什么因素影响枕髁骨折的最终结局?

IF 0.3 Q4 SURGERY Indian Journal of Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2023-08-10 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1771496
U. Srinivasan, Al-Busaidi Ali Sultan, E. Abdalla, Aliya Mubarak
{"title":"什么因素影响枕髁骨折的最终结局?","authors":"U. Srinivasan, Al-Busaidi Ali Sultan, E. Abdalla, Aliya Mubarak","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1771496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction  Diagnosis of occipital condyle fracture (OCF) following a trauma needs high awareness among the trauma surgeons. Aim  In our study, we attempt to discern if any factor or a combination of factors influences the final outcome following OCF. Materials and Methods  We prospectively analyzed the outcome in OCF patients admitted during 2017 to 2019 at our center. We had 14 patients with polytrauma with OCF. Among them two were lost for follow-up. So, 12 patients were followed up for 6 months after injury. The following 10 factors were analyzed—age, sex, injury, Glasgow Coma Scale, Injury Severity Score, spinal injury, associated injuries, blood pressure, medical conditions, and surgical intervention. Outcome was divided into good and poor outcomes. Chi-squared test was used. All these patients were treated conservatively for OCF for 3 months. Results  There was no significant factor, since p -value was greater than 0.05 for all variables. Only Injury Severity Score (0.091) was close to the significant p -value. Seven patients had severe head injuries and among them one died and four had the worst outcome. Among the five patients who had spinal injuries, only two had good outcomes. Conclusion  Our results indicate that the outcome following OCF is not determined by any single factor. Injury Severity Score comes close to determining the final outcome. This indicates that the overall patient management especially of associated injuries is the determining factor in the outcome in patients who had sustained OCF.","PeriodicalId":53938,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Neurosurgery","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Factors Influence the Final Outcome in Occipital Condyle Fractures?\",\"authors\":\"U. Srinivasan, Al-Busaidi Ali Sultan, E. Abdalla, Aliya Mubarak\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0043-1771496\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Introduction  Diagnosis of occipital condyle fracture (OCF) following a trauma needs high awareness among the trauma surgeons. Aim  In our study, we attempt to discern if any factor or a combination of factors influences the final outcome following OCF. Materials and Methods  We prospectively analyzed the outcome in OCF patients admitted during 2017 to 2019 at our center. We had 14 patients with polytrauma with OCF. Among them two were lost for follow-up. So, 12 patients were followed up for 6 months after injury. The following 10 factors were analyzed—age, sex, injury, Glasgow Coma Scale, Injury Severity Score, spinal injury, associated injuries, blood pressure, medical conditions, and surgical intervention. Outcome was divided into good and poor outcomes. Chi-squared test was used. All these patients were treated conservatively for OCF for 3 months. Results  There was no significant factor, since p -value was greater than 0.05 for all variables. Only Injury Severity Score (0.091) was close to the significant p -value. Seven patients had severe head injuries and among them one died and four had the worst outcome. Among the five patients who had spinal injuries, only two had good outcomes. Conclusion  Our results indicate that the outcome following OCF is not determined by any single factor. Injury Severity Score comes close to determining the final outcome. This indicates that the overall patient management especially of associated injuries is the determining factor in the outcome in patients who had sustained OCF.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771496\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771496","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要简介创伤后枕髁骨折(OCF)的诊断需要创伤外科医生的高度重视。目的在我们的研究中,我们试图辨别是否有任何因素或因素的组合影响OCF后的最终结果。材料与方法前瞻性分析2017 - 2019年在本中心收治的OCF患者的预后。我们有14例伴有OCF的多发创伤患者。其中2例失访。12例患者伤后随访6个月。分析以下10个因素:年龄、性别、损伤、格拉斯哥昏迷评分、损伤严重程度评分、脊柱损伤、相关损伤、血压、医疗条件和手术干预。结果分为好结果和差结果。采用卡方检验。所有患者均保守治疗OCF 3个月。结果各变量p值均大于0.05,无显著性影响因素。只有损伤严重程度评分(0.091)接近显著p值。7名患者头部严重受伤,其中1人死亡,4人预后最差。在5例脊髓损伤患者中,仅有2例预后良好。结论OCF术后的预后不是由单一因素决定的。损伤严重程度评分接近于决定最终结果。这表明,患者的整体管理,特别是相关损伤的管理是持续性OCF患者预后的决定性因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What Factors Influence the Final Outcome in Occipital Condyle Fractures?
Abstract Introduction  Diagnosis of occipital condyle fracture (OCF) following a trauma needs high awareness among the trauma surgeons. Aim  In our study, we attempt to discern if any factor or a combination of factors influences the final outcome following OCF. Materials and Methods  We prospectively analyzed the outcome in OCF patients admitted during 2017 to 2019 at our center. We had 14 patients with polytrauma with OCF. Among them two were lost for follow-up. So, 12 patients were followed up for 6 months after injury. The following 10 factors were analyzed—age, sex, injury, Glasgow Coma Scale, Injury Severity Score, spinal injury, associated injuries, blood pressure, medical conditions, and surgical intervention. Outcome was divided into good and poor outcomes. Chi-squared test was used. All these patients were treated conservatively for OCF for 3 months. Results  There was no significant factor, since p -value was greater than 0.05 for all variables. Only Injury Severity Score (0.091) was close to the significant p -value. Seven patients had severe head injuries and among them one died and four had the worst outcome. Among the five patients who had spinal injuries, only two had good outcomes. Conclusion  Our results indicate that the outcome following OCF is not determined by any single factor. Injury Severity Score comes close to determining the final outcome. This indicates that the overall patient management especially of associated injuries is the determining factor in the outcome in patients who had sustained OCF.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cranial Migration of a VP Shunt—A Routine Procedure with a Rare Complication! Ruptured Cerebral Aneurysms and Dissecting Aneurysms in Patients with COVID-19: A Case Series and Literature Review Encephalocele within the Lateral Wall of the Sphenoid Sinus Presenting with Recurrent Meningitis and Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea Repaired via Endoscopic Transnasal Transpterygoid Approach Complete Intraventricular Migration of Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt: Once in a Blue Moon Phenomenon of Shunt Surgery Brush Sign in Cortical Venous Sinus Thrombosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1