一种新型自动压力控制桡动脉压缩装置对桡动脉压缩的影响:一项短期前瞻性介入先导研究。

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of interventional cardiology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2023/7533702
HaiZhen Xu, Junya Cheng, DanYing Zhang, Liang Shen, Yingjie Jiang, ChangLin Zhai
{"title":"一种新型自动压力控制桡动脉压缩装置对桡动脉压缩的影响:一项短期前瞻性介入先导研究。","authors":"HaiZhen Xu,&nbsp;Junya Cheng,&nbsp;DanYing Zhang,&nbsp;Liang Shen,&nbsp;Yingjie Jiang,&nbsp;ChangLin Zhai","doi":"10.1155/2023/7533702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was conducted to design a novel radial compression device with the function of automatic pressure control and evaluate the feasibility and safety of this new technique. Patients who underwent transradial access (TRA) coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the First Hospital of Jiaxing between August 2021and October 2021 were prospectively enrolled in this pilot interventional study. The patients were grouped in a 1 : 1 ratio to receive compression with a novel device (the experimental group) or a conventional device without pressure control (the control group). The primary endpoint was the compression time, and the main secondary endpoints were rebleeding, upper-limb swelling, radial artery occlusion (RAO), and device-related pressure injury (DPI). Eighty-four patients were enrolled in this study. No significant differences were found in the baseline clinical characteristics between the two groups. Compared with the control group, the compression time in the experimental group was significantly reduced (207.4 ± 15.5 vs. 378.1 ± 19 min, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Besides, the rate of upper-limb swelling was also significantly lower in the novel device group (2.4% vs. 85.7%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), as well as the rate of DPI (19.05% vs. 100%, <i>p</i> = 0.005). Furthermore, the pain score in the experimental group was significantly lower than in the control group (0.79 ± 0.42 vs. 1.83 ± 0.58, <i>p</i> < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the rate of rebleeding (7.1% vs. 14.3, <i>p</i> = 0.48) between the two groups. In addition, no RAO occurred in any of the groups. The novel automatic pressure-controlled radial compression device could reduce the hemostasis time and decrease the rate of adverse complications. It might be a promising and effective compression device in TRA coronary invasive procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2023 ","pages":"7533702"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10014152/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Radial Artery Compression with a Novel Automatic Pressure-Controlled Radial Compression Device: A Short-Term Prospective Interventional Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"HaiZhen Xu,&nbsp;Junya Cheng,&nbsp;DanYing Zhang,&nbsp;Liang Shen,&nbsp;Yingjie Jiang,&nbsp;ChangLin Zhai\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/7533702\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study was conducted to design a novel radial compression device with the function of automatic pressure control and evaluate the feasibility and safety of this new technique. Patients who underwent transradial access (TRA) coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the First Hospital of Jiaxing between August 2021and October 2021 were prospectively enrolled in this pilot interventional study. The patients were grouped in a 1 : 1 ratio to receive compression with a novel device (the experimental group) or a conventional device without pressure control (the control group). The primary endpoint was the compression time, and the main secondary endpoints were rebleeding, upper-limb swelling, radial artery occlusion (RAO), and device-related pressure injury (DPI). Eighty-four patients were enrolled in this study. No significant differences were found in the baseline clinical characteristics between the two groups. Compared with the control group, the compression time in the experimental group was significantly reduced (207.4 ± 15.5 vs. 378.1 ± 19 min, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Besides, the rate of upper-limb swelling was also significantly lower in the novel device group (2.4% vs. 85.7%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), as well as the rate of DPI (19.05% vs. 100%, <i>p</i> = 0.005). Furthermore, the pain score in the experimental group was significantly lower than in the control group (0.79 ± 0.42 vs. 1.83 ± 0.58, <i>p</i> < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the rate of rebleeding (7.1% vs. 14.3, <i>p</i> = 0.48) between the two groups. In addition, no RAO occurred in any of the groups. The novel automatic pressure-controlled radial compression device could reduce the hemostasis time and decrease the rate of adverse complications. It might be a promising and effective compression device in TRA coronary invasive procedures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of interventional cardiology\",\"volume\":\"2023 \",\"pages\":\"7533702\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10014152/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of interventional cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7533702\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interventional cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7533702","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

