几内亚比绍健康新生儿早期接种bcg -丹麦或bcg -日本与bcg -俄罗斯:一项随机对照试验

F. Schaltz-Buchholzer, M. Bjerregaard-Andersen, C. B. Øland, C. Golding, Elise Brenno Stjernholm, I. Monteiro, P. Aaby, C. Benn
{"title":"几内亚比绍健康新生儿早期接种bcg -丹麦或bcg -日本与bcg -俄罗斯:一项随机对照试验","authors":"F. Schaltz-Buchholzer, M. Bjerregaard-Andersen, C. B. Øland, C. Golding, Elise Brenno Stjernholm, I. Monteiro, P. Aaby, C. Benn","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciz1080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nBacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination remains a cornerstone against tuberculosis. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has demonstrated that BCG-Denmark lowers all-cause mortality, but a recent RCT found no effect of BCG-Russia. Observational studies indicate that the genetically divergent BCG strains have different effects.\n\n\nMETHODS\nParallel-group, open-label RCT conducted at the National Hospital in Guinea-Bissau. Healthy neonates were randomized 1:1 to BCG-Denmark (2,851 randomized, 2,840 analyzed) versus BCG-Russia (2,845 randomized, 2,837 analyzed). We hypothesized that BCG-Denmark would reduce morbidity (primary outcome) and mortality while inducing more BCG reactions and Purified Protein Derivative (PPD) responses (secondary outcomes). Halfway through the trial, production of BCG-Denmark was halted, and the trial continued comparing BCG-Japan (3,191 neonates randomized, 3,184 analyzed) with BCG-Russia (3,170 randomized, 3,160 analyzed). Mortality and morbidity data were collected by telephone, at home-visits and at the National Hospital and assessed in Cox-models providing 6-week Mortality Rate Ratios (MRRs) and hospitalization Incidence Rate Ratios (IRRs).\n\n\nRESULTS\nBy age 6 weeks, there were 140 admissions among neonates vaccinated with BCG-Denmark and 130 admissions for BCG-Russia, IRR=1.08 (95% Confidence Interval: 0.84-1.37). For BCG-Japan there were 185 admissions versus 161 admissions for BCG-Russia, IRR=1.15 (0.93-1.43). The 6-week mortality did not differ, BCG-Denmark/BCG-Russia MRR=1.15 (0.74-1.81); BCG-Japan/BCG-Russia MRR=0.71 (0.43-1.19). BCG-Denmark and BCG-Japan induced more BCG scars and PPD reactions than BCG-Russia.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nBCG strains did not affect morbidity. BCG-Denmark and BCG-Japan were more immunogenic than BCG-Russia by the measures traditionally viewed as surrogates for successful immunization. The implications of strain differences for tuberculosis protection and overall health warrant further study.","PeriodicalId":10421,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early vaccination with BCG-Denmark or BCG-Japan versus BCG-Russia to healthy newborns in Guinea-Bissau: A randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"F. Schaltz-Buchholzer, M. Bjerregaard-Andersen, C. B. Øland, C. Golding, Elise Brenno Stjernholm, I. Monteiro, P. Aaby, C. Benn\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/cid/ciz1080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nBacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination remains a cornerstone against tuberculosis. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has demonstrated that BCG-Denmark lowers all-cause mortality, but a recent RCT found no effect of BCG-Russia. Observational studies indicate that the genetically divergent BCG strains have different effects.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nParallel-group, open-label RCT conducted at the National Hospital in Guinea-Bissau. Healthy neonates were randomized 1:1 to BCG-Denmark (2,851 randomized, 2,840 analyzed) versus BCG-Russia (2,845 randomized, 2,837 analyzed). We hypothesized that BCG-Denmark would reduce morbidity (primary outcome) and mortality while inducing more BCG reactions and Purified Protein Derivative (PPD) responses (secondary outcomes). Halfway through the trial, production of BCG-Denmark was halted, and the trial continued comparing BCG-Japan (3,191 neonates randomized, 3,184 analyzed) with BCG-Russia (3,170 randomized, 3,160 analyzed). Mortality and morbidity data were collected by telephone, at home-visits and at the National Hospital and assessed in Cox-models providing 6-week Mortality Rate Ratios (MRRs) and hospitalization Incidence Rate Ratios (IRRs).\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nBy age 6 weeks, there were 140 admissions among neonates vaccinated with BCG-Denmark and 130 admissions for BCG-Russia, IRR=1.08 (95% Confidence Interval: 0.84-1.37). For BCG-Japan there were 185 admissions versus 161 admissions for BCG-Russia, IRR=1.15 (0.93-1.43). The 6-week mortality did not differ, BCG-Denmark/BCG-Russia MRR=1.15 (0.74-1.81); BCG-Japan/BCG-Russia MRR=0.71 (0.43-1.19). BCG-Denmark and BCG-Japan induced more BCG scars and PPD reactions than BCG-Russia.