比较在叶片尺度上测量和基于物理的农业水文模型计算的实际蒸腾通量

IF 2.4 4区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING Journal of Agricultural Engineering Pub Date : 2023-06-20 DOI:10.4081/jae.2023.1527
Ameneh Sobhani, S. Hassan, G. Dragonetti, R. Balestrini, M. Centritto, A. Coppola, A. Comegna
{"title":"比较在叶片尺度上测量和基于物理的农业水文模型计算的实际蒸腾通量","authors":"Ameneh Sobhani, S. Hassan, G. Dragonetti, R. Balestrini, M. Centritto, A. Coppola, A. Comegna","doi":"10.4081/jae.2023.1527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main purpose of this paper is to compare the actual transpiration rates from tomato crop, as measured at leaf scale and estimated by a macroscopic approach in an agro-hydrological model, named FLOWS-HAGES, under variable soil properties and water availability. To this aim, sixteen plots were cultivated with tomatoes in Metaponto, Southern Italy. Soil hydraulic properties (SHP) were obtained using a fast in-situ characterization method. Leaf-area index (LAI) was measured using a leaf-area meter. SHP and LAI were then used in the physically-based FLOWS-HAGES which allowed calculating the macroscopic transpiration rates, Ta,m. Single-leaf transpiration rates, Ta,l, and stomatal conductance, gs,l, were measured in situ. For comparing with Ta,m, gs,l was upscaled by Big-Leaf approach to canopy scale stomatal conductance, gs,c, which was applied to Penman-Monteith model to obtain the canopy-scale transpiration, Ta,c. Finally, multiple linear regression (MLR) was used to find the statistical relationship between Ta,m and Ta,c, and the SHP and gs,c. Results showed that the macroscopic approach smooths the spatial variability of transpiration rates. Ta,c increased with the saturated water content, θs, and the slope of the water retention curve, n, while Ta,m decreased with increasing θs and n. MLR improved significantly by introducing gs,c to predict Ta,m.","PeriodicalId":48507,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Engineering","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing actual transpiration fluxes as measured at leaf-scale and calculated by a physically based agro-hydrological model\",\"authors\":\"Ameneh Sobhani, S. Hassan, G. Dragonetti, R. Balestrini, M. Centritto, A. Coppola, A. Comegna\",\"doi\":\"10.4081/jae.2023.1527\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main purpose of this paper is to compare the actual transpiration rates from tomato crop, as measured at leaf scale and estimated by a macroscopic approach in an agro-hydrological model, named FLOWS-HAGES, under variable soil properties and water availability. To this aim, sixteen plots were cultivated with tomatoes in Metaponto, Southern Italy. Soil hydraulic properties (SHP) were obtained using a fast in-situ characterization method. Leaf-area index (LAI) was measured using a leaf-area meter. SHP and LAI were then used in the physically-based FLOWS-HAGES which allowed calculating the macroscopic transpiration rates, Ta,m. Single-leaf transpiration rates, Ta,l, and stomatal conductance, gs,l, were measured in situ. For comparing with Ta,m, gs,l was upscaled by Big-Leaf approach to canopy scale stomatal conductance, gs,c, which was applied to Penman-Monteith model to obtain the canopy-scale transpiration, Ta,c. Finally, multiple linear regression (MLR) was used to find the statistical relationship between Ta,m and Ta,c, and the SHP and gs,c. Results showed that the macroscopic approach smooths the spatial variability of transpiration rates. Ta,c increased with the saturated water content, θs, and the slope of the water retention curve, n, while Ta,m decreased with increasing θs and n. MLR improved significantly by introducing gs,c to predict Ta,m.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agricultural Engineering\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agricultural Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2023.1527\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2023.1527","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的主要目的是比较番茄作物在叶片尺度上的实际蒸腾速率,并在一个名为FLOWS-HAGES的农业水文模型中通过宏观方法估计,在不同的土壤性质和水分有效性下。为了达到这个目的,在意大利南部的梅塔波托种植了16块西红柿。采用快速原位表征方法获得土壤水力特性(SHP)。叶面积指数(LAI)采用叶面积计测定。然后将SHP和LAI用于基于物理的FLOWS-HAGES,可以计算宏观蒸腾速率,Ta,m。原位测定单叶蒸腾速率Ta,l和气孔导度gs,l。为了与Ta,m, gs,l相比,通过大叶方法将其升级为冠层尺度气孔导度,gs,c,并将其应用于Penman-Monteith模型,得到冠层尺度蒸腾,Ta,c。最后,利用多元线性回归(MLR)分析了Ta,m和Ta,c以及SHP和gs,c之间的统计关系。结果表明,宏观方法平滑了蒸腾速率的空间变异性。Ta,c随饱和含水量θs和保水曲线斜率n的增大而增大,Ta,m随θs和n的增大而减小。引入gs,c来预测Ta,m, MLR显著提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing actual transpiration fluxes as measured at leaf-scale and calculated by a physically based agro-hydrological model
The main purpose of this paper is to compare the actual transpiration rates from tomato crop, as measured at leaf scale and estimated by a macroscopic approach in an agro-hydrological model, named FLOWS-HAGES, under variable soil properties and water availability. To this aim, sixteen plots were cultivated with tomatoes in Metaponto, Southern Italy. Soil hydraulic properties (SHP) were obtained using a fast in-situ characterization method. Leaf-area index (LAI) was measured using a leaf-area meter. SHP and LAI were then used in the physically-based FLOWS-HAGES which allowed calculating the macroscopic transpiration rates, Ta,m. Single-leaf transpiration rates, Ta,l, and stomatal conductance, gs,l, were measured in situ. For comparing with Ta,m, gs,l was upscaled by Big-Leaf approach to canopy scale stomatal conductance, gs,c, which was applied to Penman-Monteith model to obtain the canopy-scale transpiration, Ta,c. Finally, multiple linear regression (MLR) was used to find the statistical relationship between Ta,m and Ta,c, and the SHP and gs,c. Results showed that the macroscopic approach smooths the spatial variability of transpiration rates. Ta,c increased with the saturated water content, θs, and the slope of the water retention curve, n, while Ta,m decreased with increasing θs and n. MLR improved significantly by introducing gs,c to predict Ta,m.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural Engineering
Journal of Agricultural Engineering AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
40
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agricultural Engineering (JAE) is the official journal of the Italian Society of Agricultural Engineering supported by University of Bologna, Italy. The subject matter covers a complete and interdisciplinary range of research in engineering for agriculture and biosystems.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of two different artificial neural network models for prediction of soil penetration resistance Apple recognition and picking sequence planning for harvesting robot in the complex environment Monitoring and multi-scenario simulation of agricultural land changes using Landsat imageries and FLUS model on coastal Alanya Variable-rate spray system for unmanned aerial applications using lag compensation algorithm and pulse width modulation spray technology Comparative analysis of 2D and 3D vineyard yield prediction system using artificial intelligence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1