心电图成像中分割变异性影响的不确定性量化。

Paemi Sino Pub Date : 2021-06-01 Epub Date: 2021-06-18 DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-78710-3_49
Jess D Tate, Wilson Good, Nejib Zemzemi, Machteld Boonstra, Peter van Dam, Dana H Brooks, Akil Narayan, Rob S MacLeod
{"title":"心电图成像中分割变异性影响的不确定性量化。","authors":"Jess D Tate, Wilson Good, Nejib Zemzemi, Machteld Boonstra, Peter van Dam, Dana H Brooks, Akil Narayan, Rob S MacLeod","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-78710-3_49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite advances in many of the techniques used in Electrocardiographic Imaging (ECGI), uncertainty remains insufficiently quantified for many aspects of the pipeline. The effect of geometric uncertainty, particularly due to segmentation variability, may be the least explored to date. We use statistical shape modeling and uncertainty quantification (UQ) to compute the effect of segmentation variability on ECGI solutions. The shape model was made with Shapeworks from nine segmentations of the same patient and incorporated into an ECGI pipeline. We computed uncertainty of the pericardial potentials and local activation times (LATs) using polynomial chaos expansion (PCE) implemented in UncertainSCI. Uncertainty in pericardial potentials from segmentation variation mirrored areas of high variability in the shape model, near the base of the heart and the right ventricular outflow tract, and that ECGI was less sensitive to uncertainty in the posterior region of the heart. Subsequently LAT calculations could vary dramatically due to segmentation variability, with a standard deviation as high as 126ms, yet mainly in regions with low conduction velocity. Our shape modeling and UQ pipeline presented possible uncertainty in ECGI due to segmentation variability and can be used by researchers to reduce said uncertainty or mitigate its effects. The demonstrated use of statistical shape modeling and UQ can also be extended to other types of modeling pipelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":91037,"journal":{"name":"Paemi Sino","volume":"1 1","pages":"515-522"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9019843/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uncertainty Quantification of the Effects of Segmentation Variability in ECGI.\",\"authors\":\"Jess D Tate, Wilson Good, Nejib Zemzemi, Machteld Boonstra, Peter van Dam, Dana H Brooks, Akil Narayan, Rob S MacLeod\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/978-3-030-78710-3_49\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite advances in many of the techniques used in Electrocardiographic Imaging (ECGI), uncertainty remains insufficiently quantified for many aspects of the pipeline. The effect of geometric uncertainty, particularly due to segmentation variability, may be the least explored to date. We use statistical shape modeling and uncertainty quantification (UQ) to compute the effect of segmentation variability on ECGI solutions. The shape model was made with Shapeworks from nine segmentations of the same patient and incorporated into an ECGI pipeline. We computed uncertainty of the pericardial potentials and local activation times (LATs) using polynomial chaos expansion (PCE) implemented in UncertainSCI. Uncertainty in pericardial potentials from segmentation variation mirrored areas of high variability in the shape model, near the base of the heart and the right ventricular outflow tract, and that ECGI was less sensitive to uncertainty in the posterior region of the heart. Subsequently LAT calculations could vary dramatically due to segmentation variability, with a standard deviation as high as 126ms, yet mainly in regions with low conduction velocity. Our shape modeling and UQ pipeline presented possible uncertainty in ECGI due to segmentation variability and can be used by researchers to reduce said uncertainty or mitigate its effects. The demonstrated use of statistical shape modeling and UQ can also be extended to other types of modeling pipelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":91037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Paemi Sino\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"515-522\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9019843/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Paemi Sino\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78710-3_49\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/6/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paemi Sino","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78710-3_49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管心电图成像(ECGI)中使用的许多技术都在不断进步,但在管道的许多方面,不确定性仍未得到充分量化。迄今为止,几何不确定性的影响,尤其是由于分割变异造成的不确定性,可能是探索最少的。我们使用统计形状建模和不确定性量化(UQ)来计算分割可变性对心电图成像解决方案的影响。形状模型是用 Shapeworks 根据同一患者的九次分割建立的,并纳入心电图成像管道。我们使用 UncertainSCI 中的多项式混沌扩展 (PCE) 计算了心包电位和局部激活时间 (LAT) 的不确定性。心包电位因分割变化而产生的不确定性反映了形状模型中的高变化区域,即心脏底部和右心室流出道附近,ECGI 对心脏后部区域的不确定性不太敏感。随后,LAT 的计算结果会因分割变异而发生巨大变化,标准偏差高达 126 毫秒,但主要是在传导速度较低的区域。我们的形状建模和 UQ 管道展示了心电图成像中可能存在的因分割变异而导致的不确定性,研究人员可利用它们来减少上述不确定性或减轻其影响。统计形状建模和 UQ 的示范应用也可扩展到其他类型的建模管道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Uncertainty Quantification of the Effects of Segmentation Variability in ECGI.

Despite advances in many of the techniques used in Electrocardiographic Imaging (ECGI), uncertainty remains insufficiently quantified for many aspects of the pipeline. The effect of geometric uncertainty, particularly due to segmentation variability, may be the least explored to date. We use statistical shape modeling and uncertainty quantification (UQ) to compute the effect of segmentation variability on ECGI solutions. The shape model was made with Shapeworks from nine segmentations of the same patient and incorporated into an ECGI pipeline. We computed uncertainty of the pericardial potentials and local activation times (LATs) using polynomial chaos expansion (PCE) implemented in UncertainSCI. Uncertainty in pericardial potentials from segmentation variation mirrored areas of high variability in the shape model, near the base of the heart and the right ventricular outflow tract, and that ECGI was less sensitive to uncertainty in the posterior region of the heart. Subsequently LAT calculations could vary dramatically due to segmentation variability, with a standard deviation as high as 126ms, yet mainly in regions with low conduction velocity. Our shape modeling and UQ pipeline presented possible uncertainty in ECGI due to segmentation variability and can be used by researchers to reduce said uncertainty or mitigate its effects. The demonstrated use of statistical shape modeling and UQ can also be extended to other types of modeling pipelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Characterizing industry payments to US teaching hospitals and affiliated physicians: a cross-sectional analysis of the Open Payments datasets from 2016 to 2022. REPAIR OF SEVERE POST-BURN CICATRICIAL CONTRACTURES AND DEFORMATIONS OF THE LOWER LIMB ENDOSCOPIC DIAGNOSTICS AND TREATMENT OF INTRABILIARY RUPTURE OF LIVER HYDATID CYST INTRADURAL HYPOGLOSSAL SCHWANNOMA WITHOUT HYPOGLOSSAL PARALYSIS AND TONGUE ATROPHY: A CASE STUDY AND LITERATURE REVIEW EPIDEMIOLOGY AND RISK FACTORS FOR MATERNAL SEPSIS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1