哮喘控制与医疗费用之间的关系:来自德国相关数据研究的结果。

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Services Management Research Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1177/09514848221100749
Thomas Wilke, Hartmut Timmermann, Sabrina Mueller, Fraence Hardtstock, Victoria Unmuessig, Robert R Welte, Ulf Maywald
{"title":"哮喘控制与医疗费用之间的关系:来自德国相关数据研究的结果。","authors":"Thomas Wilke,&nbsp;Hartmut Timmermann,&nbsp;Sabrina Mueller,&nbsp;Fraence Hardtstock,&nbsp;Victoria Unmuessig,&nbsp;Robert R Welte,&nbsp;Ulf Maywald","doi":"10.1177/09514848221100749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: This study aimed to evaluate differences in healthcare resource utilization and cost among patients with controlled and uncontrolled asthma.<b>Methods</b>: Claims data from a German sickness fund was linked to patient survey data. Outpatient physicians enrolled patients and assessed asthma control using the ACT<sup>TM</sup> questionnaire. All-cause and asthma-specific healthcare resource use (HCRU)/costs were compared descriptively and based on multivariable models using a continuous ACT<sup>TM</sup> score.<b>Results</b>: Overall, 492 asthma patients were included (mean age: 53.8, 73.8% female). The mean/median ACT<sup>TM</sup> score was 19.9/20.7, with 183 patients (37.2%) classified as having uncontrolled asthma (mean ACT<sup>TM</sup> score<20) Patients with uncontrolled asthma had significantly more hospitalizations (<i>p</i> = .035) and medication prescriptions (<i>p</i> < .001), which resulted in higher total healthcare costs for asthma-related (€1785 vs. €1615; <i>p</i> = .004) and all-cause care (€4695 vs. €4117; <i>p</i> = .009). While controlling for baseline characteristics, multivariable models confirmed a negative association between asthma control and total all-cause healthcare costs (<i>p</i> = .008), total asthma-related costs (<i>p</i> = .008), and costs of medication prescriptions (<i>p</i> = .001). However, no significant association was found for all-cause (<i>p</i> = .062) and asthma-related hospitalization costs (<i>p</i> = .576).<b>Conclusion</b>: Considering continuous patient care, improving asthma control is not only desirable from a clinical perspective, but could also be an effective approach to reduce asthma-related HCRU and cost burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":45801,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Management Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between asthma control and healthcare costs: Results from a German linked data study.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Wilke,&nbsp;Hartmut Timmermann,&nbsp;Sabrina Mueller,&nbsp;Fraence Hardtstock,&nbsp;Victoria Unmuessig,&nbsp;Robert R Welte,&nbsp;Ulf Maywald\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09514848221100749\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: This study aimed to evaluate differences in healthcare resource utilization and cost among patients with controlled and uncontrolled asthma.<b>Methods</b>: Claims data from a German sickness fund was linked to patient survey data. Outpatient physicians enrolled patients and assessed asthma control using the ACT<sup>TM</sup> questionnaire. All-cause and asthma-specific healthcare resource use (HCRU)/costs were compared descriptively and based on multivariable models using a continuous ACT<sup>TM</sup> score.<b>Results</b>: Overall, 492 asthma patients were included (mean age: 53.8, 73.8% female). The mean/median ACT<sup>TM</sup> score was 19.9/20.7, with 183 patients (37.2%) classified as having uncontrolled asthma (mean ACT<sup>TM</sup> score<20) Patients with uncontrolled asthma had significantly more hospitalizations (<i>p</i> = .035) and medication prescriptions (<i>p</i> < .001), which resulted in higher total healthcare costs for asthma-related (€1785 vs. €1615; <i>p</i> = .004) and all-cause care (€4695 vs. €4117; <i>p</i> = .009). While controlling for baseline characteristics, multivariable models confirmed a negative association between asthma control and total all-cause healthcare costs (<i>p</i> = .008), total asthma-related costs (<i>p</i> = .008), and costs of medication prescriptions (<i>p</i> = .001). However, no significant association was found for all-cause (<i>p</i> = .062) and asthma-related hospitalization costs (<i>p</i> = .576).