女权主义与环境伦理

IF 0.5 0 PHILOSOPHY Ethics and the Environment Pub Date : 2000-03-01 DOI:10.1016/S1085-6633(99)00026-1
Mary Mellor
{"title":"女权主义与环境伦理","authors":"Mary Mellor","doi":"10.1016/S1085-6633(99)00026-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is a long-standing claim within feminist literature that women speak with a ‘different voice’ <span>(Gilligan 1982)</span>, that it is both possible and desirable to have an ethics from the standpoint of women <span>(Noddings 1990)</span>, that the standpoint of women is a better starting point for adequate knowledge of the world <span>(Harding 1993)</span>. This claim is central to ecofeminist politics, that women have a particular perspective on the relationship between humanity and nature and have a moral/political calling to reweave the world <span>(Diamond and Orenstein 1990)</span> or heal the wounds of an ecologically destructive social order <span>(Plant 1989)</span>. In this essay I will not be making the claim that women per se have a superior vision or a higher moral authority, but that an ethics that does not take account of the gendered nature of society is doomed to failure as it will confront neither the material structure of human society or the way in which that structure impacts on the materiality of the relationship between humanity and nature.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54127,"journal":{"name":"Ethics and the Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2000-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1085-6633(99)00026-1","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feminism and Environmental Ethics\",\"authors\":\"Mary Mellor\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1085-6633(99)00026-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>There is a long-standing claim within feminist literature that women speak with a ‘different voice’ <span>(Gilligan 1982)</span>, that it is both possible and desirable to have an ethics from the standpoint of women <span>(Noddings 1990)</span>, that the standpoint of women is a better starting point for adequate knowledge of the world <span>(Harding 1993)</span>. This claim is central to ecofeminist politics, that women have a particular perspective on the relationship between humanity and nature and have a moral/political calling to reweave the world <span>(Diamond and Orenstein 1990)</span> or heal the wounds of an ecologically destructive social order <span>(Plant 1989)</span>. In this essay I will not be making the claim that women per se have a superior vision or a higher moral authority, but that an ethics that does not take account of the gendered nature of society is doomed to failure as it will confront neither the material structure of human society or the way in which that structure impacts on the materiality of the relationship between humanity and nature.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethics and the Environment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1085-6633(99)00026-1\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethics and the Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1085663399000261\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1085663399000261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

在女权主义文学中有一个长期存在的主张,即女性用“不同的声音”说话(Gilligan 1982),从女性的角度来看待道德是可能的,也是可取的(Noddings 1990),女性的立场是充分认识世界的更好起点(Harding 1993)。这一主张是生态女性主义政治的核心,即女性对人类与自然之间的关系有特殊的看法,并有道德/政治召唤来重新编织世界(Diamond and Orenstein 1990)或治愈生态破坏性社会秩序的创伤(Plant 1989)。在这篇文章中,我不会声称女性本身具有优越的视野或更高的道德权威,但不考虑社会性别本质的伦理是注定要失败的,因为它既不会面对人类社会的物质结构,也不会面对这种结构对人类与自然之间关系的物质性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Feminism and Environmental Ethics

There is a long-standing claim within feminist literature that women speak with a ‘different voice’ (Gilligan 1982), that it is both possible and desirable to have an ethics from the standpoint of women (Noddings 1990), that the standpoint of women is a better starting point for adequate knowledge of the world (Harding 1993). This claim is central to ecofeminist politics, that women have a particular perspective on the relationship between humanity and nature and have a moral/political calling to reweave the world (Diamond and Orenstein 1990) or heal the wounds of an ecologically destructive social order (Plant 1989). In this essay I will not be making the claim that women per se have a superior vision or a higher moral authority, but that an ethics that does not take account of the gendered nature of society is doomed to failure as it will confront neither the material structure of human society or the way in which that structure impacts on the materiality of the relationship between humanity and nature.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mapping Gendered Ecologies: Engaging with and Beyond Ecowomanism and Ecofeminism by K. Melchor Quick Hall and Gwyn Kirk (review) Missing Voices of Ecofeminism in Environmental Governance: Consequences and Future Directions Ecofeminist Ontology in Karen Warren's Ethic 'I am cringe, but I am free': A Reparative Reading of Assuming the Ecosexual Position Karen J. Warren: Her Work in The Making of Ecofeminism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1