对“输尿管软镜与微型经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石的效果比较:配对分析”的评论。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1806-9282.20221429
André Pontes-Silva
{"title":"对“输尿管软镜与微型经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石的效果比较:配对分析”的评论。","authors":"André Pontes-Silva","doi":"10.1590/1806-9282.20221429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the article entitled “Comparison of the outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of kidney stones: a matched-pair analysis,” Rodrigues et al. 1 compared the outcomes of initial mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy. This study has scientific relevance; however, it did not answer an important question: does statistical significance (p<0.05) have clinical importance? A comparison of outcomes must consider the clinical relevance of the differences because the","PeriodicalId":21234,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira","volume":"69 2","pages":"215"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d1/9f/1806-9282-ramb-69-02-0215.PMC9983478.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comments on \\\"Comparison of the outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of kidney stones: a matched-pair analysis\\\".\",\"authors\":\"André Pontes-Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1806-9282.20221429\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the article entitled “Comparison of the outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of kidney stones: a matched-pair analysis,” Rodrigues et al. 1 compared the outcomes of initial mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy. This study has scientific relevance; however, it did not answer an important question: does statistical significance (p<0.05) have clinical importance? A comparison of outcomes must consider the clinical relevance of the differences because the\",\"PeriodicalId\":21234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira\",\"volume\":\"69 2\",\"pages\":\"215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d1/9f/1806-9282-ramb-69-02-0215.PMC9983478.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20221429\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20221429","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comments on "Comparison of the outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of kidney stones: a matched-pair analysis".
In the article entitled “Comparison of the outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of kidney stones: a matched-pair analysis,” Rodrigues et al. 1 compared the outcomes of initial mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy. This study has scientific relevance; however, it did not answer an important question: does statistical significance (p<0.05) have clinical importance? A comparison of outcomes must consider the clinical relevance of the differences because the
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
276
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: A Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (RAMB), editada pela Associação Médica Brasileira, desde 1954, tem por objetivo publicar artigos que contribuam para o conhecimento médico.
期刊最新文献
Anatomical features of sella turcica with comprehensive literature review. ERRATUM. A needful, unique, and in-place evaluation of the injuries in earthquake victims with computed tomography, in catastrophic disasters! The 2023 Turkey-Syria earthquakes: part II. The challenge of tobacco and nicotine use among women. 18F-fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1