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nBCG strains did not affect morbidity. BCG-Denmark and BCG-Japan were more immunogenic than BCG-Russia by the measures traditionally viewed as surrogates for successful immunization. The implications of strain differences for tuberculosis protection and overall health warrant further study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciz1080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciz1080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

背景:卡介苗接种仍然是防治结核病的基石。随机对照试验(RCT)表明,丹麦的bcg降低了全因死亡率,但最近的一项RCT发现俄罗斯的bcg没有效果。观察性研究表明,遗传差异的卡介苗株具有不同的效果。方法在几内亚比绍国立医院进行平行组、开放标签随机对照试验。健康新生儿按1:1随机分为bcg -丹麦组(2851名随机,2840名分析)和bcg -俄罗斯组(2845名随机,2837名分析)。我们假设BCG- denmark会降低发病率(主要结局)和死亡率,同时诱导更多的BCG反应和纯化蛋白衍生物(PPD)反应(次要结局)。试验进行到一半,bcg -丹麦的生产停止,试验继续比较bcg -日本(随机3191例,分析3184例)和bcg -俄罗斯(随机3170例,分析3160例)。通过电话、家访和国立医院收集死亡率和发病率数据,并用cox模型进行评估,提供6周死亡率比(MRRs)和住院发病率比(IRRs)。结果6周龄时,接种bcg -丹麦的新生儿入院140例,接种bcg -俄罗斯的新生儿入院130例,IRR=1.08(95%可信区间:0.84-1.37)。bcg -日本有185人,而bcg -俄罗斯有161人,IRR=1.15(0.93-1.43)。6周死亡率无差异,丹麦/俄罗斯的MRR=1.15 (0.74-1.81);bcg -日本/ bcg -俄罗斯MRR=0.71(0.43-1.19)。BCG-丹麦和BCG-日本比BCG-俄罗斯引起更多的BCG疤痕和PPD反应。结论卡介苗株对发病率无影响。通过传统上被视为成功免疫替代指标的措施,bcg -丹麦和bcg -日本比bcg -俄罗斯更具免疫原性。菌株差异对结核病保护和整体健康的影响值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Early vaccination with BCG-Denmark or BCG-Japan versus BCG-Russia to healthy newborns in Guinea-Bissau: A randomized controlled trial.
BACKGROUND Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination remains a cornerstone against tuberculosis. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has demonstrated that BCG-Denmark lowers all-cause mortality, but a recent RCT found no effect of BCG-Russia. Observational studies indicate that the genetically divergent BCG strains have different effects. METHODS Parallel-group, open-label RCT conducted at the National Hospital in Guinea-Bissau. Healthy neonates were randomized 1:1 to BCG-Denmark (2,851 randomized, 2,840 analyzed) versus BCG-Russia (2,845 randomized, 2,837 analyzed). We hypothesized that BCG-Denmark would reduce morbidity (primary outcome) and mortality while inducing more BCG reactions and Purified Protein Derivative (PPD) responses (secondary outcomes). Halfway through the trial, production of BCG-Denmark was halted, and the trial continued comparing BCG-Japan (3,191 neonates randomized, 3,184 analyzed) with BCG-Russia (3,170 randomized, 3,160 analyzed). Mortality and morbidity data were collected by telephone, at home-visits and at the National Hospital and assessed in Cox-models providing 6-week Mortality Rate Ratios (MRRs) and hospitalization Incidence Rate Ratios (IRRs). RESULTS By age 6 weeks, there were 140 admissions among neonates vaccinated with BCG-Denmark and 130 admissions for BCG-Russia, IRR=1.08 (95% Confidence Interval: 0.84-1.37). For BCG-Japan there were 185 admissions versus 161 admissions for BCG-Russia, IRR=1.15 (0.93-1.43). The 6-week mortality did not differ, BCG-Denmark/BCG-Russia MRR=1.15 (0.74-1.81); BCG-Japan/BCG-Russia MRR=0.71 (0.43-1.19). BCG-Denmark and BCG-Japan induced more BCG scars and PPD reactions than BCG-Russia. CONCLUSION BCG strains did not affect morbidity. BCG-Denmark and BCG-Japan were more immunogenic than BCG-Russia by the measures traditionally viewed as surrogates for successful immunization. The implications of strain differences for tuberculosis protection and overall health warrant further study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mass tuberculosis screening among the elderly: A population-based study in a well-confined rural county in eastern China. High-level Colonization With Antibiotic-Resistant Enterobacterales Among Individuals in a Semi-Urban Setting in South India: An Antibiotic Resistance in Communities and Hospitals (ARCH) Study. Timing and Predictors of Loss of Infectivity among Healthcare Workers with Primary and Recurrent COVID-19: a Prospective Observational Cohort Study No immunological interference or safety concerns when adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine is coadministered with a COVID-19 mRNA-1273 booster vaccine in adults aged 50 years and older: A randomized trial Metformin Use Is Associated With Lower Mortality in Veterans With Diabetes Hospitalized With Pneumonia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1