扭转对获得生殖保健服务的刑事定罪。

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 Q3 LAW American Journal of Law & Medicine Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1017/amj.2022.22
Meghan Boone
{"title":"扭转对获得生殖保健服务的刑事定罪。","authors":"Meghan Boone","doi":"10.1017/amj.2022.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The state is increasingly criminalizing reproduction. While prosecutions of pregnant people for prenatal drug use began occurring several decades ago,<sup>1</sup> this type of prosecution remained relatively rare for many years.<sup>2</sup> But such prosecutions have increased dramatically-thousands have now occurred across the United States.<sup>3</sup> In addition, the criminalization of reproduction is not limited to instances of prenatal drug use,<sup>4</sup> but extends to a wide array of prosecutions in the reproductive space-including the criminalization of stillbirth,<sup>5</sup> miscarriage,<sup>6</sup> breastfeeding,<sup>7</sup> home births,<sup>8</sup> and c-section refusals.<sup>9</sup> And, of course, recent changes in the Supreme Court have resulted in an almost certain change in the criminal regulation of abortion, as well.<sup>10</sup> The criminalization of reproduction often occurs at an initial point of access to the health care system - at the hospital, the doctor's office, the lactation consultant appointment, or the addiction treatment clinic. In this way, health care settings become gateways into the criminal justice system, and it is the attempt to access reproductive health care that results in criminal prosecution.<sup>11</sup>.</p>","PeriodicalId":7680,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Law & Medicine","volume":"48 2-3","pages":"200-208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reversing the Criminalization of Reproductive Health Care Access.\",\"authors\":\"Meghan Boone\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/amj.2022.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The state is increasingly criminalizing reproduction. While prosecutions of pregnant people for prenatal drug use began occurring several decades ago,<sup>1</sup> this type of prosecution remained relatively rare for many years.<sup>2</sup> But such prosecutions have increased dramatically-thousands have now occurred across the United States.<sup>3</sup> In addition, the criminalization of reproduction is not limited to instances of prenatal drug use,<sup>4</sup> but extends to a wide array of prosecutions in the reproductive space-including the criminalization of stillbirth,<sup>5</sup> miscarriage,<sup>6</sup> breastfeeding,<sup>7</sup> home births,<sup>8</sup> and c-section refusals.<sup>9</sup> And, of course, recent changes in the Supreme Court have resulted in an almost certain change in the criminal regulation of abortion, as well.<sup>10</sup> The criminalization of reproduction often occurs at an initial point of access to the health care system - at the hospital, the doctor's office, the lactation consultant appointment, or the addiction treatment clinic. In this way, health care settings become gateways into the criminal justice system, and it is the attempt to access reproductive health care that results in criminal prosecution.<sup>11</sup>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Law & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"48 2-3\",\"pages\":\"200-208\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Law & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/amj.2022.22\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Law & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/amj.2022.22","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国家越来越把生育定为犯罪。虽然对孕妇在产前使用药物的起诉在几十年前就开始发生了,但这种类型的起诉多年来一直相对罕见但是这样的起诉急剧增加——现在在美国已经发生了数千起。此外,对生育的刑事定罪并不局限于产前吸毒的情况,而是扩展到生殖领域的一系列广泛的起诉,包括对死胎、流产、母乳喂养、在家分娩、拒绝剖腹产的刑事定罪当然,最近最高法院的变动也几乎必然导致了对堕胎的刑事规定的变化对生育的刑事定罪往往发生在最初获得医疗保健系统的地方——医院、医生办公室、哺乳顾问预约或成瘾治疗诊所。这样,卫生保健机构就成为进入刑事司法系统的门户,正是试图获得生殖保健导致了刑事起诉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reversing the Criminalization of Reproductive Health Care Access.

The state is increasingly criminalizing reproduction. While prosecutions of pregnant people for prenatal drug use began occurring several decades ago,1 this type of prosecution remained relatively rare for many years.2 But such prosecutions have increased dramatically-thousands have now occurred across the United States.3 In addition, the criminalization of reproduction is not limited to instances of prenatal drug use,4 but extends to a wide array of prosecutions in the reproductive space-including the criminalization of stillbirth,5 miscarriage,6 breastfeeding,7 home births,8 and c-section refusals.9 And, of course, recent changes in the Supreme Court have resulted in an almost certain change in the criminal regulation of abortion, as well.10 The criminalization of reproduction often occurs at an initial point of access to the health care system - at the hospital, the doctor's office, the lactation consultant appointment, or the addiction treatment clinic. In this way, health care settings become gateways into the criminal justice system, and it is the attempt to access reproductive health care that results in criminal prosecution.11.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: desde Enero 2004 Último Numero: Octubre 2008 AJLM will solicit blind comments from expert peer reviewers, including faculty members of our editorial board, as well as from other preeminent health law and public policy academics and professionals from across the country and around the world.
期刊最新文献
A Protected Class, An Unprotected Condition, and A Biomarker - A Method/Formula for Increased Diversity in Clinical Trials for the African American Subject with Benign Ethnic Neutropenia (BEN) - CORRIGENDUM. "The Timeless Explosion of Fantasy's Dream": How State Courts Have Ignored the Supreme Court's Decision in Panetti v. Quarterman - ERRATUM. Mental Health Matters: A Look At Abortion Law Post-Dobbs - ERRATUM. Abortion Access for Women in Custody in the Wake of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health. How The "Great Resignation" and COVID Unemployment Have Eroded the Employer Sponsored Insurance Model and Access to Healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1