method, under two design variants, resulting in two datasets of subjective results. The analysis of the collected data, obtained by ranking the subjective scores of the codecs at various bitrates, shows high correlation with the available objective quality metrics.","PeriodicalId":6705,"journal":{"name":"2020 28th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO)","volume":"29 1","pages":"526-530"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subjective Quality Evaluation of Light Field Data Under Coding Distortions\",\"authors\":\"E. Palma, F. Battisti, M. Carli, P. Astola, I. Tabus\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/Eusipco47968.2020.9287564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This contribution presents the subjective evaluation of the compressed light field datasets obtained with four state-of- the-art codecs: two from the JPEG Pleno Light Field Verification Model and two recent methods for which codecs are publicly available. To the best of our knowledge, currently no subjective testing has been carried out to compare the performances of the four considered codecs. The evaluation methodology is based on Bradley-Terry scores, obtained from pairwise comparisons of the four codecs at four target bit-rates, for four light field datasets. The subset of pairs for which the comparisons are performed is selected according to the square design method, under two design variants, resulting in two datasets of subjective results. The analysis of the collected data, obtained by ranking the subjective scores of the codecs at various bitrates, shows high correlation with the available objective quality metrics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 28th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO)\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"526-530\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 28th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/Eusipco47968.2020.9287564\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 28th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/Eusipco47968.2020.9287564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这篇文章介绍了用四种最先进的编解码器获得的压缩光场数据集的主观评估:两种来自JPEG Pleno光场验证模型,两种最新的编解码器方法是公开可用的。据我们所知,目前还没有进行主观测试来比较这四种编解码器的性能。评估方法基于布拉德利-特里分数,该分数是通过对四种编解码器在四种目标比特率下的四种光场数据集的两两比较获得的。在两个设计变量下,根据平方设计方法选择进行比较的配对子集,从而产生两个主观结果的数据集。通过对编解码器在不同比特率下的主观得分进行排名,对收集到的数据进行分析,显示出与可用的客观质量指标高度相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Subjective Quality Evaluation of Light Field Data Under Coding Distortions
This contribution presents the subjective evaluation of the compressed light field datasets obtained with four state-of- the-art codecs: two from the JPEG Pleno Light Field Verification Model and two recent methods for which codecs are publicly available. To the best of our knowledge, currently no subjective testing has been carried out to compare the performances of the four considered codecs. The evaluation methodology is based on Bradley-Terry scores, obtained from pairwise comparisons of the four codecs at four target bit-rates, for four light field datasets. The subset of pairs for which the comparisons are performed is selected according to the square design method, under two design variants, resulting in two datasets of subjective results. The analysis of the collected data, obtained by ranking the subjective scores of the codecs at various bitrates, shows high correlation with the available objective quality metrics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Eusipco 2021 Cover Page A graph-theoretic sensor-selection scheme for covariance-based Motor Imagery (MI) decoding Hidden Markov Model Based Data-driven Calibration of Non-dispersive Infrared Gas Sensor Deep Transform Learning for Multi-Sensor Fusion Two Stages Parallel LMS Structure: A Pipelined Hardware Architecture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1