<b>Conclusion</b>: Considering continuous patient care, improving asthma control is not only desirable from a clinical perspective, but could also be an effective approach to reduce asthma-related HCRU and cost burden.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Services Management Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Services Management Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09514848221100749\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Management Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09514848221100749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评估控制与非控制哮喘患者在医疗资源利用和成本方面的差异。方法:来自德国疾病基金的索赔数据与患者调查数据相关联。门诊医生登记患者并使用ACTTM问卷评估哮喘控制。采用连续ACTTM评分对全因和哮喘特异性医疗资源使用(HCRU)/成本进行描述性和基于多变量模型的比较。结果:共纳入492例哮喘患者(平均年龄:53.8岁,73.8%为女性)。平均/中位数ACTTM评分为19.9/20.7,其中183例(37.2%)患者被归类为哮喘不受控制(平均ACTTM评分= 0.035)和药物处方(p < 0.001),这导致哮喘相关的总医疗费用较高(1785欧元对1615欧元;P = 0.004)和全因护理(4695欧元对4117欧元;P = .009)。在控制基线特征的同时,多变量模型证实了哮喘控制与全因医疗保健总成本(p = 0.008)、哮喘相关总成本(p = 0.008)和药物处方成本(p = 0.001)之间的负相关。然而,全因(p = 0.062)和哮喘相关住院费用(p = 0.576)之间没有发现显著关联。结论:考虑到患者的持续护理,改善哮喘控制不仅是临床需要的,也是降低哮喘相关HCRU和费用负担的有效途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association between asthma control and healthcare costs: Results from a German linked data study.

Background: This study aimed to evaluate differences in healthcare resource utilization and cost among patients with controlled and uncontrolled asthma.Methods: Claims data from a German sickness fund was linked to patient survey data. Outpatient physicians enrolled patients and assessed asthma control using the ACTTM questionnaire. All-cause and asthma-specific healthcare resource use (HCRU)/costs were compared descriptively and based on multivariable models using a continuous ACTTM score.Results: Overall, 492 asthma patients were included (mean age: 53.8, 73.8% female). The mean/median ACTTM score was 19.9/20.7, with 183 patients (37.2%) classified as having uncontrolled asthma (mean ACTTM score<20) Patients with uncontrolled asthma had significantly more hospitalizations (p = .035) and medication prescriptions (p < .001), which resulted in higher total healthcare costs for asthma-related (€1785 vs. €1615; p = .004) and all-cause care (€4695 vs. €4117; p = .009). While controlling for baseline characteristics, multivariable models confirmed a negative association between asthma control and total all-cause healthcare costs (p = .008), total asthma-related costs (p = .008), and costs of medication prescriptions (p = .001). However, no significant association was found for all-cause (p = .062) and asthma-related hospitalization costs (p = .576).Conclusion: Considering continuous patient care, improving asthma control is not only desirable from a clinical perspective, but could also be an effective approach to reduce asthma-related HCRU and cost burden.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Management Research
Health Services Management Research HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Health Services Management Research (HSMR) is an authoritative international peer-reviewed journal which publishes theoretically and empirically rigorous research on questions of enduring interest to health-care organizations and systems throughout the world. Examining the real issues confronting health services management, it provides an independent view and cutting edge evidence-based research to guide policy-making and management decision-making. HSMR aims to be a forum serving an international community of academics and researchers on the one hand and healthcare managers, executives, policymakers and clinicians and all health professionals on the other. HSMR wants to make a substantial contribution to both research and managerial practice, with particular emphasis placed on publishing studies which offer actionable findings and on promoting knowledge mobilisation toward theoretical advances.
期刊最新文献
An exploration of factors leading to readiness for organizational health literacy change in community-based health organizations. The (very real) risk of irrelevance, and the great opportunity. Financial management, efficiency, and care quality: A systematic review in the context of Health 4.0. The impact of policy and technology infrastructure on telehealth utilization. Factors influencing use of eHealth services during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1