光化性角化病的常规和日光光动力治疗期间的血流动力学变化-一项随机对照试验。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY Journal of Dermatological Treatment Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1080/09546634.2022.2097160
J Hartmann, A Keller, A Enk, P Gholam
{"title":"光化性角化病的常规和日光光动力治疗期间的血流动力学变化-一项随机对照试验。","authors":"J Hartmann,&nbsp;A Keller,&nbsp;A Enk,&nbsp;P Gholam","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2022.2097160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an effective treatment for actinic keratosis (AK). However, pain and hypertension are important side effects of conventional PDT (c-PDT). Several studies have demonstrated that daylight PDT (dl-PDT) is less painful while being as effective as c-PDT.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To observe the effect of c-PDT and dl-PDT on different hemodynamic parameters (systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, and peripheral oxygen saturation).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty patients with AK on the head were enrolled into this prospective, randomized, controlled study and treated with c-PDT or dl-PDT in a 1:1 ratio. Hemodynamic parameters were measured at four different time points during treatment. Pain was quantified using a visual analog scale. AK was counted before treatment and after one month.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>C-PDT is associated with significantly more pain, a significant increase in blood pressure and a higher rate of patients with grade 3 hypertension. Whereas dl-PDT is almost painless and does not lead to any changes in hemodynamic parameters. For both treatments, a similar lesion response rate was found after one month.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>dl-PDT has a better tolerability while being as effective as c-PDT and therefore may be the more favorable treatment option in certain patient groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":15639,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dermatological Treatment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hemodynamic changes during conventional and daylight photodynamic therapy of actinic keratoses - a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"J Hartmann,&nbsp;A Keller,&nbsp;A Enk,&nbsp;P Gholam\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09546634.2022.2097160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an effective treatment for actinic keratosis (AK). However, pain and hypertension are important side effects of conventional PDT (c-PDT). Several studies have demonstrated that daylight PDT (dl-PDT) is less painful while being as effective as c-PDT.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To observe the effect of c-PDT and dl-PDT on different hemodynamic parameters (systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, and peripheral oxygen saturation).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty patients with AK on the head were enrolled into this prospective, randomized, controlled study and treated with c-PDT or dl-PDT in a 1:1 ratio. Hemodynamic parameters were measured at four different time points during treatment. Pain was quantified using a visual analog scale. AK was counted before treatment and after one month.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>C-PDT is associated with significantly more pain, a significant increase in blood pressure and a higher rate of patients with grade 3 hypertension. Whereas dl-PDT is almost painless and does not lead to any changes in hemodynamic parameters. For both treatments, a similar lesion response rate was found after one month.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>dl-PDT has a better tolerability while being as effective as c-PDT and therefore may be the more favorable treatment option in certain patient groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dermatological Treatment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dermatological Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2022.2097160\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dermatological Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2022.2097160","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:光动力疗法(PDT)是治疗光化性角化病(AK)的有效方法。然而,疼痛和高血压是常规PDT (c-PDT)的重要副作用。几项研究表明,日光PDT (dl-PDT)与c-PDT一样有效,但痛苦更少。目的:观察c-PDT和dl-PDT对不同血流动力学参数(收缩压、舒张压、脉搏率、外周血氧饱和度)的影响。方法:50例头部AK患者被纳入这项前瞻性、随机、对照研究,并按1:1比例接受c-PDT或dl-PDT治疗。在治疗期间的四个不同时间点测量血流动力学参数。用视觉模拟量表对疼痛进行量化。治疗前和治疗后1个月分别计算AK值。结果:C-PDT与明显加重的疼痛、明显升高的血压和更高的3级高血压患者发生率相关。而dl-PDT几乎是无痛的,不会导致任何血流动力学参数的改变。对于两种治疗,一个月后发现相似的病变缓解率。结论:dl-PDT具有更好的耐受性,同时与c-PDT一样有效,因此在某些患者群体中可能是更有利的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hemodynamic changes during conventional and daylight photodynamic therapy of actinic keratoses - a randomized controlled trial.

Background: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an effective treatment for actinic keratosis (AK). However, pain and hypertension are important side effects of conventional PDT (c-PDT). Several studies have demonstrated that daylight PDT (dl-PDT) is less painful while being as effective as c-PDT.

Objective: To observe the effect of c-PDT and dl-PDT on different hemodynamic parameters (systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, and peripheral oxygen saturation).

Methods: Fifty patients with AK on the head were enrolled into this prospective, randomized, controlled study and treated with c-PDT or dl-PDT in a 1:1 ratio. Hemodynamic parameters were measured at four different time points during treatment. Pain was quantified using a visual analog scale. AK was counted before treatment and after one month.

Results: C-PDT is associated with significantly more pain, a significant increase in blood pressure and a higher rate of patients with grade 3 hypertension. Whereas dl-PDT is almost painless and does not lead to any changes in hemodynamic parameters. For both treatments, a similar lesion response rate was found after one month.

Conclusions: dl-PDT has a better tolerability while being as effective as c-PDT and therefore may be the more favorable treatment option in certain patient groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
145
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dermatological Treatment covers all aspects of the treatment of skin disease, including the use of topical and systematically administered drugs and other forms of therapy. The Journal of Dermatological Treatment is positioned to give dermatologists cutting edge information on new treatments in all areas of dermatology. It also publishes valuable clinical reviews and theoretical papers on dermatological treatments.
期刊最新文献
Boxed warnings for dermatologic JAK inhibitors: are they standardized worldwide? A review of biosimilars in psoriasis: impacts on efficacy, safety, access, and a first-hand look at biosimilar cost savings within the department of veterans affairs Postoperative risk assessment of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation and the efficacy of delayed prevention following 532 nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser treatment of solar lentigines: a randomized controlled study. Biodegradable polymers and platelet-rich plasma causing visual impairment: a literature review. Exploring the effect of deucravacitinib in patients with palmoplantar pustular psoriasis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1