联合使用多种量表衡量老年人跌倒风险的有效性

Javier Aceituno Gómez
{"title":"联合使用多种量表衡量老年人跌倒风险的有效性","authors":"Javier Aceituno Gómez","doi":"10.1016/S1138-6045(08)76324-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To attempt to establish a relationship among combined actions of several assessment scales of risk of falls related to previous reports of involuntary falls by elderly institutionalized subjects in a day care service during the last year.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>Evaluations of day care center users were carried out with the Tinetti test, Timed up and Go, Functional Reach test and JH Dowton fall risk scale. In addition to age, the Barthel index of functional capacity and existence or not of falls during the last year was recorded.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>38 people (25 women and 13 men) were studied. Mean age was 81.5 (SD: 5.4) and the Barthel index 84.1(17.2). Individual tests showed a similar proportion of falls among users at risk (approx. 55 %) and a greater difference among users without risks. In an isolated way, the greatest predictive effectiveness on falls followed the next sequence: Tinetti, JH Dowton, Timed Up and Go and Functional Reach. Nevertheless, when the four trials are combined, it can be observed that 63.6% of the elderly have had 3 or 4 positive trials have suffered at least one fall during the last year, while this percentage is reduced to 25 % among those with 2 or less positives on the risk assessment scales.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The combined use of the four assessment scales used in this study shows better sensitivity to the risk of fall than evaluation with individual use of the above-mentioned tests.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101113,"journal":{"name":"Revista Iberoamericana de Fisioterapia y Kinesiología","volume":"11 2","pages":"Pages 60-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1138-6045(08)76324-X","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efectividad del uso combinado de varias escalas para medir el riesgo de caídas en ancianos\",\"authors\":\"Javier Aceituno Gómez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1138-6045(08)76324-X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To attempt to establish a relationship among combined actions of several assessment scales of risk of falls related to previous reports of involuntary falls by elderly institutionalized subjects in a day care service during the last year.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>Evaluations of day care center users were carried out with the Tinetti test, Timed up and Go, Functional Reach test and JH Dowton fall risk scale. In addition to age, the Barthel index of functional capacity and existence or not of falls during the last year was recorded.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>38 people (25 women and 13 men) were studied. Mean age was 81.5 (SD: 5.4) and the Barthel index 84.1(17.2). Individual tests showed a similar proportion of falls among users at risk (approx. 55 %) and a greater difference among users without risks. In an isolated way, the greatest predictive effectiveness on falls followed the next sequence: Tinetti, JH Dowton, Timed Up and Go and Functional Reach. Nevertheless, when the four trials are combined, it can be observed that 63.6% of the elderly have had 3 or 4 positive trials have suffered at least one fall during the last year, while this percentage is reduced to 25 % among those with 2 or less positives on the risk assessment scales.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The combined use of the four assessment scales used in this study shows better sensitivity to the risk of fall than evaluation with individual use of the above-mentioned tests.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Iberoamericana de Fisioterapia y Kinesiología\",\"volume\":\"11 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 60-67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1138-6045(08)76324-X\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Iberoamericana de Fisioterapia y Kinesiología\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S113860450876324X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Iberoamericana de Fisioterapia y Kinesiología","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S113860450876324X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的探讨近一年来住院老人非自愿跌倒相关的跌倒风险评估量表组合行为之间的关系。采用Tinetti测试、Timed up and Go测试、Functional Reach测试和JH Dowton跌倒风险量表对日托中心使用者进行评估。除年龄外,还记录了过去一年中功能能力和有无跌倒的Barthel指数。结果共对38人(女性25人,男性13人)进行了研究。平均年龄81.5岁(SD: 5.4), Barthel指数84.1(17.2)。个人测试显示,在有风险的用户中,跌倒的比例相似(约为10%)。55%),而在没有风险的用户中差异更大。从孤立的角度来看,对跌倒的预测效果最好的顺序是:蒂内蒂、JH道顿、Timed Up and Go和功能性到达。然而,当四项试验结合起来时,可以观察到63.6%的老年人在过去一年中进行了3或4次阳性试验,至少有一次跌倒,而在风险评估量表上阳性2次或更少的老年人中,这一比例降至25%。结论综合使用四种评估量表对跌倒风险的敏感性优于单独使用上述四种评估量表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efectividad del uso combinado de varias escalas para medir el riesgo de caídas en ancianos

Objective

To attempt to establish a relationship among combined actions of several assessment scales of risk of falls related to previous reports of involuntary falls by elderly institutionalized subjects in a day care service during the last year.

Patients and methods

Evaluations of day care center users were carried out with the Tinetti test, Timed up and Go, Functional Reach test and JH Dowton fall risk scale. In addition to age, the Barthel index of functional capacity and existence or not of falls during the last year was recorded.

Results

38 people (25 women and 13 men) were studied. Mean age was 81.5 (SD: 5.4) and the Barthel index 84.1(17.2). Individual tests showed a similar proportion of falls among users at risk (approx. 55 %) and a greater difference among users without risks. In an isolated way, the greatest predictive effectiveness on falls followed the next sequence: Tinetti, JH Dowton, Timed Up and Go and Functional Reach. Nevertheless, when the four trials are combined, it can be observed that 63.6% of the elderly have had 3 or 4 positive trials have suffered at least one fall during the last year, while this percentage is reduced to 25 % among those with 2 or less positives on the risk assessment scales.

Conclusions

The combined use of the four assessment scales used in this study shows better sensitivity to the risk of fall than evaluation with individual use of the above-mentioned tests.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Disminución del dolor en cervicalgias mediante la aplicación de microcorrientes Arquitectura muscular y momento de fuerza: relación en el erector espinal durante extensión isométrica máxima Efectos de la técnica de Mulligan en un paciente quemado. A propósito de un caso Procedimiento fisioterapéutico en esclerosis múltiple en fase aguda. A propósito de 2 casos Calidad de la información sobre ejercicios en las páginas de Internet dirigida a sobrevivientes de cáncer de seno
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1