伦敦图书教区的保存:允许访问档案装订的不同方法

Giorgia Genco, C. De Stefani
{"title":"伦敦图书教区的保存:允许访问档案装订的不同方法","authors":"Giorgia Genco, C. De Stefani","doi":"10.1080/18680860.2022.2111245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Archival bindings are interesting yet challenging objects for conservators to treat. The definition of this kind of binding is broad but minor details, such as the use of tackets and different lacing methods to attach the cover to the textblock, make each binding distinctive. Although these bindings exhibit different structures, one of their most common types of deterioration is a pronounced concave spine. When it comes to repairing these bindings, it is important to keep these differences in mind, and therefore conservation treatments need to be developed for each individual item. At London Metropolitan Archives (London, UK), the Diocese of London Consistory Court records offer a great resource for studying this type of binding, and conservators need to find solutions to maintain the potential historical information that a binding feature can reveal. This gentle approach is sometimes challenged by the need to enable safe handling by users, which may require a more interventive measure. This article describes different conservation treatments on three similar archival bindings from the sixteenth century that aimed to fulfil these requirements. Treatment options were chosen to maintain the binding features and allow safe access. We will describe how different approaches have led to different outcomes.","PeriodicalId":16666,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Paper Conservation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Conservation of the Diocese of London Consistory Court of London Books: Different Approaches for Allowing Access to Archival Bindings\",\"authors\":\"Giorgia Genco, C. De Stefani\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/18680860.2022.2111245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Archival bindings are interesting yet challenging objects for conservators to treat. The definition of this kind of binding is broad but minor details, such as the use of tackets and different lacing methods to attach the cover to the textblock, make each binding distinctive. Although these bindings exhibit different structures, one of their most common types of deterioration is a pronounced concave spine. When it comes to repairing these bindings, it is important to keep these differences in mind, and therefore conservation treatments need to be developed for each individual item. At London Metropolitan Archives (London, UK), the Diocese of London Consistory Court records offer a great resource for studying this type of binding, and conservators need to find solutions to maintain the potential historical information that a binding feature can reveal. This gentle approach is sometimes challenged by the need to enable safe handling by users, which may require a more interventive measure. This article describes different conservation treatments on three similar archival bindings from the sixteenth century that aimed to fulfil these requirements. Treatment options were chosen to maintain the binding features and allow safe access. We will describe how different approaches have led to different outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Paper Conservation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Paper Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/18680860.2022.2111245\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Paper Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18680860.2022.2111245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

档案绑定是一个有趣而又具有挑战性的对象。这类装订的定义很宽泛,但细节比较小,比如使用夹子和不同的绑扎方法将封面附着到文本块上,这使得每种装订都与众不同。虽然这些绑定表现出不同的结构,但它们最常见的退化类型之一是明显的脊柱凹。在修复这些绑定时,重要的是要记住这些差异,因此需要为每个单独的项目开发保护处理方法。在伦敦大都会档案馆(伦敦,英国),伦敦教区法院的记录为研究这种类型的装订提供了一个很好的资源,保管员需要找到解决方案来维护装订特征可以揭示的潜在历史信息。这种温和的方法有时会受到用户需要安全处理的挑战,这可能需要更具干预性的措施。本文描述了旨在满足这些要求的16世纪三个类似档案装订的不同保护处理。选择治疗方案以保持绑定特性并允许安全访问。我们将描述不同的方法如何导致不同的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Conservation of the Diocese of London Consistory Court of London Books: Different Approaches for Allowing Access to Archival Bindings
ABSTRACT Archival bindings are interesting yet challenging objects for conservators to treat. The definition of this kind of binding is broad but minor details, such as the use of tackets and different lacing methods to attach the cover to the textblock, make each binding distinctive. Although these bindings exhibit different structures, one of their most common types of deterioration is a pronounced concave spine. When it comes to repairing these bindings, it is important to keep these differences in mind, and therefore conservation treatments need to be developed for each individual item. At London Metropolitan Archives (London, UK), the Diocese of London Consistory Court records offer a great resource for studying this type of binding, and conservators need to find solutions to maintain the potential historical information that a binding feature can reveal. This gentle approach is sometimes challenged by the need to enable safe handling by users, which may require a more interventive measure. This article describes different conservation treatments on three similar archival bindings from the sixteenth century that aimed to fulfil these requirements. Treatment options were chosen to maintain the binding features and allow safe access. We will describe how different approaches have led to different outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hanging in There: The Extraordinary Development of Paper Curtains and the Conservation Treatment of a Rare Survivor Investigation and Conservation of Burnt Albumen Prints: The Bauduin Collection at the Rijksmuseum ‘The Graz Mummy Book’: The Oldest Known Codex Fragment from 260 BC Discovered at Graz University Library, Austria Encounter with the Father of Op Art, Victor Vasarely: Research in Conservation and Art History, and Conservation Work on the Barson Collage ‘Permanent changing exhibition’ – promotion of preventive conservation on the example of the Stanisław Wyspiański museum, a branch of the national museum in Krakow, Poland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1