设计了一种具有压力自动控制功能的径向压缩装置,并对其可行性和安全性进行了评价。2021年8月至2021年10月期间在嘉兴市第一医院行经桡动脉通道(TRA)冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者被前瞻性纳入本介入试验研究。患者按1:1的比例进行分组,分别使用新型装置(实验组)和无压力控制的传统装置(对照组)进行按压。主要终点为压迫时间,次要终点为再出血、上肢肿胀、桡动脉闭塞(RAO)和器械相关压力损伤(DPI)。84名患者参加了这项研究。两组患者的基线临床特征无显著差异。与对照组相比,实验组压缩时间明显缩短(207.4±15.5 vs. 378.1±19 min, p p p = 0.005)。实验组疼痛评分明显低于对照组(0.79±0.42∶1.83±0.58,p p = 0.48)。此外,在任何组中均未发生RAO。该新型自动压力控制径向压缩装置可缩短止血时间,降低不良并发症发生率。它可能是一种有前途和有效的压缩装置在TRA冠状动脉侵入性手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Radial Artery Compression with a Novel Automatic Pressure-Controlled Radial Compression Device: A Short-Term Prospective Interventional Pilot Study.

This study was conducted to design a novel radial compression device with the function of automatic pressure control and evaluate the feasibility and safety of this new technique. Patients who underwent transradial access (TRA) coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the First Hospital of Jiaxing between August 2021and October 2021 were prospectively enrolled in this pilot interventional study. The patients were grouped in a 1 : 1 ratio to receive compression with a novel device (the experimental group) or a conventional device without pressure control (the control group). The primary endpoint was the compression time, and the main secondary endpoints were rebleeding, upper-limb swelling, radial artery occlusion (RAO), and device-related pressure injury (DPI). Eighty-four patients were enrolled in this study. No significant differences were found in the baseline clinical characteristics between the two groups. Compared with the control group, the compression time in the experimental group was significantly reduced (207.4 ± 15.5 vs. 378.1 ± 19 min, p < 0.001). Besides, the rate of upper-limb swelling was also significantly lower in the novel device group (2.4% vs. 85.7%, p < 0.001), as well as the rate of DPI (19.05% vs. 100%, p = 0.005). Furthermore, the pain score in the experimental group was significantly lower than in the control group (0.79 ± 0.42 vs. 1.83 ± 0.58, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the rate of rebleeding (7.1% vs. 14.3, p = 0.48) between the two groups. In addition, no RAO occurred in any of the groups. The novel automatic pressure-controlled radial compression device could reduce the hemostasis time and decrease the rate of adverse complications. It might be a promising and effective compression device in TRA coronary invasive procedures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of interventional cardiology
Journal of interventional cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Interventional Cardiology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for cardiologists determined to stay current in the diagnosis, investigation, and management of patients with cardiovascular disease and its associated complications. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies focusing on new procedures and techniques in all major subject areas in the field, including: Acute coronary syndrome Coronary disease Congenital heart diseases Myocardial infarction Peripheral arterial disease Valvular heart disease Cardiac hemodynamics and physiology Haemostasis and thrombosis
期刊最新文献
Epidemiological Trends, Etiology, and Burden Study of Heart Failure in China, 1990–2019 A Comparative Analysis of Primary and Bailout ADR in CTO-PCI The Effect of Electromagnetic Interference Produced by Smartphones Using 5G Network on Patients With Permanent Pacemakers (EMS5G-PPM Study) Comparison of Sheathless and Sheathed Guiding Catheters in Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using the DynamX Sirolimus-Eluting Bioadaptor: 12-Month Clinical and Imaging Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1