{"title":"癌症护理中的患者赋权:范围综述》。","authors":"Soo Hyun Kim, Yu Hyeon Choe, Da Hye Kim","doi":"10.1097/NCC.0000000000001228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient empowerment is receiving increasing attention in cancer care, and its relevance has led to a growing body of literature. Empowerment-related evidence, however, has not been comprehensively reviewed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this scoping review was to summarize the available evidence on patient empowerment in cancer care. Specifically, we examined how patient empowerment has been defined and measured and what we have learned.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched 6 databases (MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO), adapting key search terms (eg, \"neoplasm,\" \"empowerment\") to each. Extracted data included author, publication year, country of data collection, main study purpose, study design, sampling method, setting, cancer trajectory, definition of empowerment and its source, measurement of empowerment, correlates, intervention (if applicable), and major results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2987 articles we initially identified, we included 64 studies (18 quantitative, 9 qualitative, 9 psychometric validation, 8 mixed methods, 6 reviews, and 14 others). Across designs, randomized controlled trials were the most frequent. A comprehensive summary by study designs was provided.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The review highlights the importance of defining the empowerment concept, which is generally vague. There is a paucity of research on examining the relationship between empowerment and its related concepts. More nonexperimental studies (eg, cross-sectional, longitudinal, case-control studies) are required.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Nurses are in an optimal position to engage in the process of empowerment, leading to its benefits. To achieve the best outcomes, nurses need to clarify the definition, select an appropriate measurement, and be trained in empowerment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50713,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"471-483"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Empowerment in Cancer Care: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Soo Hyun Kim, Yu Hyeon Choe, Da Hye Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NCC.0000000000001228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient empowerment is receiving increasing attention in cancer care, and its relevance has led to a growing body of literature. Empowerment-related evidence, however, has not been comprehensively reviewed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this scoping review was to summarize the available evidence on patient empowerment in cancer care. Specifically, we examined how patient empowerment has been defined and measured and what we have learned.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched 6 databases (MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO), adapting key search terms (eg, \\\"neoplasm,\\\" \\\"empowerment\\\") to each. Extracted data included author, publication year, country of data collection, main study purpose, study design, sampling method, setting, cancer trajectory, definition of empowerment and its source, measurement of empowerment, correlates, intervention (if applicable), and major results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2987 articles we initially identified, we included 64 studies (18 quantitative, 9 qualitative, 9 psychometric validation, 8 mixed methods, 6 reviews, and 14 others). Across designs, randomized controlled trials were the most frequent. A comprehensive summary by study designs was provided.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The review highlights the importance of defining the empowerment concept, which is generally vague. There is a paucity of research on examining the relationship between empowerment and its related concepts. More nonexperimental studies (eg, cross-sectional, longitudinal, case-control studies) are required.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Nurses are in an optimal position to engage in the process of empowerment, leading to its benefits. To achieve the best outcomes, nurses need to clarify the definition, select an appropriate measurement, and be trained in empowerment strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50713,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"471-483\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000001228\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000001228","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patient Empowerment in Cancer Care: A Scoping Review.
Background: Patient empowerment is receiving increasing attention in cancer care, and its relevance has led to a growing body of literature. Empowerment-related evidence, however, has not been comprehensively reviewed.
Objective: The purpose of this scoping review was to summarize the available evidence on patient empowerment in cancer care. Specifically, we examined how patient empowerment has been defined and measured and what we have learned.
Methods: We searched 6 databases (MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO), adapting key search terms (eg, "neoplasm," "empowerment") to each. Extracted data included author, publication year, country of data collection, main study purpose, study design, sampling method, setting, cancer trajectory, definition of empowerment and its source, measurement of empowerment, correlates, intervention (if applicable), and major results.
Results: Of the 2987 articles we initially identified, we included 64 studies (18 quantitative, 9 qualitative, 9 psychometric validation, 8 mixed methods, 6 reviews, and 14 others). Across designs, randomized controlled trials were the most frequent. A comprehensive summary by study designs was provided.
Conclusions: The review highlights the importance of defining the empowerment concept, which is generally vague. There is a paucity of research on examining the relationship between empowerment and its related concepts. More nonexperimental studies (eg, cross-sectional, longitudinal, case-control studies) are required.
Implications for practice: Nurses are in an optimal position to engage in the process of empowerment, leading to its benefits. To achieve the best outcomes, nurses need to clarify the definition, select an appropriate measurement, and be trained in empowerment strategies.
期刊介绍:
Each bimonthly issue of Cancer Nursing™ addresses the whole spectrum of problems arising in the care and support of cancer patients--prevention and early detection, geriatric and pediatric cancer nursing, medical and surgical oncology, ambulatory care, nutritional support, psychosocial aspects of cancer, patient responses to all treatment modalities, and specific nursing interventions. The journal offers unparalleled coverage of cancer care delivery practices worldwide, as well as groundbreaking research findings and their practical applications.