腹部子宫肌瘤切除术的发病率:打破神话

Dattakumar Kunde , Yakoub Khalaf
{"title":"腹部子宫肌瘤切除术的发病率:打破神话","authors":"Dattakumar Kunde ,&nbsp;Yakoub Khalaf","doi":"10.1016/j.rigp.2005.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Abdominal myomectomy is the commonest conservative surgical procedure offered to patients with symptomatic fibroids and as a fertility enhancing procedure to some women with large intramural fibroids when no other cause for subfertility is evident. Historically myomectomy has been considered to be a complex procedure with high risk of complications. However, there is no evidence to support this assumption and recent studies have shown that the morbidity of myomectomy and hysterectomy is comparable. In recent times, new treatment strategies with a minimally invasive approach have evolved but are available only in selected centres and their efficacy has not been evaluated in the light of well-designed research trials. Therefore, myomectomy remains the mainstay of surgical treatment in women who wish to retain their uterus. This review aims to dispel the misconceptions about morbidity of myomectomy and provides an evidence-based account of the measures that can be taken to minimise it.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101089,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Gynaecological Practice","volume":"5 2","pages":"Pages 82-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rigp.2005.04.003","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Morbidity of abdominal myomectomy: Dispelling the myth\",\"authors\":\"Dattakumar Kunde ,&nbsp;Yakoub Khalaf\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rigp.2005.04.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Abdominal myomectomy is the commonest conservative surgical procedure offered to patients with symptomatic fibroids and as a fertility enhancing procedure to some women with large intramural fibroids when no other cause for subfertility is evident. Historically myomectomy has been considered to be a complex procedure with high risk of complications. However, there is no evidence to support this assumption and recent studies have shown that the morbidity of myomectomy and hysterectomy is comparable. In recent times, new treatment strategies with a minimally invasive approach have evolved but are available only in selected centres and their efficacy has not been evaluated in the light of well-designed research trials. Therefore, myomectomy remains the mainstay of surgical treatment in women who wish to retain their uterus. This review aims to dispel the misconceptions about morbidity of myomectomy and provides an evidence-based account of the measures that can be taken to minimise it.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in Gynaecological Practice\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 82-88\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rigp.2005.04.003\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in Gynaecological Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471769705000250\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Gynaecological Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471769705000250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

对于有症状的肌瘤患者,腹肌瘤切除术是最常见的保守手术,当没有其他原因导致生育能力低下时,腹肌瘤切除术也可作为一种增强生育能力的手术。子宫肌瘤切除术历来被认为是一项复杂的手术,并发症风险高。然而,没有证据支持这一假设,最近的研究表明子宫肌瘤切除术和子宫切除术的发病率是相当的。近年来,采用微创方法的新治疗策略不断发展,但仅在选定的中心可用,其疗效尚未根据精心设计的研究试验进行评估。因此,子宫肌瘤切除术仍然是希望保留子宫的妇女的主要手术治疗方法。这篇综述旨在消除对子宫肌瘤切除术发病率的误解,并提供了一个基于证据的措施,可以采取尽量减少它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Morbidity of abdominal myomectomy: Dispelling the myth

Abdominal myomectomy is the commonest conservative surgical procedure offered to patients with symptomatic fibroids and as a fertility enhancing procedure to some women with large intramural fibroids when no other cause for subfertility is evident. Historically myomectomy has been considered to be a complex procedure with high risk of complications. However, there is no evidence to support this assumption and recent studies have shown that the morbidity of myomectomy and hysterectomy is comparable. In recent times, new treatment strategies with a minimally invasive approach have evolved but are available only in selected centres and their efficacy has not been evaluated in the light of well-designed research trials. Therefore, myomectomy remains the mainstay of surgical treatment in women who wish to retain their uterus. This review aims to dispel the misconceptions about morbidity of myomectomy and provides an evidence-based account of the measures that can be taken to minimise it.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contents Non-surgical management of urinary stress incontinence Common congenital anomalies of the female genital tract Investigations for chronic pelvic pain How to manage locally advanced primary and recurrent cancer of the uterine cervix: The surgeon's view
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1