剖宫产术中疼痛处理的使用及费用

C. B. Tashtanbekova, E. A. Chuenkova, A. Evstratov, L. Ziganshina
{"title":"剖宫产术中疼痛处理的使用及费用","authors":"C. B. Tashtanbekova, E. A. Chuenkova, A. Evstratov, L. Ziganshina","doi":"10.17816/kmj2020-418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim.  To study the use of drugs for pain management for cesarean section and their cost on time and the first day after surgery. Methods.  A retrospective analysis of 117 anesthesia cards and childbirth histories of women after a cesarean section was performed. We analyzed drug therapy aimed at reducing pain during 1 day after cesarean section and performed a comparative analysis of the cost of drugs used in spinal and epidural anesthesia. Results.  Regional methods of anesthesia, epidural and spinal, were used in 95% of all cases. Spinal anesthesia was performed in 77 women, epidural — in 34 women. The frequency of prescribing opioid analgesics was higher with spinal anesthesia compared with epidural: trimeperidine (intramuscular) was used in 62 (83%) of 77 patients for spinal anesthesia and 1 (3%) of 34 for epidural anesthesia (p <0.05). There were no differences in the use of ketoprofen in the postoperative period with epidural and spinal anesthesia. The total cost of medicines used to control pain during and on the 1st day after surgery, with epidural anesthesia, was almost 10 times higher than that of spinal anesthesia: 938 and 98 rubles, respectively. Conclusion.  To control pain during cesarean section, in addition to local anesthetics, trimeperidine was used more often with spinal than epidural anesthesia; in the postoperative period, ketoprofen and trimeperidine were used with the equal frequency with greater use of ropivacaine with epidural anesthesia through a stored catheter; this has caused a higher cost of pain management during and in the first day after cesarean section with epidural anesthesia.","PeriodicalId":17798,"journal":{"name":"Kazanskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use and costs of pain management in cesarian section\",\"authors\":\"C. B. Tashtanbekova, E. A. Chuenkova, A. Evstratov, L. Ziganshina\",\"doi\":\"10.17816/kmj2020-418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim.  To study the use of drugs for pain management for cesarean section and their cost on time and the first day after surgery. Methods.  A retrospective analysis of 117 anesthesia cards and childbirth histories of women after a cesarean section was performed. We analyzed drug therapy aimed at reducing pain during 1 day after cesarean section and performed a comparative analysis of the cost of drugs used in spinal and epidural anesthesia. Results.  Regional methods of anesthesia, epidural and spinal, were used in 95% of all cases. Spinal anesthesia was performed in 77 women, epidural — in 34 women. The frequency of prescribing opioid analgesics was higher with spinal anesthesia compared with epidural: trimeperidine (intramuscular) was used in 62 (83%) of 77 patients for spinal anesthesia and 1 (3%) of 34 for epidural anesthesia (p <0.05). There were no differences in the use of ketoprofen in the postoperative period with epidural and spinal anesthesia. The total cost of medicines used to control pain during and on the 1st day after surgery, with epidural anesthesia, was almost 10 times higher than that of spinal anesthesia: 938 and 98 rubles, respectively. Conclusion.  To control pain during cesarean section, in addition to local anesthetics, trimeperidine was used more often with spinal than epidural anesthesia; in the postoperative period, ketoprofen and trimeperidine were used with the equal frequency with greater use of ropivacaine with epidural anesthesia through a stored catheter; this has caused a higher cost of pain management during and in the first day after cesarean section with epidural anesthesia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kazanskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kazanskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17816/kmj2020-418\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kazanskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/kmj2020-418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

的目标。目的:探讨剖宫产术中疼痛管理药物的使用情况及其在手术当日和术后第一天的费用。方法。回顾性分析117例剖宫产术后产妇的麻醉卡及分娩史。我们分析了剖宫产术后1天内旨在减轻疼痛的药物治疗,并对脊髓和硬膜外麻醉所用药物的成本进行了比较分析。结果。95%的病例采用局部麻醉,硬膜外麻醉和脊髓麻醉。脊髓麻醉77例,硬膜外麻醉34例。腰麻组使用阿片类镇痛药的频率高于硬膜外麻醉组:77例腰麻组中62例(83%)使用肌内注射曲美培啶,34例硬膜外麻醉组中1例(3%)使用肌内注射曲美培啶(p <0.05)。在硬膜外麻醉和脊髓麻醉下,术后使用酮洛芬的情况没有差异。硬膜外麻醉在手术期间和术后第1天用于控制疼痛的药物总费用几乎是脊髓麻醉的10倍:分别为938卢布和98卢布。结论。为了控制剖宫产术中的疼痛,除了局麻药外,曲美培啶与脊髓麻醉比硬膜外麻醉更常被使用;术后,酮洛芬和曲美培啶的使用频率相同,更多地使用罗哌卡因硬膜外麻醉,通过储存导管麻醉;这导致剖宫产术期间和术后第一天的硬膜外麻醉疼痛管理费用较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Use and costs of pain management in cesarian section
Aim.  To study the use of drugs for pain management for cesarean section and their cost on time and the first day after surgery. Methods.  A retrospective analysis of 117 anesthesia cards and childbirth histories of women after a cesarean section was performed. We analyzed drug therapy aimed at reducing pain during 1 day after cesarean section and performed a comparative analysis of the cost of drugs used in spinal and epidural anesthesia. Results.  Regional methods of anesthesia, epidural and spinal, were used in 95% of all cases. Spinal anesthesia was performed in 77 women, epidural — in 34 women. The frequency of prescribing opioid analgesics was higher with spinal anesthesia compared with epidural: trimeperidine (intramuscular) was used in 62 (83%) of 77 patients for spinal anesthesia and 1 (3%) of 34 for epidural anesthesia (p <0.05). There were no differences in the use of ketoprofen in the postoperative period with epidural and spinal anesthesia. The total cost of medicines used to control pain during and on the 1st day after surgery, with epidural anesthesia, was almost 10 times higher than that of spinal anesthesia: 938 and 98 rubles, respectively. Conclusion.  To control pain during cesarean section, in addition to local anesthetics, trimeperidine was used more often with spinal than epidural anesthesia; in the postoperative period, ketoprofen and trimeperidine were used with the equal frequency with greater use of ropivacaine with epidural anesthesia through a stored catheter; this has caused a higher cost of pain management during and in the first day after cesarean section with epidural anesthesia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Heart damage in patients with cirrhosis of the liver Comprehensive assessment of certain trace elements, hormones and enzymes in patients with exogenous-constitutional obesity in predicting transition to metabolic syndrome Inclusion of the prepared patient relatives in the process of early rehabilitation of onco-surgical patients in the department of anesthesiology and intensive care The role of transanal drainage tube in low anterior resection for rectal cancer The role of Kazan therapists in the development of the direction of Botkin's scientific research and clinical practice in the first half of the twentieth century
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1